Metalanguage Attitude and Syntax of Secondary Text (Poetic Parodies by A. A. Ivanov)
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-6-151-171
Abstract
The problem of the metalanguage attitude (in the development of the concept of D. N. Uznadze) and the specifics of the implementation of the metalanguage attitude in parody as a secondary text at the syntactic level are considered. The relevance of the research lies in the fact that the development of the metalanguage aspect of speech activity in modern linguistics requires the concept of a metalanguage attitude. In addition, now it is necessary to understand how the metalanguage attitude is realized in the syntactic organization of secondary texts of a particular genre (in this case, parody). The novelty of the research lies in the creation of the general theory of the metalanguage attitude foundations, in substantiating the inclusion of the metalanguage attitude in the speech structure of parody, in the reconstruction of the elements of the parodist’s creative work on the syntax of both the original (primary) and his own (secondary) text. The poetic parodies of A. A. Ivanov were taken as material for the study, in which the metalanguage attitude, realized in the syntax, is placed at the service of the genre-stylistic conventions of parody, on the one hand, and the parodist’s aesthetic goal-setting, on the other. When analyzing poetic parodies of A. A. Ivanov, it was found that the syntactic realization of the metalanguage attitude is carried out on the basis of principles, operations and means. Four poetic parodies of A. A. Ivanov were subjected to detailed analysis.
About the Author
K. Ya. Seagal
Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kirill Ya. Seagal - Doctor of Philology chief research scientist Head of the Department of Experimental Speech Research.
Moscow
References
1. Admoni, V. G. (1965). Additional functions of analytic forms. In: Analytical constructions in languages of various types. Moscow: Leningrad: Science. 222—232. (In Russ.).
2. Bassin, F. V. (1973). To the problem of awareness of psychological attitudes. In: Psychological research dedicated to the 85th anniversary of the birth of D. N Uznadze. Tbilisi: Metsniereba. 45—51. (In Russ.).
3. Begak, B. (1930). Parody and its methods. In: Russian literary parody. Moscow: Leningrad: State Publishing House. 51—65. (In Russ.).
4. Bhat, D. N. S. (2004). Conjunction and personal pronouns. In: Coordinating construction. Amsterdam: Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 89—105.
5. Black, E. (2006). Pragmatic stylistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 166 p.
6. Chesnokova, L. D. (1980). Connections of words in modern Russian language. Moscow: Education. 110 p. (In Russ.).
7. Dentith, S. (2000). Parody. London: New York: Routledge. 211 p.
8. Galkin, L. D., Skvortsov, A. E. (2016). Genres of poetic parody and epigrams in the works of A. G. Arkhangelsky and A. A. Ivanov. Scientific notes of Kazan University. Series: Humanities, 158(1): 199—207. (In Russ.).
9. Grossman, L. (1930). Parody as a genre of literary criticism. In: Russian literary parody. Moscow: Leningrad: State Publishing House. 39—48. (In Russ.).
10. Hannosh, M. (1989). The reflexive function of parody. Comparative Literature, 41(2): 113—127.
11. Imedadze, I., Sakvarelidze, R. (2014). Uznadze: known and unknown. In: Uznadze, D. N. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy: the science of mental life. Moscow: Smysl. 10—28. (In Russ.).
12. Itkonen, E. (2005). Analogy as structure and process. Approaches in linguistics, cognitive psychology and philosophy of science. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 249 p.
13. Jacobson, R. O. (1996). Language and the unconscious. Moscow: Gnosis. 248 p. (In Russ.).
14. Lushnikova, G. I. (2010). Cognitive and linguo-stylistic features of literary parody: author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. Kemerovo. 44 p. (In Russ.).
15. Morozov, A. (1960). Parody as a literary genre (to the theory of parody). Russian literature, 1: 48—77. (In Russ.).
16. Nesterova, N. M., Popova, Yu. K. (2017). On the problem of differentiation of primary and secondary texts. Bulletin of the Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Problems of linguistics and pedagogy, 4: 52—61. (In Russ.).
17. Novikov, V. I. (2019). Literary parody. Moscow: Moscow State University. 36 p. (In Russ.).
18. Rossen-Knill, D. F., Henry, R. (1997). The pragmatics of verbal parody. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(6): 719—752.
19. Sannikov, V. Z. (1999). Russian language in the mirror of the language game. Moscow: Languages of Russian culture. 544 p. (In Russ.).
20. Sarnov, B. (1987). Burden of talent: portraits and pamphlets. Moscow: Soviet writer. 384 p. (In Russ.).
21. Sheroziya, A. E. (1979). Psyche. Consciousness. The Unconscious: Toward a Generalized Theory of Psychology. Tbilisi: Metsniereba. 171 p. (In Russ.).
22. Shumarina, M. R. (2011). Metalanguage reflection in folklore and literary text: author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. Moscow. 47 p. (In Russ.).
23. Sosnovtseva, E. G. (2017). Doubling a particle would be in conventional structures. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana: proceedings of the Institute of Linguistic Research, 13(3): 590—605. (In Russ.).
24. Tynyanov, Yu. N. (1977). Poetics. Literary history. Cinema. Moscow: Nauka. 574 p. (In Russ.).
25. Ushakova, Yu. Yu. (2005). Lexical filling and structural and semantic features of comparative tropes: author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. Moscow. 44 p. (In Russ.).
26. Uznadze, D. N. (2001). Psychology of attitude. St. Petersburg: Peter. 416 p. (In Russ.).
27. Uznadze, D. N. (2014). Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy: the science of mental life. Moscow: Smysl. 367 p. (In Russ.).
28. Verbitskaya, M. V. (2000). Theory of secondary texts (based on the material of modern English). Moscow: Moscow State University. 221 p. (In Russ.).
29. Volkov, A. V. (2009). Epigrammatic parody of A. Ivanov: the evolution of the genre in the XX century. Bulletin of the Ural State University. Series 2: Humanities, 66(4): 192—199. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Seagal K.Ya. Metalanguage Attitude and Syntax of Secondary Text (Poetic Parodies by A. A. Ivanov). Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(6):151-171. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-6-151-171
Views:
549
Email this article 