Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Linguistic and Cultural Aspect of Interpretation of Aphoristic Expressions with Zoocomponents ‘Dog’ and ‘Horse’ (Khanty and Khakass Languages)

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-7-44-58

Abstract

The article is devoted to one of the aspects of the linguistic substantiation of the connection between language and culture: the identification of lexical units with a potential conceptual meaning in thematic groups, which allows them to participate in the creation of aphoristic idioms (aphorisms, proverbs, sayings). From the standpoint of linguistic typology in the lexico-semantic sphere, the words denoting a dog and a horse in the Khanty and Khakass languages are considered. The empirical base of the study was the author’s notes of the spoken language of the Khanty, dictionaries of the Khanty and Khakass languages, a collection of Khanty riddles, a collection of Khakass proverbs and sayings. As a result of the study, a circle of idioms (indicated languages) with a distinct cognitive and mental, worldview basis is outlined. The methods used are the method of typological interpretation of lexical material and descriptive. When analyzing the semantics of these words, special attention was paid to the indication of regular stable phrases: it is the associative potencies that are the basis for the development of further connotations, the logical conclusion of which is the participation of certain words in idioms. It has been established that idiomatic constructions with the lexemes ‘dog’ and ‘horse’ characterize not so much these animals as the way of life of two different ethnic groups, as well as the human qualities of the representatives of these peoples, shed light on their ideas about life.

About the Author

A. D. Kaksin
Katanov Khakas State University
Russian Federation

Andrey D. Kaksin, Doctor of Philology, Institute for Humanitarian Research and Sayan-Altai Turkology

Abakan



References

1. Chesnokov, P. V. (1977). Neogumboldtianism. In: Philosophical foundations of foreign trends in linguistics. Moscow: Nauka. 7—62. (In Russ.).

2. Cheremisina, M. I. (1992). Languages of the indigenous peoples of Siberia: A textbook. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University. 92 p. ISBN 5-94356-391-1. (In Russ.).

3. Cheremisina, M. I. (1998). Language as a phenomenon of reality and an object of linguistics. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University. 128 p. (In Russ.).

4. Cheremisina, M. I. (2002). Language and its reflection in the science of language. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State University. 254 p. (In Russ.).

5. Chertykova, M. D. (2019). Proverbial conceptualization of the common Turkic zoolexeme at “horse” (based on the material of the Khakass language). Languages and folklore of the indigenous peoples of Siberia, 2 (38): 78—84. DOI: 10.25205/2312-6337-2019-2-78-84. (In Russ.).

6. Chertykova, M. D. (2021). The image of a hardworking / lazy person in the Khakass proverbial picture of the world. Tomsk Journal of Linguistic and Anthropological Research, 2 (32): 79—92. DOI: 10.23951/2307-6119-2021-2-79-92. (In Russ.).

7. Fundamentals of Finno-Ugric linguistics. Questions of origin and development of Finno-Ugric languages. (1974). Moscow: Nauka. 484 p. (In Russ.).

8. Leontieva, T. V. (2017). The idiom to eat a dog: semantic and motivational reconstruction. Bulletin of Tomsk State University, 422: 17—25. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/422/3. (In Russ.).

9. Kornilov, O. A. (2003). Linguistic pictures of the world as derivatives of national mentalities. Moscow: Chero. 349 p. ISBN 5-88711-181-X. (In Russ.).

10. Koshkareva, N. B. (2020). Color designations in the Uralic languages of Siberia: color or light, adjectives or verbs? Criticism and semiotics, 2: 152—166. DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2020-2-152-166. (In Russ.).

11. Krongauz, M. A. (2001). Semantics: Textbook for universities. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities. 399 p. ISBN 5-7281-0344-8. (In Russ.).

12. Paducheva, E. V. (2000). Semantics of guilt and shifting accents in the interpretation of the lexeme. In: Logical analysis of language: Languages of ethics. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture. 149—166. ISBN 5-7859-0156-0. (In Russ.).

13. Plungyan, V. A. (2000). General morphology: An Introduction to problems. Moscow: Editorial URSS. 384 p. ISBN 5-8360-0142-1. (In Russ.).

14. Söder, T. (2001). “Walk This Way”: Verbs of Motion in Three Finno-Ugric Languages. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. 154 pp.

15. Telia, V. N. (1990). Connotation. In: Linguistic encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia. P. 236. ISBN 5-85270-031-2. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Kaksin A.D. Linguistic and Cultural Aspect of Interpretation of Aphoristic Expressions with Zoocomponents ‘Dog’ and ‘Horse’ (Khanty and Khakass Languages). Nauchnyi dialog. 2022;11(7):44-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-7-44-58

Views: 330


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)