“Almost Soviet Father”: An Experience of Microhistorical Research of Rural Confessional History in 1940s—1970s
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-8-313-331
Abstract
The problem of the possibility of a fruitful study of the rural parish history of the Soviet period through microhistorical analysis is raised. For discussion, the experience of researching the fate of a small Old Believer community is proposed. Both archival documents and interview materials are used. The purpose of the publication is to show some factors of the reproduction of traditional religious culture on the Soviet collective farm of the 1940s—1970s and at the same time demonstrate the heuristic potential of combined archival and field work. The author focuses on the figure of a priest who managed to restore and strengthen his parish, despite the previous dispossession and destruction of the prayer house. The cohesion of the community, outstanding personal qualities, as well as the ability of believers to practically harmonize Christian and Soviet values became the conditions for his success is shown in the article. The adoption of Soviet cultural norms, excluding atheism, is considered in the work as the most important factor in the survival of the Old Believer community. The expediency of verifying the data of official Soviet documentation by referring to oral history is demonstrated in the study. It is pointed out that in the materials of the USSR civil servants devoted to confessional phenomena, strict facts could be combined with false interpretations.
Keywords
About the Author
A. V. ApanasenokRussian Federation
Alexander V. Apanasenok - Doctor of History, Professor.
Kursk, Moscow
References
1. Apanasenok, A. V., Bubnov, A. Y. (2021). Orthodox practices in the structure of everyday life of citizens of the USSR of the 1940s — 1950s. Questions of History, 12 (3): 204—214. DOI: 10.31166/VoprosyIstorii202112Statyi93. (In Russ.).
2. Bubnov, A. Y. (2021). Political religion and the phenomenon of “Soviet believers”. In: Russia and political order in a changing world: values, institutions, prospects. Proceedings of the IX All-Russian Congress of Political Scientists, Moscow, December 16—18, 2021. Moscow: Aspect-Press. 93—94. ISBN 978-5-7567-1170-7. (In Russ.).
3. Cherepanova, R. S. (2011). Soviet experience in the post-Soviet space of memory. Monitoring of public opinion, 6 (106): 66—75. (In Russ.).
4. Kail, M. V. (2021). Orthodoxy in Russia 1914—1964: the experience of studying and public memory in the discourse of repression and the search for alternative cognitive approaches. New Historical Bulletin, 3 (69): 74—86. DOI: 10.54770/20729286-2021-3-74. (In Russ.).
5. Lizgunov, P. O. (2021). Publications of svt. Luke (Voino-Yasenetsky) and the problem of the identity of believers of Soviet citizens. Theological Bulletin, 4 (43): 159—189. DOI: 10.31802/GB.2021.43.4.010. (In Russ.).
6. Luke (Archbishop of Crimea and Simferopol). (1948). The State has called us to peace. Jour-nal of the Moscow Patriarchate, 1: 61—64. (In Russ.).
7. Luke, Archbishop (Voino-Yasenetsky). (2001). Science and Religion: Spirit, Soul and Body. Moscow: Troitskoe slovo. 315 p. ISBN 5-222-01795-8. (In Russ.).
8. Lurie, S. V. (1999). Nationalism, ethnicity, culture: categories of science and historical practice. Social sciences and modernity, 4: 101—111. (In Russ.).
9. Lurmann, S. (2012). What can we know about Soviet religiosity? (Comparison of archival and oral sources from the post-war Volga region). State, religion, Church in Russia and abroad, 3—4 (30): 485—504. (In Russ.).
10. Mitrokhin, N. (2012). A disease called “The Commissioner’s Fund” or several pages about the actual problems of studying religiosity in the USSR. State, religion, Church in Russia and abroad, 3—4 (30): 505—511. (In Russ.).
11. Shlikhta, N. V. (2012). “Orthodox” and “Soviet”: on the question of the identity of believers of Soviet citizens (1940s — early 1970s). Anthropological forum, 23: 82—107. (In Russ.).
12. Siegelbaum, L. H. (1992). Religion, Anti-Religion and Double Faith. In: Soviet State and So-ciety between Revolutions, 1918—1929. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 156—165.
13. Stone, A. B. (2008). “Overcoming Peasant Backwardness”: The Khrushchev Antireligious Campaign and the Rural Soviet Union. Russian Review, 67 (2): 296—320.
14. Vorobyova, N. V. (2019). Constructing the “Soviet” identity in the autobiographies of Omsk bishops. In: Omsk Scientific Readings — 2019. Materials of the Third All-Russian Sci-entific Conference. Omsk: Omsk State University named after F. M. Dostoevsky. 962—963. ISBN 978-5-7779-2435-3. (In Russ.).
15. Young, G. (1997). Power and the Sacred in Revolutionary Russia: Religious Activists in the Village. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. 307 p.
Review
For citations:
Apanasenok A.V. “Almost Soviet Father”: An Experience of Microhistorical Research of Rural Confessional History in 1940s—1970s. Nauchnyi dialog. 2022;11(8):313-331. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-8-313-331