Ural Officials in the District Town of the First Half of the 1870s (Diary of a Servant of the Ural Landowners Golubtsov)
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-1-306-319
Abstract
The features of the formation of the appearance of a provincial district society are analyzed on the example of the Ural district town of Krasnoufimsk, Perm province. The factors that influenced the changes taking place in the bureaucratic environment in the first half of the 1870s are considered, the composition of Krasnoufimsk district officials is presented. The study was carried out on the basis of data recorded by the former serf of the Perm landowners Golubtsovs Matvey Andreev in the published Diary. Through the eyes of a representative of a different class, some aspects of the relationship between the Krasnoufimsk bureaucratic district society and the representative of the upper noble class V. P. Golubtsov (1832—1887) are shown. It is indicated that the information contained in the Diary testifies to the changes taking place in society associated with the erosion of its composition and the weakening of the influence of officials in the space of the county town, when the content component of the previously formed traditions changes by introducing new models of behavior by representatives of other classes. The relevance of the study is seen in the importance of studying the socio-cultural space of the provincial city in general and the Ural in particular, which had its own specific features that influenced the formation of urban society. It is concluded that although only some socio-cultural aspects of the life of a provincial society are shown, their identification and study will help to better understand what important processes took place in society during the post-reform period.
About the Author
M. B. Larionova
Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education “Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina B. Larionova, PhD in History, Associate Professor
Yekaterinburg
References
1. Alevras, N. N. (2009). Spetsifika provintsialnogo sotsiuma dorevolyutsionnogo Urala v rakurse sotsiokulturnykh protsessov XVIII — nachala XX Veka [Specificity of the provincial society of the pre-revolutionary Urals in the perspective of socio-cultural processes of the XVIII-early XX Century]. Magistra vitae: elektronnyy zhurnal po istoricheskim naukam i arkheologii [Magistra vitae: electronic journal of historical sciences and archeology], 16 (154): 26—37. (In Russ.).
2. Butusova, A. A. (2006). Provintsialnoye chinovnichestvo Rossii v 1861—1917 gg.: na primere Kurskoy gubernii. PhD Diss. [Provincial officialdom of Russia in 1861—1917: on the example of the Kursk province. PhD Diss.]. Kurgan. 183 p. (In Russ.).
3. Dashkevich, L. A., Larionova, M. B., Neklyudov, E. G., Shalina, I. V. (2015). Povsednevnaya zhizn’ provintsialnogo imeniya: dnevnik slugi uralskikh pomeshchikov Golubtsovykh [Everyday life of a provincial estate: diary of a servant of the Ural landowners Golubtsov]. Quaestio rossica [Quaestio rossica], 1: 255—274. (In Russ.).
4. Ershov, M. F. (2015). Sotsiokulturnaya evolyutsiya gorodov Severnogo Zauralya v dorevolyutsionnyy period: sravnitelnyy analiz [Sociocultural evolution of cities of the Northern Trans-Urals in the pre-revolutionary period: comparative analysis]. Vestnik ugrovedeniya [Vestnik ugrovedeniya], 4 (23): 79—90. (In Russ.).
5. Guseva, T. M. (2012). Gorodskiye sosloviya i formirovaniye sotsiokulturnoy sredy uyezdnykh gorodov Srednego Povolzhya vo vtoroy polovine XIX — nachale XX v. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. [Urban estates and the formation of the socio-cultural environment of the district cities of the Middle Volga region in the second half of the XIX — early XX century. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss.]. Samara. 44 p. (In Russ.).
6. Kazakova-Apkarimova, E. Yu. (2011). Formirovaniye sfery grazhdanskoy deyatelnosti v uralskom gorode vo vtoroy polovine XIX — nachale XX v. Doct. Diss. [Formation of the sphere of civil activity in the Ural city in the second half of the XIX — early XX century. Doct. Diss.]. Ekaterinburg. 654 p. (In Russ.).
7. Kobozeva, Z. M. (2014). Meshchanskaya povsednevnost’ provintsialnykh gorodov Rossii vo vtoroy polovine XIX — nachale XX v. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. [Meshchanskaya everyday life of provincial cities of Russia in the second half of the XIX — early XX century. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss.]. Saratov. 22 p. (In Russ.).
8. Larionova, M. B. (2013). Dvoryane Permskoy gubernii v XVIII — nachale XX veka: chislennost’, sostav, zemelnaya sobstvennost’ [Nobles of the Perm province in the XVIII — early XX century: number, composition, land ownership]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Istoriya [Bulletin of the Perm University. History], 2 (22): 18—34. (In Russ.).
9. Lyubina, T. I. (1998). Uyezdnoye chinovnichestvo Tverskoy gubernii v kontse XIX — nachale XX v. Author’s abstract of PhD. Diss. [Uyezdnoe officialdom Tver province in the late XIX — early XX century. Author’s abstract of PhD. Diss.]. Tver’. 25 p. (In Russ.).
10. Minenko, N. A., Apkarimova, E. Yu., Golikova, S. V. (2006). Povsednevnaya zhizn’ uralskogo goroda v XVIII — nachale XX v. [Everyday life of the Ural city in the XVIII — early XX century]. Moskva: NAUKA. 384 p. ISBN 5-02-035153-9. (In Russ.).
11. Popp, I. A. (2014). Mirovoy sudya Vladimir Platonovich Golubtsov: k voprosu o deyatelnosti pochetnykh mirovykh sudey [World judge Vladimir Platonovich Golubtsov: to the question of the activity of honorary world judges]. Mirovoy sudya [World Judge], 10: 18—23. (In Russ.).
12. Smakhtina, M. V. (2008). Russkoye pomestnoye dvoryanstvo v XIX v.: Evolyutsiya eticheskikh norm, predstavleniy i praktiki v sotsialnoy i ekonomicheskoy sferakh. Author’s abstract of PhD. Diss. [Russian local nobility in the XIX century: The evolution of ethical norms, ideas and practices in social and economic spheres. Author’s abstract of PhD. Diss.]. Moskva. 24 p. (In Russ.).
13. Shatokhin, I. T., Titova, A. A. (2015). Staroye i novoye v zhizni provintsialnogo chinovnichestva v period burzhuaznoy modernizatsii Rossiyskoy imperii [Old and new in the life of provincial officialdom in the period of bourgeois modernization of the Russian Empire]. Tractus aevorum: evolyutsiya sotsiokulturnykh i politicheskikh prostranstv [Tractus aevorum: evolution of socio-cultural and political spaces], 2 (1): 88—104. (In Russ.).
14. Shestakov, M. V. (2015). Provintsialnoye dvoryanstvo kak istochnik formirovaniya mestnoy byurokratii v XVIII — pervoy polovine XIX v. (na primere Tambovskoy gubernii) [Provincial nobility as a source of formation of local bureaucracy in the XVIII — first half of the XIX century. (on the example of the Tambov province)]. Aktualnyye voprosy obshchestvennykh nauk: sotsiologiya, politologiya, filosofiya, istoriya [Actual issues of social sciences: sociology, political science, philosophy, history], 52: 68—79. (In Russ.).
15. Smirnova, K. K. (2006). Dvoryanskiye chinovniki v uyezdnykh i zemskikh sudakh Ssankt-peterburgskoy gubernii (pervaya chetvert’ XIX v.) [Noble officials in the district and zemstvo courts of the Ssankt-Petersburg province (the first quarter of the XIX century)]. Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni A. I. Gertsena [Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni A. I. Herzen], 4 (22): 124—129. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Larionova M.B. Ural Officials in the District Town of the First Half of the 1870s (Diary of a Servant of the Ural Landowners Golubtsov). Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(1):306-319. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-1-306-319
Views:
511
Email this article 