Verbalization of Bacchic Actions in the Artistic World of Fyodor Abramov
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-12-39-53
Abstract
The features of verbalization of Bacchic actions in the works of Fyodor Abramov (tetralogy “Brothers and Sisters”, novels “Pelageya”, “Alka”, “Mamonikha”, “Wooden Horses” and stories) are considered. The linguistic means of the individual author’s interpretation of the “Wine Drinking” sphere as a fragment of the semantic field of a literary text are analyzed. Bacchic action from the point of view of manifestation of one or another cultural semantics in it (according to M. L. Kovshova): utilitarian, functional, aesthetic, social hierarchical, ideological and spiritual is studied. It is noted that in the artistic world of Abramov, the utilitarian and functional aspects generally correspond to the general cultural ones, reflected in the paremias. It was revealed that the social-hierarchical cultural layer has its own specificity, which manifests itself in two oppositions: “village — city”, “collective farmer-peasant — rural intellectuals”. The author notes that the ideological and spiritual component in understanding the situation of wine drinking is associated with the expression of the author’s attitude, his worldview through the prism of the character’s opinion. It is concluded that the verbalization of Bacchic action is distinguished by figurative interpretation, the attraction of components from various spheres: the use of expressions containing somatisms, animalisms, perceptual vocabulary, verbs of physical impact, etc. When analyzing the social component of some Bacchic expressions, it is noted that the objects of wine drinking (vessels) are interpreted as subjects of interpersonal relationships.
About the Author
O. A. DimitrievaRussian Federation
Olga A. Dimitrieva, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Russian and Chuvash Languages; senior researcher, Research Institute of Ethnopedagogy named after Academician RAO G. N. Volkov
ResearcherID AAZ-3038-2020, SPIN 9686-0190
Cheboksary
References
1. Bolotnova, N. S. (2005). Leksicheskiye sredstva reprezentatsii khudozhestvennykh kontseptov v poeticheskom tekste [Lexical means of representing artistic concepts in a poetic text]. Vestnik TGPU [Bulletin of TSPU], 3 (47): 18–24. (In Russ.).
2. Dimitrieva, O. A. (2019a). Khudozhestvennaya interpretatsiya kontsepta VINOPITIE v serii detektivnykh romanov Borisa Akunina «Priklyucheniya Erasta Fandorina» [Artistic interpretation of the concept of wine drinking in a series of detective novels by Boris Akunin “The Adventures of Erast Fandorin”]. Nauchnyi dialog [Scientific dialogue], 9: 56—72. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2019-9-56-72. (In Russ.).
3. Dimitrieva, O. A. (2019b). «V Rossii pyanyye lyudi u nas samye dobrye…» (Ob obraze pyanogo cheloveka v proizvedeniyakh F. M. Dostoevskogo) [“In Russia, drunk people we have the kindest...” (On the image of a drunk man in the works of FM Dostoevsky)]. Mir russkogo slova [World of the Russian word], 3: 56—61. DOI: 10.24411/1811-16292019-13056. (In Russ.).
4. Dimitrieva, O. A. (2020). Reprezentatsiya situatsii vinopitiya v khudozhestvennom mire Fedora Abramova [Representation of the situation of wine drinking in the artistic world of Fyodor Abramov]. Rusistika bez granits [Russistics without borders], 3: 43—50. (In Russ.).
5. Karasik, V. I., Slyshkin, G. G. (2005). Bazovyye kharakteristiki lingvokulturnykh kontseptov [Basic characteristics of linguocultural concepts]. In: Antologiya kontseptov [Anthology of concepts.], 1. Volgograd: Paradigma. 13—15. (In Russ.).
6. Kovshova, M. L. (2015). Semantika golovnogo ubora v kulture i yazyke. Kostyumnyy kod kultury [Semantics of a headdress in culture and language. Costume code of culture]. Moskva: Gnozis. 368 p. (In Russ.).
7. Miller, L. V. (2000). Khudozhestvennyy kontsept kak smyslovaya i esteticheskaya kategoriya [Art concept as a semantic and aesthetic category]. Mir russkogo slova [World of the Russian word], 4: 39—45. (In Russ.).
8. Miller, L. V. (2004.). Lingvokognitivnyye mekhanizmy formirovaniya khudozhestvennoy kartiny mira: na materiale russkoy literatury: author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. [Linguocognitive mechanisms of the formation of an artistic picture of the world: on the material of Russian literature: author’s abstract of Doct. Diss]. Sankt-Peterburg. 44 p. (In Russ.).
9. Petrov, A. V. (2020). Rodnikovoye slovo Fedora Abramova: k 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Fedora Aleksandrovicha Abramova [Spring’s word of Fyodor Abramov: to the 100th anniversary of the birth of Fyodor Alexandrovich Abramov]. Arkhangelsk: KIRA. 172 p. (In Russ.).
10. Petrov, A. V. (2020). Vyrazitelnyy potentsial dialektizmov v proze Fedora Abramova (k 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya) [The expressive potential of dialectisms in the prose of Fyodor Abramov (to the 100th anniversary of his birth)]. Russkiy yazyk v shkole [Russian language at school], 81 (1): 53—60. DOI: 10.30515/0131-6141-2020-81-1-53-60. (In Russ.).
11. Saygin, V. V. (2019). Mifologizatsiya kontsepta «grekh» kak otrazhenie osobennostey ego reprezentatsii v russkoy yazykovoy kartine mira [Mythologization of the concept “sinˮ as a reflection of the peculiarities of its representation in the Russian linguistic picture of the world]. In: Russkoye slovo v mnogoyazychnom mire: materialy XIV Kongressa MAPRYaL (g. Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan, 29 aprelya — 3 maya 2019 goda) [Russian word in the multilingual world]. Sankt-Peterburg: MAPRYaL. 540—544. (In Russ.).
12. Severskaya, O. I. (2008). Pochemu bezbiletnikov nazyvayut zaytsami [Why free riders are called hares]. Russkiy yazyk [Russian language], 14(566). Available at: https://rus.1sept.ru/view_article.php?ID=200801413 (accessed: 30.11.2020). (In Russ.).
13. Stepanov, Yu. S. (1997). Konstanty. Slovar’ russkoy kultury: opyt issledovaniya [Constants. Dictionary of Russian culture: research experience]. Moskva: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury. 825 p. (In Russ.).
14. Tarasova, G. I. (2019). Zapechatlennoye slovo naroda [The captured word of the people]. Filologiya i kultura [Philology and culture], 3 (57): 188—191. DOI: 10.26907/2074-0239-201957-3-188-191. (In Russ.).
15. Tuktangulova, E. V. (2005). Reprezentatsiya khudozhestvennogo kontsepta «zhizn’» v idiostile N. A. Zabolotskogo (na materiale tsikla «Gorodskie stolbtsy») [Representation of the artistic concept “life" in the idiostyle of N. A. Zabolotsky (based on the cycle “City columns")]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Udmurt University], 5 (2): 53—56. (In Russ.).
16. Vinogradov, V. V. (1968). O serii vyrazheniy: mukhu zashibat’, mukhu zadavit’, mukhu razdavit’, mukhu ubit’, s mukhoy, pod mukhoy [About a series of expressions: hitting a fly, crushing a fly, crushing a fly, killing a fly, with a fly, under a fly]. Russkaya rech [Russian speech], 1: 83–90. (In Russ.).
17. Vorkachev, S. G. (2005). Postulaty lingvokontseptologii [Postulates of linguoconceptology]. In: Antologiya kontseptov [Anthology of concepts], 1. Volgograd: Paradigma. 10—13. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Dimitrieva O.A. Verbalization of Bacchic Actions in the Artistic World of Fyodor Abramov. Nauchnyi dialog. 2020;(12):39-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-12-39-53