Preposition Repetition in Phrases with Homogeneous Parts of a Sentence in Business Texts of the 18th Century
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-8-171-184
Abstract
The question of dialect differences in the use of homogeneous parts of a sentence and prepositions in business texts of the 18th century is considered. Attention is paid to the factors that influenced the preposition repetition in such groups. The results of comparative analysis of peripheral (in particular, Chelyabinsk) and Moscow business texts of the 18th century are presented. The question is raised whether the syntactic role of words in the group under study affected the preposition repetition. Special attention is paid to the duplication of the preposition in a number of stable expressions typical for the business usage of the 18th century. For the first time, the task is to identify differences in the use of repeated prepositions in business texts that relate to different territories. The relevance of the research is due to the fact that it draws readers’ attention to a new aspect in the history of the formation of Russian language norms. It is proved that in the business texts of the 18th century, which have different origins, territorial affiliation was not a decisive factor. The author points out that along with the place where the document was written, the author’s preferences, the functioning of prepositions in formula expressions, the syntactic role of homogeneous members, and the genre of the document may have influenced the duplication of the preposition.
About the Author
A. S. Ulitova
Non-state private educational institution of higher professional education “Moscow University for Industry and Finance “Synergy”;
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Philology, associate professor, Department of Russian Language and Literature; research scientist, Department of Old Russian Language
Moscow
References
1. Ulitova, A. S. (2019). Povtor predlogov pri odnorodnykh chlenakh v tekstakh XVII—XVIII vv. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 4: 241—247. (In Russ.).
2. Buyakova, M. V. (2009). Sochineniye i podchineniye v stikhe i proze v russkom i frantsuzskom yazykakh: avtoreferat dissertatsii… kandidata filologicheskikh nauk. Moskva. (In Russ.).
3. Ulitova, A. S. (2019). Povtor predlogov pri odnorodnykh chlenakh v knizhnykh i neknizhnykh tekstakh XVII v. In: Rusistika v XXI veke: tendentsii i napravleniya razvitiya: sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Erevan: EGU. 220—223. (In Russ.).
4. Filin, F. P. (2006). Proiskhozhdeniye russkogo, ukrainskogo i belorusskogo yazykov: istoriko-dialektologicheskiy ocherk. Moskva: KomKniga. (In Russ.).
5. Vykhrystyuk, M. S., Okmyanskaya, A. V. (2013). Modeli razgovornogo sintaksisa tekstov deloproizvodstva Tobolskogo Znamenskogo muzhskogo monastyrya vtoroy poloviny XVIII veka. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 29(320): 21—23. (In Russ.).
6. Glinkina, N. A. (ed.). (2005). Chelyabinskaya starina, 4: Dokumenty Chelyabinskogo dukhovnogo pravleniya posledney chetverti XVIII veka, soderzhashchie svedeniya o staroobryadtsakh Chelyabinskoy okrugi. Chelyabinsk: Poligraf-Master. (In Russ.).
7. Zaliznyak, A. A. (2004). Drevnenovgorodskiy dialekt. Moskva: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury. (In Russ.).
8. Glinkina, N. A. (ed.). (2006). Chelyabinskaya starina, 6: Delovyye dokumenty Chelyabinskogo dukhovnogo pravleniya posledney chetverti XVIII veka. Chelyabinsk: Poligraf-Master. (In Russ.).
9. Gorodskaya semya XVIII veka: semeyno-pravovyye akty kuptsov i raznochintsev Moskvy. (2002). Moskva: URSS. (In Russ.).
10. Hill, S. (1977). The N-Factor and Russian Prepositions: Their Development in XI—XXth century. Hague, Paris, New York: Mouton.
11. Khorgoshi, E. (1978). Nekotoryye osobennosti predlogov drevnerusskogo yazyka (na materiale pamyatnikov XI—XII vv.). Dissertationes Slavicae (Acta Universitates Szegedensis de Attila Jozsef Nominatae), 8: 117—125. Available a: http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/1201/1/dissert_slav_ling_015_117-125.pdf. (In Russ.).
12. Klenin, E. (1989). On preposition repetition: A study in the history of syntactic government in Old Russian. Russian linguistics, 13: 185—296.
13. Klimovskaya, I. I. (1965.). O nekotorykh posledstviyakh inversii iskonno postpozitivnogo opredeleniya v istorii russkogo yazyka. Uchenyye zapiski Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 54: 78—93. (In Russ.).
14. Lomonosov, M. V. (1952). Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy, 7: Trudy po filologii. 1739—1758 gg. Moskva; Leningrad: Izdatelstvo akademii nauk SSSR. (In Russ.).
15. Mayorov, A. P. (2007). Regionalnyy uzus delovoy pis’mennosti XVIII veka (po pamyatnikam Zabaykalya): disertatsiya… doktora filologicheskikh nauk. Moskva: MGOU. (In Russ.).
16. Minlos, F. R. (2007). Povtor predlogov v Novgorodskoy pervoy letopisi. Russkiy yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, 1: 52—72. (In Russ.).
17. Raevskaya, M. V. (2014). Iz istorii funktsionirovaniya predloga po v delovykh dokumentakh vtoroy poloviny XVIII — nachala XIX v. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya. Lingvistika, 11/4: 10—13. (In Russ.).
18. Rozental, D. E. (1997). Spravochnik po pravopisaniyu i stilistike. Moskva: Komplekt. (In Russ.).
19. Sannikov, V. Z. (2009). Russkiy sintaksis v semantiko-pragmaticheskom prostranstve. Moskva: Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur. (In Russ.).
20. Satyukova, D. N. (2015). O povtore predlogov pered odnorodnymi opredeleniyami v sovremennom russkom yazyke: opyt korpusnogo analiza. Acta Linguistica Petropoli-tana: trudy Instituta lingvisticheskikh issledovaniy RAN, 11 (1): 468—512. (In Russ.).
21. Stetsenko, A. N. (1972). Istoricheskiy sintaksis russkogo yazyka. Moskva: Vysshaya shkola. (In Russ.).
22. Trakhtenberg, O. M. (1982). O konstruktsiyakh s povtoreniem znamenatelnykh slov i predlogov (na materiale khudozhestvennykh proizvedeniy XVIII—XIX vv. In: Materialy po russko-slavyanskomu yazykoznaniyu. Voronezh. 131—137. (In Russ.).
23. Tszintin, S. (2020). Povtor predlogov kak stilisticheskiy priem (na primere skazok iz sbornika A. N. Afanasyeva). Baltiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal, 9/1 (30). 306—311. (In Russ.).
24. Ulitova, A. S. (2019). Povtor predlogov pri odnorodnykh chlenakh v tekstakh XVII—XVIII vv. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 4: 241—247. (In Russ.).
25. Ulitova, A. S. (2019). Povtor predlogov pri odnorodnykh chlenakh v knizhnykh i neknizhnykh tekstakh XVII v. In: Rusistika v XXI veke: tendentsii i napravleniya razvitiya: sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii. Erevan: EGU. 220—223. (In Russ.).
26. Vykhrystyuk, M. S., Okmyanskaya, A. V. (2013). Modeli razgovornogo sintaksisa tekstov deloproizvodstva Tobolskogo Znamenskogo muzhskogo monastyrya vtoroy poloviny XVIII veka. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 29(320): 21—23. (In Russ.).
27. Zaliznyak, A. A. (2004). Drevnenovgorodskiy dialekt. Moskva: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Ulitova A.S. Preposition Repetition in Phrases with Homogeneous Parts of a Sentence in Business Texts of the 18th Century. Nauchnyi dialog. 2020;(8):171-184. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-8-171-184
Views:
673
Email this article 