Creative Works of S. Beckett in the Context of “Notes from the Underground” by F. M. Dostoevsky
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-12-174-184
Abstract
The results of a comparative analysis of the story “Notes from the Underground” by F. M. Dostoevsky and the works of S. Beckett are presented in the article. It is shown how Beckett critically interprets the main novels of the Russian writer. The novelty of the work is seen in the fact that the problem of Beckett as the “heir” of Dostoevsky and his “Notes from the Underground” is considered in Russian literary criticism for almost the fi time. Based on the plays “Waiting for Godot”, “All that Fall”, the novel “Molloy” and the story “First Love”, the author demonstrates how Dostoevsky’s themes, motives and images are refracted in Beckett’s work. Particular attention is paid to the motive of “underground” love. A similarity was found between Dostoevsky’s story and Beckett’s works in spatial and temporal characteristics (uncertainty of the scene, nonlinearity of time, repetition of situations). It has been proven that these characteristics serve to designate a world without God, in which landmarks and goals are lost, positive and rational foundations are broken. It has been established that for Dostoevsky the Underground remains a “dark corner” behind which there is a “big world”, while for Beckett it fi the whole world.
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No. 18-012-90044 Dostoevsky “Notes from the Underground” F. M. Dostoevsky and the problem of the “underground man” in the culture of Europe and America at the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 21st centuries”.
About the Author
E. A. Markova
A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences;
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina A. Markova, PhD in Philology, Senior Researcher, A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Assistant, Department of Russian and Foreign Literature, RUDN
ResearcherID AAF-6782-2019, SPIN 1215-5391
References
1. Ayers, C. (1998). An Interpretative Dialogue: “First Love” and Bakhtin’s Categories of Meaning. In: Beckett Versus Beckett, 7. Amsterdam; Atlanta (GA): Rodopi. 391—406. ISBN 9789042007543.
2. Buzina, T. V. (2011). Samoobozheniye melkogo besa v «Zapiskakh iz podpol’ya» F. M. Dostoevskogo [Self-deification of a petty demon in “Notes from the Undergroundˮ by F M Dostoevsky]. Vestnik LGU im A. S. Pushkina [Bulletin of Leningrad State University named after A. Pushkin], 1: 22—30. (In Russ.).
3. Esslin, M. (2010). Teatr absurda [Theater of the absurd]. Sankt-Peterburg: Baltiyskiye sezony. 527 p. ISBN 978-5-903368-40-2.
4. Hoffman, F. (1962). Samuel Beckett: The Language of self. Carbondale (IL): Southern Illinois University Press. 200 p.
5. Kasatkina, T. A. (2019). Dostoevskiy kak filosof i bogoslov: khudozhestvennyy sposob vyskazyvaniya [Dostoevsky as a philosopher and theologian: an artistic way of expressing]. Moskva: Vodoley. 336 p. ISBN 978-5-91763-488-3. (In Russ.).
6. Keler, K. (2007). Antigeroy u Dostoevskogo, Semyuelya Bekketa i Yudzhina O‘Nila [Antihero in Dostoevsky, Samuel Beckett and Eugene O’Neill]. In: Dostoevskiy: materialy i issledovaniya [Dostoevsky: materials and research]. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka. 274—280. ISBN 978-5-02-026501-1. (In Russ.).
7. Kennedy, A. K. (1989). Samuel Beckett. Cambridge: CUP. 175 p. ISBN 9780521274883.
8. Krinitsyn, A. B. (2001). Ispoved’ podpolnogo cheloveka: k antropologii F. M. Dostoevskogo [Confessions of an underground man: to the anthropology of F M Dostoevsky]. Moskva: Maks Press. 370 p. ISBN 5-317-00273-7. (In Russ.).
9. Le Juez, B. (2010). Beckett Before Beckett: Samuel Beckett’s Lectures on French Literature. London: Souvenir Press. 96 p. ISBN 9780285638624.
10. Levy, E. P. (1980). Beckett and the Voice of Species: A Study of the Prose Fiction. Totowa (NJ): Barnes & Noble Books. 145 p. ISBN 9780389200048.
11. Mikeladze, N. E. (2014). Tri pritchi Tsarstviya Nebesnogo v pyese S. Bekketa «V ozhidanii Godo» [Three parables of the Kingdom of Heaven in the play by S. Beckett “Waiting for Godotˮ]. Mediaskop [Mediakop], 2. Available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/1534 (accessed: 23.11.2020). (In Russ.).
12. Rosen, S. J. (1976). Samuel Beckett and the Pessimistic Tradition. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers University Press. 252 p. ISBN 9780813508092.
13. Tarasov, B. N. (2019). «Zakon Ya» i «zakon lyubvi» v antropologii khristianskogo realizma F. M. Dostoevskogo i ekzistentsialistskogo gumanizma Zh.-P. Sartra [“The law of I” and “the law of love” in the anthropology of Christian realism by F. M. Dostoevsky and the existentialist humanism of J.-P. Sartre]. Vestnik Russkoy khristianskoy gumanitarnoy akademii [Bulletin of the Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities], 2: 112—125. DOI: 10.25991/VRHGA.2019.20.3.011. (In Russ.).
14. Webb, E. (1970). Samuel Beckett: A Study of His Novels. Seattle (WA): University of Washington Press. 192 p. ISBN 9780295950594.
15. Zhivolupova, N. V. (2016). Pokayannyy psalom, ispoved’ i teoditseya kak istochniki vnutrenney formy ispovedi antigeroya [Penitential psalm, confession and theodicy as sources of the internal form of antihero confession]. Yazyk. Kultura. Kommunikatsiya [Language. Culture. Communication], 1: 190—199. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Markova E.A. Creative Works of S. Beckett in the Context of “Notes from the Underground” by F. M. Dostoevsky. Nauchnyi dialog. 2020;(12):174-184. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-12-174-184
Views:
589
Email this article 