<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">scidial</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Научный диалог</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Nauchnyi dialog</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2225-756X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2227-1295</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Limited Liability Company "Center for Scientific and Educational Projects" (CSEP)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-2-63-76</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">scidial-3667</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЯЗЫКОЗНАНИЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>LINGUISTICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Эпистемическая каузальность в художественном дискурсе М. Эмиса</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Epistemic Causality in Literary Discourse of M. Amis</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8684-0382</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Петренко</surname><given-names>С. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Petrenko</surname><given-names>S. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Петренко Светлана Анатольевна - кандидат филологических наук, доцент, кафедра экспериментальной лингвистики и межкультурной компетенции.</p><p>Пятигорск.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Svetlana A. Petrenko - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Experimental Linguistics and Intercultural Competence.</p><p>Pyatigorsk.</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">speterson@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9004-9198</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Петренко</surname><given-names>А. Ф.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Petrenko</surname><given-names>A. Ph.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Петренко Александр Филиппович - кандидат филологических наук, профессор, кафедра словесности и педагогических технологий филологического образования.</p><p>Пятигорск.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Alexander Ph. Petrenko - PhD in Philology, Professor, Department of Literature and Pedagogical Technologies of Philological Education.</p><p>Pyatigorsk.</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">petrenko@pgu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Пятигорский государственный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Pyatigorsk State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>03</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>63</fpage><lpage>76</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Петренко С.А., Петренко А.Ф., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Петренко С.А., Петренко А.Ф.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Petrenko S.A., Petrenko A.P.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3667">https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/3667</self-uri><abstract><p>Изучаются эпистемические каузальные отношения в дискурсе Мартина Эмиса на примере сложных высказываний с коннектором because, эксплицирующим несобственно-причинную связь между пропозициями. Актуальность исследования обусловлена важностью изучения логико-семантической сущности причинности как базовой категории человеческого мышления. Механизм каузальной аргументации рассматривается с точки зрения когнитивного взаимодействия причинно-следственных элементов дискурса. Уделяется внимание эпистемическим аргументативным отношениям, представляющим собой последовательное разворачивание мыслительного процесса с обратной / регрессивной обусловленностью событий, где за мнением-выводом следует аргумент, из которого данный вывод был сформулирован. Описывается широкий диапазон функционально-семантических ролей причинного коннектора в качестве экспликатора эпистемической каузальности. Посредством контекстуального анализа микроситуаций с коннектором because выявляется многообразие логических связей между находящимися в обратной зависимости пропозициями, а также в конструкциях, близких к паратактическим. Описывается специфика функциональных возможностей изучаемого союза, что приводит авторов к созданию классификации эпистемических каузальных отношений с причинным союзом because в английском языке. Выявляются четыре эпистемические функции коннектора because: дискурсивно-рефлексивная, экспрессивно-эпистемическая, имплицитно-эпистемическая и логико-дискурсивная.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Epistemic causal relations in the discourse of Martin Amis are studied on the example of complex statements with the connector because, which expresses the non-self-causal relationship between propositions. The relevance of the study is due to the importance of studying the logical and semantic essence of causality as a basic category of human thinking. The mechanism of causal argumentation is considered from the point of view of the cognitive interaction of cause-and-effect elements of discourse.  Attention is paid to epistemic argumentative relations, which are a sequential unfolding of the thought process with the reverse / regressive conditionality of events, where the opinion-conclusion is followed by the argument from which this conclusion was formulated. A wide range of functional and semantic roles of the causal connector as an explicator of epistemic causality is described. The contextual analysis of microsituations with the connector because reveals a variety of logical connections between inversely related propositions, as well as in constructions close to paratactic ones. The specificity of the functional capabilities of the conjunction under study is described, which leads the authors to create a classification of epistemic causal relations with the causal conjunction because in English is described. Four epistemic functions of the connector because are identified: discursive-reflexive, expressive-epistemic, implicit-epistemic, and logical-discursive.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>эпистемическая модальность</kwd><kwd>каузальные отношения</kwd><kwd>причинный союз</kwd><kwd>художественный дискурс</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>epistemic modality</kwd><kwd>causal relationships</kwd><kwd>causal union</kwd><kwd>artistic discourse</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">ALF — Amis M. London Fields / M. Amis. — London : Vintage, 1991. — 470 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Amis, M. (1991). London Fields. London: Vintage. 470 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">AOP — Amis M. Other People / M. Amis. — London : Vintage, 1994. — 224 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Amis, M. (1991). Success. London: Vintage. 224 p. ISBN 0099461854.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">ARP — Amis M. The Rachel Papers / M. Amis. — London : Vintage, 2003. — 224 p. — ISBN 0099466694.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Amis, M. (1994). Other People. London: Vintage. 224 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">AS — Amis M. Success / M. Amis. — London : Vintage, 1991. — 224 p. — ISBN 0099461854.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Amis, M. (2003). The Rachel Papers. London: Vintage. 224 p. ISBN 0099466694.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аганесов В. С. Каузальные союзы английского языка как объект исследования / В. С. Аганесов // Вопросы романо-германской и русской филологии. — 2009. — Т. 1. — С. 5—19.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aganesov, V. S. (2009). Causal conjunctions of the English language as an object of research. Questions of Romano-Germanic and Russian philology, 1: 5—19. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аганесов В. С. Структурно и семантически несамодостаточные главные предложения с постпозитивным придаточным предложением с союзом because / В. С. Аганесов // Университетские чтения –– 2019. Материалы научно-методических чтений ПГУ. — 2019. — С. 115—119.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aganesov, V. S. (2019). Structurally and semantically non-self-sufficient main sentences with a postpositive subordinate clause with the conjunctions because. In: University readings — 2019. Materials of scientific and methodological readings of PSU. 115—119. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Безрукова О. Г. Средства выражения причинно-следственных и формально-логических отношений в английском и русском языках / О. Г. Безрукова, Н. Ю. Микитенко // Вестник Калмыцкого университета. — 2012. — № 2 (14). — С. 88—92.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Altenberg, B. (1987). Causal ordering strategies in English conversation. In: Grammar in the construction of texts. London: Cambridge University Press. 50—64.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Всеволодова М. В. Причинно-следственные отношения в современном русском языке / М. В. Всеволодова, Т. А. Ященко. — Изд. 2-е. — Москва : URSS : Изд-во ЛКИ, 2008. — 207 с. — ISBN 978-5-382-00612-3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bezrukova, O. G., Mikitenko, N. Y. (2012). Means of expressing causal and formal-logical relations in English and Russian. Bulletin of the Kalmyk University, 2 (14): 88—92. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дальбергенова Л. Е. Исследования каузальных отношений в современной лингвистике [Электронный ресурс] / Л. Е. Дальбергенова, Ш. К. Жаркынбекова // Современные проблемы науки и образования. — 2013. — № 6. — Режим доступа : https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=10878 (дата обращения 21.08.2021).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dalbergenova, L. E., Zharkynbekova, Sh. K. (2013). Studies of causal relations in modern linguistics. Modern problems of science and education, 6: Available at: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=10878 (accessed 21.08.2021). (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Камынина Л. И. Функционально-семантическое поле каузальности в современном английском языке : автореферат диссертации … кандидата филологических наук : 10.02.04 / Л. И. Камынина. — Москва, 1992. — 16 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Edeleva, I. V., Mustafina, A. R. (2019). Semantic analysis of cause-effect relationship in linguistics through the prism of philosophical scientific thought. Teacher of the XXI century, 2—2: 325—334. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кузьмин Ю. А. К вопросу о сущности причины и следствия / Ю. А. Кузьмин // Теология. Философия. Право. — 2020. — № 1 (13). — С. 34—43.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold. 384 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Куликова О. В. Каузальность как основа репрезентации событийной цепочки в аргументативном дискурсе / О. В. Куликова // Вестник Московского государственного лингвистического университета. Гуманитарные науки. — 2016. — № 7 (746). — С. 134—140.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Helbig, G. (1979). Rezension: W. Koch. Kasus-Kognition-Kausalitat. Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 6: 370—375. (In Germ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лопухина Р. В. Логико-семантическая сущность категории причинности / Р. В. Лопухина // Гуманитарные ведомости ТГПУ им. Л. Н. Толстого. — 2015. — № 4 (16). — С. 67—74.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kamynina, L. I. (1992). The functional and semantic field of causality in modern English. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Moscow. 16 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Петренко С. А. Позиционно-семантические характеристики союза because и особенности перевода высказываний с ним на русский язык / С. А. Петренко // Вестник Пятигорского государственного лингвистического университета. — 2002. — № 4. — С. 42—46.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kroll, B. (1977). Combining ideas in Written and Spoken English: A look at subordination and coordination. In: Discourse across time and space. Los Angeles. 69—108.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Петренко С. А. Сопоставительное описание каузальных союзов английского и русского языков : диссертация … кандидата филологических наук : 10.02.20 / С. А. Петренко. — Пятигорск, 2000. — 195 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kulikova, O. V. (2016). Causality as the basis of the representation of the event chain in argumentative discourse. Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 7 (746): 134—140. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Теремова Р. М. Собственно причинные СПП в аспекте их функционирования в тексте / Р. М. Теремова // Сложное предложение в системе других синтаксических категорий. — Ленинград : Ленинградский педагогический институт [ЛГПИ] им. А. И. Герцена, 1984. — С. 99—109.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kuzmin, Yu. A. (2020). To the question of the essence of cause and effect. Theology. Philosophy. Right, 1 (13): 34—43. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Теремова Р. М. Функции каузальных конструкций в современном русском языке / М. Теремова // Филологические науки. — 1989. — № 3. — С. 82––86.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">König, E., Siemund, P. (2000). Causal and concessive clauses: Formal and semantic relations. In: Cause — Condition — Concession — Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 341—360. DOI: 10.1515/9783110219043.4.341.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Эделева И. В. Семантический анализ причинно-следственной связи в лингвистике сквозь призму философской научной мысли / И. В. Эделева, А. Р. Мустафина // Преподаватель ХХI век. — 2019. — № 2—2. — С. 325—334.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 256 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Altenberg B. Causal ordering strategies in English conversation / B. Altenberg // Grammar in the construction of texts. — London : Cambridge University Press, 1987. — Pp. 50—64.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lehmann, Ch., Haiman, J., Thompson, S. (1988). Towards a typology of clause linkage. In: Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. 181—226. DOI: 10.1075/tsl.18.09leh.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Halliday M. A. K. An introduction to functional grammar / M. Halliday. — London : Edward Arnold, 1985. — 384 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Litkowski, K. C. (1998). Analysis of subordinating conjunctions. CL Research. Gaithersburg: MD. 21 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Helbig G. Rezension : W. Koch. Kasus-Kognition-Kausalitat / G. Helbig // Deutsch als Fremdsprache. — 1979. — Heft 6. — Pp. 370—375.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lopukhina, R. V. (2015). The logical and semantic essence of the category of causality. Humanities Bulletin of the Tolstoy State Pedagogical University, 4 (16): 67—74. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">König E. Causal and concessive clauses : Formal and semantic relations / E. König, P. Siemund // Cause — Condition — Concession — Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives (ed. by E. Couper-Kuhlen and B. Kortmann). — Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter, 2000. — Pp. 341—360. — DOI: 10.1515/9783110219043.4.341.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lowe, I. (1987). Two ways of looking at causes and reasons. In: Grammar in the construction of texts. London: [b. i.]. 37—49.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kroll B. Combining ideas in Written and Spoken English : A look at subordination and coordination / B. Kroll // Discourse across time and space. Los Angeles. — 1977. — Pp. 69—108.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mercier, H. (2012). The power of well-connected arguments: Early sensitivity to the connective because. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/17023435/The_power_of_well_connected_arguments_Early_sensitivity_to_the_connective_because (accessed 21.09.2021).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lakoff G. Metaphors we live by / G. Lakoff, M. Johnson. — Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1980. — 256 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Oversteegen, L. (2005). Causality and Tense — Two Temporal Structure Builders. Journal of Semantics, 22 (3): 307—337.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lehmann Ch. Towards a typology of clause linkage / Ch. Lehmann, J. Haiman, S. Thompson // Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. — Amsterdam/Philadelphia. — 1988. — Pp. 181—226. — DOI: 10.1075/tsl.18.09leh.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Petrenko, S. A. (2000). Comparative description of causal conjunctions of English and Russian languages. PhD Diss. Pyatigorsk. 195 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Litkowski K. C. Analysis of subordinating conjunctions. CL Research / K. C. Litkowski. — Gaithersburg : MD, 1998. — 21 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Petrenko, S. A. (2002). Positional and semantic characteristics of the conjunctions because and the features of translating statements with it into Russian. Bulletin of Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University, 4: 42—46. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lowe I. Two ways of looking at causes and reasons / I. Lowe // Grammar in the construction of texts. — London : [b. i.], 1987. — Pp. 37—49.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3—27.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mercier H. The power of well-connected arguments : Early sensitivity to the connective because [Electronic resource] / H. Mercier. — 2012. — Access mode : https://www.academia.edu/17023435/The_power_of_well_connected_arguments_Early_sensitivity_to_the_connective_because (accessed 21.09.2021).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schleppegrell, M. J. (1991). Paratactic because. Journal of Pragmatics. Amsterdam, 16 (4): 323—337.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Oversteegen L. Causality and Tense — Two Temporal Structure Builders / L. Oversteegen // Journal of Semantics. — 2005. — № 22 (3). — Pp. 307—337.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Steward, H. (2006). Understanding because. ProtoSociology, 23: 67—92. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/17048414/Understanding_Because (accessed 15.08.2021).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schiffrin D. Discourse markers / D. Shiffrin. — Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1987. — Pp. 3—27.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sweetser, E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 174 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schleppegrell M. J. Paratactic because / M. Schleppegrell // Journal of Pragmatics. — Amsterdam. — 1991. — Vol. 16. — № 4. — Pp. 323—337.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Teremova, R. M. (1984). Proper causal CS in the aspect of their functioning in the text. In: Complex sentence in the system of other syntactic categories. Leningrad: Leningrad Pedagogical Institute [LGPI] named after A. I. Herzen. 99—109. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Steward H. Understanding because [Electronic resource] / H. Steward // ProtoSociology. — 2006. — Vol. 23. — Pp. 67—92. — Access mode : https://www.academia.edu/17048414/Understanding_Because (accessed 15.08.2021).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Teremova, R. M. (1989). Functions of causal constructions in the modern Russian language. Philological sciences, 3: 82—86. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sweetser E. From Etymology to Pragmatics / E. Sweetser. — Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1990. — 174 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thorne, J. P. (1986). “Because”. Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries, 2: 1063—1066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110856132.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thorne J. P. “Because” / J. P. Thorne // Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries. — 1986. — Vol. 2. — Pp. 1063—1066. — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110856132.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Traugott, E. (1988). Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society. 406—416.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Traugott E. Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization / E. Traugott // Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society. — 1988. — Рp. 406—416.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vandepitte, S. (1988). Metapragmatic terms of the expression of propositional attitude: the case of the causal conjunctions. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 38 (1—4): 201—210.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vandepitte S. Metapragmatic terms of the expression of propositional attitude : the case of the causal conjunctions / S. Vandepitte // Acta Linguistica Hungarica. — 1988. — Vol. 38 (1—4). — Рp. 201—210.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vsevolodova, M. V., Yashchenko, T. A. (2008). Causal relations in the modern Russian language. Moscow: URSS: LKI Publishing House. 207 p. ISBN 978-5-382-00612-3. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
