Linguo-Axiological Speech-Genre Model and Its Actualization in English Drama Discourse
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-4-131-152
Abstract
The linguo-axiological specificity of the English-language dramatic discourse is revealed through the prism of the speechgenre organization of the dialogue. The relevance of the work is due to the appeal to the problems of discursive-communicative linguoaxiology as a scientific direction, which is at the stage of formation of an independent research platform. The reasons for the linguo-axiological loading of the dramatic discourse are revealed, and the author's development of a linguo-axiological model of speech genres implemented within the limits of the British and American dramaturgical dialogue of the 20th and 21st centuries is proposed. The author dwells on five systemic parameters that form the linguo-axiological speech-genre model and substantiates the variants of their communicative manifestation. A sample of the matrix actualization of the proposed model is demonstrated on the example of a specific speech genre “small talk” when it is included in the format of a stylized dialogic interaction. The results of a comparative linguo-axiological analysis of textual realizations of the indicated speech genre are presented on the basis of four spatio-temporal fragments of the English dramatic discourse. The novelty of the study is seen in the fact that for the first time it applied the provisions of the theory of speech genres in the linguo-axiological interpretation of a stylized dialogue. It is concluded that the developed linguo-axiological model provides an opportunity to trace both the poly-aspect dynamics of the linguo-axiological indicators of the speech genre along the time axis, and its nationally marked specificity when updated within the dramaturgical dialogue.
About the Author
Yu. S. Starostina
Samara National Research University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia S. Starostina - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of English Philology.
Samara
References
1. Anisimova, T., Chubay, S., Prigarina, N. (2018). Principles of Describing a Private Rhetoric Genres System. In: SHS Web Conf.: The International Scientific and Practical Con-ference “Current Issues of Linguistics and Didactics: The Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences” (CILDIAH-2018), 50: 1—5. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20185001041.
2. Boromisza-Habashi, D., Reinig, L. (2018). Speech genres and cultural value in the Anglo-American public speaking course as a site of language socialization. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 2 (11): 117—135. DOI: 10.1080/17513057.2018.1428765.
3. Chekulai, I. V., Prokhorova, O. N. (2021). Aspects of the correlation of the dichotomy “language” and “speech”, “value” and “evaluation”. Language studies and modern hu-manitarian knowledge, 3 (2): 167—173. DOI: 10.33910/2686-830X-2021-3-2-167-173. (In Russ.).
4. Cherkass, I. A. (2019). Typology of speech genres: flirting as an indirect speech genre. Hu-manities and social sciences, 6: 241—251. DOI: 10.23683/2070-1403-2019-77-6-241-251. (In Russ.).
5. Dementyev, V. V. (2010). Theory of speech genres. Moscow: Znak. 600 p. ISBN 978-5-9551-0409-6. (In Russ.).
6. Dementyev, V. V. (2019). Chains of speech genre system: lexicalization and grammaticali-zation of links. Proceedings of the Vinogradov Institute of the Russian Language, 20: 36—48. DOI: 10.31912/pvrli-2019.20.4. (In Russ.).
7. Foad, C., Hanel, P., Maio, G. R. Perception of values over time and why they matter. Journal of Personality. Nov. 1—17. DOI: 10.111/jopy.12608.
8. Gabunia, Z., Kremshokalova, M. (2014). Genre speech as a unit of modern linguistics. Cuadernos de rusística Española, 10: 15—24. DOI: 10.30827/cre.v10i0.2593.
9. Ivanova, M. A., Novichkova, O. V. (2018). The Impact of Cultural Differences on Small Talk Style. In: Communicative challenges of the XXI century. Saratov: IC “Science”. 102—106.
10. Karasik, V. I. (2020). Utterance, genre, discourse: semiotic modeling. Genres of speech, 2 (26): 90—99. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2020-2-26-90-99. (In Russ.).
11. Kosova, K. I. (2014). Small talk as a universal phatic genre in the global communicative space. Proceedings of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 2 (87): 34—38. (In Russ.).
12. Maslova, V. A. (2021). Theory of speech genres through the prism of modern linguistics. Genres of speech, 1 (29): 6—11. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2021-1-29-6-11. (In Russ.).
13. Narang, T. K. (2015). To Each Their Own. Available at: https://proplay.ws/to-each-their-own (accessed 21.11.2021).
14. Pikalina, A. S. (2021). Tactical organization of a quarrel as a speech genre. Humanitarian scientific Bulletin, 4: 108—113. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4769148. (In Russ.).
15. Pitt, P. (2016). A Love Never Forgotten. Available at: https://artsdocbox.com/Humor/103448699-Alove-never-forgotten-one-act-play-peter-pitt.html (accessed 24.11.2021).
16. Priestley, J. B. (1973). The plays. London: Heinemann. ISBN 0434603406 9780434603404.
17. Rabenko, T. G. (2017). Speech Genre in Linguistic Variantology (on Material of Speech Genre “Personal Letter”). Nauchnyi dialog, 12: 189—199. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2017-12-189-199. (In Russ.).
18. Sakharova, O. V. (2015). Genres and roles (on the issue of genre organization of dramatic discourse). Genres of speech, 2 (12): 112—118. (In Russ.).
19. Sedov, K. F. (2007). Man in the genre space of everyday communication. In: Anthology of speech genres: everyday communication. Moscow: Labyrinth. 7—38. ISBN 5-87604-190-4. (In Russ.).
20. Slyshkin, G. G. (2017). The phenomenon of value in philosophy and linguoculturology. In: Values in linguocultural aspect: linguistic consciousness, communication, text: proceedings of the International scientific Conference, Tianjin, November 25, 2017 / Tianjin University of Foreign Languages. Tianjin: [b. i.]. 3—9. (In Russ.).
21. Smolina, A. N. (2021). Model for Describing of Speech Genre “Spiritual Essay”: Basic Parameters and Implementation (Theolinguistic Aspect). Nauchnyi dialog, 10: 134—152. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-10-134-152. (In Russ.).
22. Starostina, Y. S. (2020). Linguoaxiological parameters of the British dramaturgical discourse (based on the material of the play by J. Priestley “Dangerous Turn"). Bulletin of Pyatigorsk State University, 4: 25—30. (In Russ.).
23. Tyukaeva, N. I., Brinev, K. I. (2021). System Modeling of Author’s Image in Texts of One Speech Genre. Nauchnyi dialog, 10: 153—174. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-10-153-174. (In Russ.).
24. Vinel, E., Salazar-Orvig, A., De Weck, G. (2021). The impact of speech genres on the use of referring expressions. In: The Acquisition of Referring Expressions: A dialogical approach. Paris: John Benjamins Publishing Houses. 288—316. DOI: 10.1075/tilar.28.
25. Zubkova, Ya. V., Zheltukhina, M. R. (2021). The structure of communicative reality. Baltic Humanitarian Journal, 10 / 1 (34): 352—354. DOI: 10.26140/bgz3-2021-1001-0083. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Starostina Yu.S. Linguo-Axiological Speech-Genre Model and Its Actualization in English Drama Discourse. Nauchnyi dialog. 2022;11(4):131-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-4-131-152
Views:
337
Email this article 