Branched Linguistic Analysis as a Tool for Identifying Attributes Montage’s of Phonograms
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-2-62-78
Abstract
The issues of a branched linguistic analysis of sounding texts for the presence / absence of editing signs or other changes made during the recording process or after its completion on phonograms containing these texts is discussed in the article. The relevance of the work is due to the rapid development of digital technologies for the fixation, analysis and processing of sound (primarily speech) signals and the use of these technologies for the purpose of falsifying phonograms. Particular attention in the work offered to readers is paid to highlighting those theoretical foundations that serve as the basis of the linguistic part of a comprehensive study of sound recordings in relation to their authenticity. The material for the study offered to the readers' attention was a set of sounding texts of those phonograms of Russian speech that were involved in the field of operational-search activity, investigation and legal proceedings as a source of evidence. The author dwells in detail on the issues of a branched linguistic analysis of these texts, consistently analyzes from a theoretical point of view the constituent stages of such a forensic study, shows the role of the linguistic part of the expertise in the integral complex study of sound recordings from the point of view of their integrity.
About the Author
A. Sh. Kaganov
Federal State Institution of Science Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander Sh. Kaganov, PhD in Technical Science, Senior Researcher
Moscow
References
1. Bryzgunova, E. A. (1977). Zvuki i intonatsiya russkoy rechi [Sounds and intonation of Russian speech]. Moskva: Russkiy yazyk. 281 p. (In Russ.).
2. FZ № 73— O gosudarstvennoy sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatelnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: federalnyy zakon ot 31 maya 2001 g. № 73-FZ. [On state forensic expertise in the Russian Federation: Federal Law of May 31, 2001 No. 73-FZ].
3. Galyashina, E. I. (2001). Osobennosti lingvisticheskogo analiza pri ustanovlenii fakta montazha fonogramm [Features of linguistic analysis when establishing the fact of mounting phonograms]. In: Informatizatsiya pravookhranitelnykh sistem: sbornik trudov X Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii [Informatization of law enforcement systems: collection of proceedings of the X International Scientific Conference]. Moskva: Akademiya upravleniya MVD Rossii. 332—335. (In Russ.).
4. Kaganov, A. Sh. (2005). Kriminalisticheskaya ekspertiza zvukozapisey [Forensic examination of sound recordings]. Moskva: Yurlitinform. 272 p. (In Russ.).
5. Kaganov, A. Sh., Nazin, L. F. (2014). Kriminalisticheskaya ekspertiza video- i zvukozapisey: kratkaya entsiklopediya [Forensic examination of video and sound recordings: a short encyclopedia]. Moskva: Yurlitinform. 280 p.
6. Koldin, V. Ya. (2007). Kriminalisticheskaya identifikatsiya i poiskovo-identifikatsionnaya deyatelnost’ [Forensic identification and search and identification activity]. In: Kriminalistika: informatsionnyye tekhnologii dokazyvaniya [Criminalistics: information technologies of proof]. Moskva: Zertsalo-M. 752 p. (In Russ.).
7. Krinov, S. N. (1996). Resheniyye voprosov o montazhe fonogramm v ekspertnoy praktike [Solution of questions about the editing of phonograms in expert practice]. In: Informatizatsiya pravookhranitelnykh sistem: tezisy dokladov Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii [Informatization of law enforcement systems: abstracts of the International conference]. Moskva: Akademiya upravleniya MVD Rossii. 179—181. (In Russ.).
8. Levi, A. A., Gorinov, Yu. A. (1983). Zvukozapis’ i videozapis' v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Sound recording and video recording in criminal proceedings]. Moskva: Yuridicheskaya literatura. 109 p. (In Russ.).
9. Morozov, V. P. (2011). Neverbalnaya kommunikatsiya: eksperimentalno-psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya [Non-verbal communication: experimental psychological research]. Moskva: Institut psikhologii RAN. 528 p. (In Russ.).
10. Orlova, V. F. (1997). Osnovy sudebnoy ekspertizy [Fundamentals of forensic examination]. Moskva: RFTsSE. 430 p. (In Russ.).
11. Pashuk, N. S. (2010). Psikhologiya rechi [Psychology of speech]. Minsk: MIU. 296 p. (In Russ.).
12. Ramishvili, G. S., Chikoidze, G. B. (1991). Kriminalisticheskoye issledovaniye fonogramm rechi i identifikatsiya lichnosti govoryashchego [Forensic research of phonograms of speech and identification of the speaker’s personality]. Tbilisi: Metsniereba. 266 p. (In Russ.).
13. Shlyakhov, A. R. (1979). Sudebnaya ekspertiza: organizatsii i provedeniye [Forensic examination: organization and conduct]. Moskva: Yuridicheskaya literatura. 168 p. (In Russ.).
14. Yartseva, V. N. (ed.). (1990). Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary]. Moskva: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya. 685 p. (In Russ.).
15. Zubov, G. N., Koval, S. L. (2003). Metody i sredstva obnaruzheniya narusheniy autentichnosti fonogramm [Methods and means of detecting violations of the authenticity of phonograms]. In: Sbornik metodicheskikh rekomendatsiy [Collection of guidelines]. Sankt-Peterburg: Tsentr rechevykh tekhnologiy. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kaganov A.Sh. Branched Linguistic Analysis as a Tool for Identifying Attributes Montage’s of Phonograms. Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(2):62-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-2-62-78
Views:
490
Email this article 