Family Chronicle Traditions in Contemporary Far Eastern Literature
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-5-155-168
Abstract
The questions of the content and genre poetics of the works of the Khabarovsk writers V. V. Sukachev (“At the hearth”) and T. I. Gladkikh (“Amur Cossacks Korenevs”) are considered. The relevance ofthe study is due to the value of the literary and regional studies material for the formation of a holistic picture of the national historical and literary process. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that the work of the named authors has practically not been studied, and their works, considered in the article, for the first time became the subject of literary study. Attention is paid to the themes and problems of the works that reveal the tragic events of the national history of the twentieth century: the deportation of the Russian (Crimean) Germans in 1941; post-revolutionary fate of the Amur Cossacks. The experience of analyzing the genre specificity of works connecting family chronicle, parable, fictionalized biography, memoirs is presented. Comparative analysis of the works made it possible to reveal the commonality of the organization of plot and compositional elements inherent in the genre of family chronicles. Particular attention was paid to the specificity of the author’s approach in the artistic processing of historical and biographical material (methods of aestheticization and fictionalization of documentary material, the embodiment of the author’s image, describing the fate of generations, creating the image of the “ancestor”, the use of symbolism). In the process of analysis, the idea was substantiated that the works have a pronounced value component, asserting the absolute value of the human person.
About the Author
О. N. Alexandrova-Osokina
Pacific National University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga N. Alexandrova-Osokina — Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor Departament of Literature and Journalism
Khabarovsk
References
1. Ascheulova, I. V. (2013). Family chronicle as the formation of the historical memory of generations in the novel. V. Sharov “Trace in the trace”. Bulletin of the Tomsk State Pedagogical University, 2 (130): 48—53. (In Russ).
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (2000). Author and hero: to the philosophical foundations of the humanities. Saint-Petersburg: Azbuka. 336 p. ISBN 5-267-00272-0. (In Russ).
3. Bazylev, V. N. (2020). Parable: reinterpretation of the genre. Genres of speech, 3 (27): 222— 228. (In Russ).
4. Evdokimova, O. V., Komatesova, A. S. (2017). The phenomenon of family chronicles in Russian literature of the XIX—XXI centuries: the experience of description. Philological Sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 6 (72) / 3. 16—19. (In Russ).
5. Ginzburg, L. Ya. (1976). On psychological prose. Leningrad: Khudozhestvennaya literature. 448 p. (In Russ).
6. Girshman, M. M. (1982). The rhythm of artistic prose. Moscow: Soviet writer. 366 p. (In Russ).
7. Likhachev, D. S. (1979). Poetics of Ancient Russian literature. Moscow: The Science. 360 p. (In Russ).
8. Mestergazi, E. G. (2007). About the term “documentary literature”. Bulletin of the Derzhavin TSU named after G. R. Derzhavin, 11 (55): 174—177. (In Russ).
9. Mikhailova, M. A. (2015). “Non-fictional stories” of writers of the XX century: the problem of synthesis of fiction and documentary in the memoirs of the “New World” of the era of A. Tvardovsky. Bulletin of the Vyatka State University for the Humanities, 6: 96—101. (In Russ).
10. Naumova, O.A. (2016). English-language fictionalized biography of the last decades: memoirartistic documentary and images of Siberia in the “History of Olga” S. Williams. Philology and Culture. Philology and culture, 4 (46): 237—242. (In Russ).
11. Nikolaeva, N. A. (2004). Transformation of the genre of family notes of the XVIII—XIX centuries in the “Family chronicle” of S. T. Aksakov. Materials for the Dictionary of plots and motives of Russian literature, 6. Novosibirsk. 64—82. (In Russ).
12. Nikolsky, E. V. (2020). Roman subgenre family chronicle: questions of history and theory (Article one). ART LOGOS, 3 (12): 50—65. (In Russ).
13. Samofalova, E. A. (2011). Family chronicle as a genre element of memories. Scientific notes: electronic scientific journal of Kursk State University, 4 (20): 103—107. (In Russ).
14. Samofalova, E. A. (2015). Genre signs of family chronicles in women’s memoir-autobiographical prose of the second half of the XIX century. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Moscow. 33 p. (In Russ).
15. Zeifert, E. I. (2017). Anthology of prose Russian germans second half of the XX — beginning of the XXI century in Russian and German: relevance, addressee, genre repertoire. Bulletin of the People’s Friendship University of Russia Series: Questions of education: languages and specialty, 14 (4): 710—718. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8011-2017-14-4-710-718. (In Russ).
Review
For citations:
Alexandrova-Osokina О.N. Family Chronicle Traditions in Contemporary Far Eastern Literature. Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(5):155-168. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-5-155-168
Views:
490
Email this article 