Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Phenomenon of Information Misrepresentation in Mass-Media: Versions of Facts

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-7-123-138

Abstract

The article discusses the phenomenon of factual information misrepresentation in popular print media. From the point of view of the authors, misrepresentation is determined by a general communicative pattern — the process of misrepresentation information during its transfer; the ideology of a particular edition and the tendentiousness of the media in general; striving for informational priority and a professional perspective of presenting information. Understanding the misrepresentation in the media discourse as a substitution, falsehood, fiction, and the transformation of factual information, the authors attempt to generalize the ways of translating facts (truthful information) into a version of facts. Based on the material of the “near-political narrative”, which is part of the peripheral zone of political discourse and includes texts dedicated to the politician's relatives or ancestors, as well as his personal and even intimate life, the authors distinguish three main directions that contribute to the emergence of versions of facts. These are: extra-textual factors; a group of proper text methods; change of the axiological mode of the media. It is proved that the subjective mode of modern media determines the use of not so much false information as of transformed information, the share of which is steadily increasing and begins to determine the specifics of modern journalistic text formation.

About the Authors

N. B. Ruzhentseva
Ural State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Natalia B. Ruzhentseva, Doctor of Philology, Professor

Yekaterinburg



N. N. Koshkarova
South Ural State University (national research university)
Russian Federation

Natalia N. Koshkarova, Doctor of Philology, Professor

Chelyabinsk



References

1. Abakumova, O. B. (2019). Pravda, as a value in Russian proverbs in comparison with English proverbs. In: Linguocultural values in linguistic consciousness and communicative practice. Tianjin: Tianjin University of Foreign Languages. Volgograd: PrinTerra-Design. 96—101. ISBN 978-5-98424-244-8. (In Russ).

2. Chernyak, V. D., Chernyak, M. A. (2009). Basic concepts of mass literature. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of the Herzen State Pedagogical University. 167 p. ISBN 978-5-8064-1437-4. (In Russ).

3. Galperin, I. R. (1981). Text as an object of linguistic research. Moscow: The science. 138 p. (In Russ).

4. Grishaeva, L. I. (2017). “A fairy tale is a lie, but there is a hint in it...”, or about the principles of constructing political media reality. Political Linguistics, 4 (64): 18—27. (In Russ).

5. Karasik, V. I. (2012). Subjective evaluative positioning. Linguistics of speech. Media journalism. Moscow: Flint. 152—164. ISBN 978-5-9765-1466-9, 978-5-02-037813-1. (In Russ).

6. Karasik, V. I. (2015). Linguistic manifestation of personality. Volgograd: Paradigm. 450 p. ISBN 978-5-94244-055-8. (In Russ).

7. Konkov, V. I., Potsar, A. N. (2007). Stylistic concept in the mass media. In: Russian speech in the mass media: Stylistic aspect. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University. 272 p. ISBN 978-5-288-04362-8. (In Russ).

8. Kunitsyna, V. N., Kazarinova, N. V., Pogolsha, V. M. (2001). Interpersonal communication. St. Petersburg: Peter. 544 p. ISBN 5-8046-0173-3. (In Russ).

9. Lammer-Heindel, C. Facts and Opinions. Available at: https://philosophynow.org/issues/115/Facts_and_Opinions (accessed 23/11/2020).

10. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. R., Cook, J. (2017). Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6 (4): 353—369.

11. Lorusso, A. M. (2020). Between Truth, Legitimacy, and Legality in the Post-truth Era. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 33: 1005—1017. DOI: 10.1007/s11196-020-09752-3.

12. Lovea, P., Ahiaga-Dagbuib, D. (2018). Debunking fake news in a post-truth era: The plausible untruths of cost underestimation in transport infrastructure projects. Transportation Research. Part A, 113: 357—368. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.019.

13. Muis, K. R., Etoubashi, N., Denton, C. A. (2020). The catcher in the lie: The role of emotions and epistemic judgments in changing students’ misconceptions and attitudes in a post-truth era. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X20300631 (accessed 25/11/2020).

14. Ontology of language as a social phenomenon. (1983). Moscow: The science. 312 p. (In Russ).

15. Platonova, O. V., Vinogradov, S. I. (1998). Mass media and culture of speech. In: Culture of Russian speech. Moscow: NORMA-INFRA. 238—280. ISBN 5-89123-186-7. (In Russ).

16. Popova, T. I. (2006). Genre differentiation: selection of language means in journalism. Speech aggression and speech manipulation in the media. In: Russian language and culture of speech. Moscow: Yurayt-Izdat. 129—129. (In Russ).

17. Prom, N. A. (2021). Factualization of reality in the media discourse: characteristics. types, methods of expression. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. Moscow. 40 p. (In Russ).

18. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at: https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/facts/v-1 (accessed 28.11.2020).

19. Ruzhentseva, N. B., Nakhimova, E. A., Nikiforova, M. V. (2020). Linguopolitical personology: communicative portraits. Yekaterinburg: USPU. 142 p. (In Russ).

20. Salpado, S. (2018). Online media impact on politics. Views on posttruth politics and postpostmodernism. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics. September, 14 (3): 317—331. DOI: 10.1386/macp.14.3.317_1.

21. Stepanov, V. N. (2012). On the question of emotionogenic communication. Foreign languages in higher school, 1 (20): 12—34. (In Russ).

22. Vasilyeva, A. N. (1982). Newspaper and journalistic style. Moscow: Russian Language. 198 p. (In Russ).


Review

For citations:


Ruzhentseva N.B., Koshkarova N.N. Phenomenon of Information Misrepresentation in Mass-Media: Versions of Facts. Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;1(7):123-138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-7-123-138

Views: 1505


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)