Epistolary Mechanism and Unreliable Narrator in Novel by V. V. Nabokov “Once in Aleppo…”
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-9-179-195
Abstract
The cases of V. V. Nabokov’s appeal to the epistolary mechanism are considered. It turns out that the epistolary genre, as well as V. V. Nabokov’s metanarrative reflection create a dual context around the narrator, who mixes with the character. In particular, the prospect of interpreting the epistolary text is assessed, taking into account the concept of an unreliable narrator on the example of V. V. Nabokov’s 1943 short story. It is suggested that a participant in literary correspondence can be classified as an unreliable narrator, especially if his narration fluctuates between an inadequate assessment of reality and illusion. It is noted that imaginary events, which are evidence of madness, speak of the stress that the narrator invented by V. V. Nabokov is experiencing during the Second World War and the moment of flight from France from the Nazi Wehrmacht. It is emphasized that the demonstrative narrative complexity makes the aesthetic experience richer and more diverse when reading an already structurally complex postmodern text. It is pointed out that the epistolary examples from the corpus of V. V. Nabokov’s prose are placed in the general context of the development of the literary letters genre in the first half of the 20th century.
About the Author
G. A. Krichevsky
Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Grigory A. Krichevsky, Professor School of Communications
WoS ResearcherID S-2931-2018
Moscow
References
1. Altman, J. G. (1982). Epistolarity. In: Approaches to a Form. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press. 252 р.
2. Averin, B. V. (1999). The genius of total recollection. About Nabokov’s prose. In: Vladimir Nabokov. To the 100th anniversary of his birth, 4. St. Petersburg: Zvezda. 158—163. (In Russ.).
3. Barabtarlo, G. (1995). “English Short Stories,” in The Garland Companion to Vladimir Nabokov. New York: Garland. 106—107.
4. Barton Johnson, D. (1985). Worlds in Regression: Some Novels of Vladimir Nabokov. Ann Arbor: Ardis. 233 р.
5. Blo, Zh. (2000). Nabokov. St. Petersburg: Nabokov Foundation, Russian-Baltic Information Center “Blitz”. 240 p. ISBN 5-86789-122-4. (In Russ.).
6. Booth, W. C. (1983). The Rhetoric of Fiction. Second Edition. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 552 p.
7. Dictionary of terms of French structuralism. (1975). In: Structuralism: “For” and “Against”. Collection of articles. Moscow: “Progress”. P. 452. (In Russ.).
8. Dolinin, A. A. (2004). The True Life of the writer Sirin: Works on Nabokov. Saint Petersburg: Academic Project. 400 p. ISBN 5-7331-0283-7. (In Russ.).
9. Esposito, K. (2022). Modern nihilism. In: Chronicle. Moscow: RIPOLL Classic. 240 p. ISBN 978-5-386-14847-8. (In Russ.).
10. Ginzburg, L. Ya. (1976). About psychological prose. Leningrad: “Fiction”. 448 p. (In Russ.).
11. Gordienko, A. M. Features of V. V. Nabokov’s epistolary stories. In: Materials of the XVI International Conference of students, postgraduates and young scientists “Lomonosov—2009”. Sections “Philology”. Subsection “Russian literature of the XX — XXI centuries”. Available at: https://confer.mephi.ru/archive/Lomonosov_2009/xxcentury/gordienko.pdf (accessed 11.08.2022). (In Russ.).
12. Johnson, R. (2001). Nabokov tutorials, 50 studies of The Collected Stories. Available at: http://www.mantex.co.uk/ou/a319/nab-000.htm (accessed 21.05.2022).
13. Kuznetsov, P. V. (1992). Utopia of loneliness. Vladimir Nabokov and metaphysics. Novy Mir, 10: 243—250. (In Russ.).
14. Ledenev, A. V. (2005). V. V. Nabokov’s poetics and stylistics in the context of artistic searches of the late XIX — first half of the XX century. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. Moscow. 42 p. (In Russ.).
15. Lipovetsky, M. (1997). Epilogue of Russian modernism. The artistic philosophy of creativity in the “Gift»»«» Nabokova. In: V. V. Nabokov: Pro et contra. The personality and creativity of Vladimir Nabokov in the assessment of Russian and foreign thinkers and researchers. Anthology. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute. 638—661. (In Russ.).
16. Maddox, L. (1983). Nabokov’s Novels in English. Amsterdam: University of Georgia Press. 6—7.
17. Murphey, T. (2012). Defining the reliable narrator: The marked status of first-person fiction. Journal of Literary Semantics. January, 41. DOI: 10.1515/jls-2012-0004.
18. Quinn, B. (2002). “Virtual Reality in Nabokov’s” “That in Aleppo Once...”. Kyushu University Institutional Repository. Language and Cultural Research. February, 15: 79—89. DOI: 10.15017/5430.
19. Riggan, W. (1982). Pícaros, Madmen, Naīfs, and Clowns: The Unreliable First-person Narra-tor. Oklahoma: Univ. of Oklahoma Press: Norman. 206 p. ISBN 978-0806117140.
20. Schuman, S. (2014). Nabokov’s Shakespeare. New York: Bloomsbury. 204 p. ISBN 9781628924268.
21. Shakespeare, W. (2018). Othello. In: Othello. Macbeth. Tragedies. William Shakespeare. Mos-cow: Vremya. 304 p. ISBN 978-5-00112-024-7. (In Russ.).
22. Strandberg, V. (2000). Nabokov and “The Prism of Art”. Torpid Smoke: The Stories of Vladimir Nabokov. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Rodopi. 189—202.
23. Todorov, Ts. (1999). Introduction to Fantastic Literature. Moscow: House of Intellectual Books. 144 p. ISBN 5-7333-0435-9. (In Russ.).
24. Yerofeyev, V. V. (1988). Russian metaroman V. Nabokov, or In search of a lost paradise. Questions of literature, 10: 125—160. (In Russ.).
25. Zhakkar, Zh.-F. Literature for show: from modernism to the classics. In: Literature as such. From Nabokov to Pushkin: Selected Works on Russian Literature. Moscow: New Lit-erary Review. 11—36. ISBN 978-5-86793-925-0. (In Russ.).
26. Zhakkar, J.-F. (2011). Letters in the snow, or the meeting of two signified in the deep forest (“Despair” V. Nabokov). In: Literature as such. From Nabokov to Pushkin: Selected Works on Russian Literature. Moscow: New Literary Review. 58—88. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Krichevsky G.A. Epistolary Mechanism and Unreliable Narrator in Novel by V. V. Nabokov “Once in Aleppo…”. Nauchnyi dialog. 2022;11(9):179-195. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-9-179-195
Views:
590
Email this article 