<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">scidial</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Научный диалог</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Nauchnyi dialog</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2225-756X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2227-1295</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Limited Liability Company "Center for Scientific and Educational Projects" (CSEP)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-6-365-387</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">scidial-5583</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИСТОРИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>HISTORY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Выход Евросоюза из Договора к Энергетической хартии: результат климатической политики?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>European Union’s  Withdrawal from Energy Charter Treaty: A Result of Climate Policy?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6574-6258</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Зимаков</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zimakov</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Зимаков Андрей Владимирович -  кандидат экономических наук, научный сотрудник Центра европейских исследований </p><p>WoS ResearcherID: F-7869-2017</p><p>Scopus Author ID: 57194103489</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Andrey V. Zimakov - PhD in Economics, research scientist, Centre for European Studies</p><p>Moscow</p><p>WoS ResearcherID: F-7869-2017</p><p>Scopus Author ID: 57194103489</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">zimakov@newmail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Национальный исследовательский институт мировой экономики&#13;
и международных отношений имени Е. М. Примакова Российской академии наук</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and&#13;
International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>08</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>365</fpage><lpage>387</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Зимаков А.В., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Зимаков А.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Zimakov A.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/5583">https://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/5583</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья посвящена анализу политических и экономических причин решения о скоординированном выходе Евросоюза и его членов из Договора к Энергетической хартии (ДЭХ) в марте 2024 года. Особое внимание уделяется вопросу о роли в этом процессе климатической политики Евросоюза. Представлен обзор тридцати лет с момента основания договора с целью выявления влияния на внутриполитические процессы стран ЕС. На основе анализа практики инвестиционных арбитражных разбирательств, а также официальных документов ЕС делается вывод, что, несмотря на декларативные заявления, климатическая повестка была лишь внешним и второстепенным фактором, в то время как основной причиной явились изменения в инвестиционной политике ЕС. Показано, что договор не являлся препятствием для реализации климатических целей Евросоюза, однако механизм защиты инвестиций в международном арбитраже оказался несовместимым с продвигаемыми принципами автономности и приоритета права ЕС. Вместе с тем договор действительно давал инвесторам возможность требовать от правительств стран ЕС компенсаций за активы, «блокированные» в результате климатической политики. Отказ от проверенного инструмента защиты международных инвестиций может негативно повлиять на инвестиционную привлекательность «зеленой» энергетики Евросоюза.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article analyzes the political and economic motivations behind the coordinated decision of the European Union and its member states to withdraw from the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) in March 2024. Special emphasis is placed on the role of the EU’s climate policy in this process. A comprehensive review of the thirty years since the treaty’s inception is presented, aiming to uncover its influence on the domestic political dynamics within EU member states. Through an examination of investment arbitration practices and official EU documents, it is concluded that, despite declarative statements, the climate agenda was merely an external and secondary factor, while the primary driver was a shift in the EU’s investment policy. The article illustrates that the treaty did not obstruct the achievement of the EU’s climate objectives; however, the investment protection mechanism in international arbitration proved incompatible with the principles of autonomy and primacy of EU law. Furthermore, the treaty indeed provided investors with avenues to seek compensation from EU member state governments for assets “blocked” as a result of climate policies. The abandonment of a proven international investments protection tool may negatively impact the foreign investment attractiveness of the EU’s green energy sector.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>ЕС</kwd><kwd>Договор к Энергетической хартии</kwd><kwd>климатическая политика ЕС</kwd><kwd>инвестиционный арбитраж</kwd><kwd>инвестиционная политика ЕС</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>EU</kwd><kwd>Energy Charter Treaty</kwd><kwd>EU climate policy</kwd><kwd>investment arbitration</kwd><kwd>EU investment policy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гудков И. В. «Экологизация» экономических отношений в праве (на примере энергетической отрасли) / И. В. Гудков // Журнал зарубежного законодательства и сравнительного правоведения. — 2020. — № 5. — С. 124—141. — DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2020.046.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Belyi, A. (2021). The Energy Charter process in the face of uncertainties. The Journal of World Energy Law &amp; Business, 14 (5): 363—375. DOI: 10.1093/jwelb/jwab032.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гурова И. П. Противоречия реформы инвестиционных соглашений в Евросоюзе / И. П. Гурова // Экономика, предпринимательство и право. — 2016. — № 3 (32). — С. 303—314. — DOI: 10.18334/epp.6.3.36154.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bonnitcha, J., Langford, M., Alvarez-Zarate, J., Behn, D. (2023). Damages and ISDS Reform: Between Procedure and Substance. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 14 (2): 213—241. DOI: 10.1093/jnlids/idab034.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ермакова Е. П. «Солнечные» споры : может ли выход Италии из Договора к Энергетической хартии привести к его краху? / Е. П. Ермакова // Государство и право. — 2022. — № 3. — C. 150—163. — DOI: 10.31857/S102694520019171-9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Braoudakis, N., Craveia, R., Baldon, C. (2024). Neutralising the ECT Sunset Clause Inter Se. ICSID Review — Foreign Investment Law Journal, 39 (1): 7—8. DOI: 10.1093/ icsidreview/siae011.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зимаков А. В. Есть ли будущее для угольных ТЭС в Европе? / А. В. Зимаков // Вестник МГИМО Университета. — 2017. — № 5 (56). — С. 130—150. — DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2017-5-56-130-150.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ermakova, E. P. (2022). “Solar” disputes: can Italy’s withdrawal from the Energy Charter Treaty lead to its collapse? State and law, 3: 150—163. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520019171-9. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зимаков А. В. Политика отказа Германии от атомной энергетики : от конфликта к компромиссу. / А. В. Зимаков // Научный диалог. — 2021. — № 10. — С. 359—377. — DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2021-10-359-377.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gudkov, I. V. (2020). “Ecologization” of economic relations in law (on the example of the energy industry). Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence, 5: 124—141. DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2020.046. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Исполинов А. С. Принципы автономности и приоритета права ЕС как оружие Суда Европейского союза в конфликте с инвестиционными арбитражами. Дело Achmea / А. С. Исполинов // Российский юридический журнал. — 2021. — № 2. — С. 56— 77. — DOI: 10.34076/20713797_2021_2_56.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gurova, I. P. (2016). Contradictions of the reform of investment agreements in the European Union. Economics, entrepreneurship and law, 3 (32): 303—314. DOI: 10.18334/epp.6.3.36154. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Конопляник А. А. Договор к Энергетической хартии : разрушить нельзя модернизировать / А. А. Конопляник // ЭКО : Всероссийский экономический журнал. — 2011. — № 2. — С. 118—136.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hajdu, G. (2020). Recent Investment Cases Against EU Member States: Europe’s Green Energy Policies Under Threat? Sociálne Vedy Z Perspektívy Mladých Vedeckých Pracovníkov, IV: 124—128. DOI: 10.34135/svpmvpIV.191014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Конопляник А. А. Россия и Энергетическая хартия: долгий и извилистый путь навстречу друг другу / А. А. Конопляник // ЭКО: Всероссийский экономический журнал. — 2010. — № 12. — С. 114—132.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hinrichsen, E. (2024). Reconciling International Climate Law and the Energy Charter Treaty through the Use of Integrative Interpretation in Arbitration. Laws, 13: P. 24. DOI: 10.3390/laws13020024.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кулинич А. Д. Регулирование прямых иностранных инвестиций в Европейском союзе / А. Д. Кулинич // Научно-аналитический вестник ИЕ РАН. — 2024. — № 1. — С. 53—63. — DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran120245363.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ispolinov, A. S. (2021). Principles of autonomy and priority of EU law as a weapon of the Court of the European Union in conflict with investment arbitrations. The Achmea case. Russian Law Journal, 2: 56—77. DOI: 10.34076/20713797_2021_2_56. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Макаренкова А. К. Регулирование инвестиционной деятельности в соглашениях ЕC о свободной торговле / А. К. Макаренкова // Право и управление. XXI век. — 2016. — № 3. — С. 78—86.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kehl, Ph., Wuschka, S. (2024). The Energy Charter Treaty at a Tipping Point — Modernization Efforts, Withdrawal Plans and their Legal Consequences. ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, 1: 59—90. DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2024-1-59.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Попов Е. В. Вызовы для международных инвесторов в контексте экологизации энергетики в ЕС : сравнительный обзор практики Германии / Е. В. Попов, А. В. Зимаков // Сравнительная политика. — 2021. — № 12. — С. 47—55. — DOI: 10.24412/22213279-2021-10039.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Konoplyanik, A. A. (2010). Russia and the Energy Charter: a long and winding path towards each other. ECO: All-Russian Economic Journal, 12: 114—132. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рачков И. В. Дело «ЮКОС против Российской Федерации» и вопрос о юрисдикционном иммунитете государства / И. В. Рачков, Н. А. Чурилина // Московский журнал международного права. — 2016. — № 3. — С. 49—67. — DOI: 10.24833/0869-0049-2016-3-49-67.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Konoplyanik, A. A. (2011). The Energy Charter Treaty: it cannot be destroyed to modernize. ECO: All-Russian Economic Journal, 2: 118—136. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шайдуллина В. К. Двусторонние договоры Европейского Союза и третьих стран в сфере защиты иностранных инвестиций : проблемы правоприменения / В. К. Шайдуллина // Общество : политика, экономика, право. — 2018. — № 3. — С. 80—83. — DOI: 10.24158/pep.2018.3.16.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kulinich, A. D. (2024). Regulation of foreign direct investment in the European Union. Scientific and Analytical Bulletin of the IE RAS, 1: 53—63. DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran120245363. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шиянов А. В. Основные направления модернизации инвестиционного режима договора к энергетической хартии / А. В. Шиянов // Вестник юридического факультета Южного федерального университета. — 2023. — № 3. — С. 42—49. — DOI: 10.18522/2313-6138-2023-10-3-6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Makarenkova, A. K. (2016). Regulation of investment activity in EU free trade agreements. Law and management. XXI century, 3: 78—86. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Belyi A. The Energy Charter process in the face of uncertainties / A. Belyi // The Journal of World Energy Law &amp; Business. — 2021. — Vol. 14. — Issue 5. — Pр. 363—375. — DOI: 10.1093/jwelb/jwab032.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nagy, C. I. (2019). Introduction: Intra-EU BITs after Achmea — A cross-cutting issue. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. 1—13. DOI: 10.4337/9781788115179.00009.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Braoudakis N. Neutralising the ECT Sunset Clause Inter Se / N. Braoudakis, R. Craveia, C. Baldon // ICSID Review — Foreign Investment Law Journal. — 2024. — Vol. 39. — Issue 1. — Pp. 7—8. — DOI: 10.1093/icsidreview/siae011.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Odermatt, J. (2021). Is EU Law International? Case C-741/19 Republic of Moldova v Komstroy LLC and the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order. European Papers, 6 (3): 1255—1268. DOI: 10.15166/2499-8249/522.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Damages and ISDS Reform : Between Procedure and Substance / J. Bonnitcha, M. Langford, J. Alvarez-Zarate, D. Behn // Journal of International Dispute Settlement. — 2023. — Vol. 14. — Issue 2. — Pр. 213—241. — DOI: 10.1093/jnlids/idab034.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popov, E. V., Zimakov, A. V. (2021). Challenges for international investors in the context of greening energy in the EU: a comparative review of German practice. Comparative Politics, 12: 47—55. DOI: 10.24412/2221-3279-2021-10039. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Energy Colonialism : A Category to Analyse the Corporate Energy Transition / J. Sánchez Contreras, A. M. Matarán Ruiz, A. Campos-Celador, E. M. Fjellheim // Land. — 2023. — Vol. 12. — Рp. 12—41. — DOI: 10.3390/land12061241.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rachkov, I. V. (2016). The case of YUKOS v. the Russian Federation and the issue of jurisdictional immunity of the state. Moscow Journal of International Law, 3: 49—67. DOI: 10.24833/0869-0049-2016-3-49-67. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hajdu G. Recent Investment Cases Against EU Member States : Europe’s Green Energy Policies Under Threat? / G. Hajdu // Sociálne Vedy Z Perspektívy Mladých Vedeckých Pracovníkov. — 2020. — Vol. IV. — Pp. 124—128. — DOI: 10.34135/svpmvpIV.191014.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Roiger-Simek, K. (2021). The Modernization of the Energy Charter Treaty: Dead in the Water? Austrian Review of International and European Law, 26: 121—146. DOI: 10.1163/15736512-02601005.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hinrichsen E. Reconciling International Climate Law and the Energy Charter Treaty through the Use of Integrative Interpretation in Arbitration / E. Hinrichsen // Laws. — 2024. — Vol. 13. — P. 24. — DOI: 10.3390/laws13020024.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sánchez Contreras, J., Matarán Ruiz, A. M., Campos-Celador, A., Fjellheim, E. M. (2023). Energy Colonialism: A Category to Analyse the Corporate Energy Transition. Land, 12: 12—41. DOI: 10.3390/land12061241.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kehl Ph. The Energy Charter Treaty at a Tipping Point — Modernization Efforts, Withdrawal Plans and their Legal Consequences / Ph. Kehl, S. Wuschka // ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien. — 2024. — № 1. — Рр. 59—90. — DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2024-1-59.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shaidullina, V. K. (2018). Bilateral treaties of the European Union and third countries in the field of protection of foreign investments: problems of law enforcement. Society: politics, economics, law, 3: 80—83. DOI: 10.24158/pep.2018.3.16. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nagy C. I. Introduction : Intra-EU BITs after Achmea — A cross-cutting issue / C. I. Nagy. — Cheltenham, UK : Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019. — Pp. 1—13. — DOI: 10.4337/9781788115179.00009.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shiyanov, A. V. (2023). The main directions of modernization of the investment regime of the Energy Charter treaty. Bulletin of the Faculty of Law of the Southern Federal University, 3: 42—49. DOI: 10.18522/2313-6138-2023-10-3-6. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Odermatt J. Is EU Law International? Case C-741/19 Republic of Moldova v Komstroy LLC and the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order / J. Odermatt // European Papers. — 2021. — Vol. 6. — № 3. — Рp. 1255—1268. — DOI: 10.15166/2499-8249/522.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tienhaara, K., Cotula, L. (2020). Raising the cost of climate action? Investor-state dispute settlement and compensation for stranded fossil fuel assets. London: IIED. 59 р.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Roiger-Simek K. The Modernization of the Energy Charter Treaty : Dead in the Water? / К. Roiger-Simek // Austrian Review of International and European Law. — 2021. — Vol. 26. — Рp. 121—146. — DOI: 10.1163/15736512-02601005.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Titi, C. (2015). International Investment Law and the European Union: Towards a New Generation of International Investment Agreements. The European Journal of International Law, 26 (3): 639—661. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chv040.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tienhaara K. Raising the cost of climate action? Investor-state dispute settlement and compensation for stranded fossil fuel assets / K. Tienhaara, L. Cotula. — London : IIED, 2020. — 59 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vaaranmaa, O. (2021). The Energy Charter Treaty, Frivolous Claims and the Looming Threat of Investor-state Dispute Settlement: Any Hope from the EU’s Modernisation Proposal? Groningen Journal of International Law, 8 (2): 270—287. DOI: 10.21827/GroJIL.8.2.270-287.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Titi C. International Investment Law and the European Union : Towards a New Generation of International Investment Agreements / C. Titi // The European Journal of International Law. — 2015. — Vol. 26. — № 3. — Рр. 639—661. — DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chv040.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Víg, Z. (2022). Legitimate expectations in the arbitral practice of green energy cases under the Energy Charter Treaty. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 62 (2): 115—130. DOI: 10.1556/2052.2022.00347.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vaaranmaa O. The Energy Charter Treaty, Frivolous Claims and the Looming Threat of Investor-state Dispute Settlement : Any Hope from the EU’s Modernisation Proposal? / O. Vaaranmaa // Groningen Journal of International Law. — 2021. — Vol. 8. — № 2. — Рр. 270—287. — DOI: 10.21827/GroJIL.8.2.270-287.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zimakov, A. V. (2021). Germany’s Nuclear Energy Refusal Policy: from Conflict to Compromise. Nauchnyi dialog, 10: 359—377. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-202110-359-377 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Víg Z. Legitimate expectations in the arbitral practice of green energy cases under the Energy Charter Treaty / Z. Víg // Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies. — 2022. — Vol. 62. — № 2. — Рр. 115—130. — DOI: 10.1556/2052.2022.00347.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zimakov, A. V. (2017). Is there a future for coal-fired thermal power plants in Europe? Bulletin of MGIMO University, 5 (56): 130—150. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2017-5-56130-150. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
