Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Lexical Portrait of an Oral Story: a Corpus Study of Speech of Two Generations of Native Speakers of Russian

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-10-121-138

Abstract

The article is devoted to the quantitative and statistical analysis of the vocabulary of the oral stories corpus based on pictures. The subjects were 42 people, monolingual native speakers of the Russian (representatives of 15 families). The purpose of the study is to identify and describe the lexical parameters that distinguish the oral stories of representatives of different generations. An attempt is made to consider the connection of these parameters with the formation of native speakers’ ideas about the lexical structure of the narrative. The following results are obtained. The nature of the stimulus material ensured an approximately equal degree of complexity in the texts of both groups, although the volume of the parents’ active vocabulary significantly exceeded the volume of the children’s vocabulary. At the level of individual texts, both groups use equally diverse vocabulary per unit of text volume. In the children’s stories, the main “plot” vocabulary is quite heterogeneous, while the parents tend to lexical unification of the narrative. In the texts of both groups, local reference and direction of movement are expressed in the same way, which indicates their “basic” narrative function, which does not depend on the age of the subjects. The stories of the parents are also unified in terms of vocabulary, showing the logical structure of the narrative and different types of semantic relations in the text.

About the Author

M. S. Shishkov
Shanghai International Studies University; St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Maxim S. Shishkov – PhD in Philology, Associate Professor

 ResearcherID: I-4253-2013

Shanghai (China); St. Petersburg



References

1. Baker, J. Ch. (1988). Pace: A Test of Authorship Based on the Rate at which New Words Enter an Author's Text. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 3 (1): 36—39.

2. Bogdanova-Beglaryan, N V. (2017). Oral spontaneous speech: the fate of some grammatical units. Corpus Linguistics. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Publishing House. 134—139. (In Russ.).

3. Bogdanova-Beglaryan, N. V. (2016). Functioning of some pragmatems of Russian oral speech in the communication of representatives of different social groups. Bulletin of the Perm University. Russian and foreign philology, 2 (34): 38—49. DOI: 10.17072/2037-6681-2016-2-38-49. (In Russ.).

4. Bogdanova-Beglaryan, N. V., Blinova. O. V., Martynenko, G. Ya., Sherstinova, T. Yu. (2019). Proceedings of the Russian Language Institute them. V.V. Vinogradov, 21: 100—110. (In Russ.).

5. Fedorova, O. V. (2016). Psycholinguistic studies of discourse in field linguistics. Socio- and psycholinguistic studies, 4: 7—18. (In Russ.).

6. Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology. 32 (3): 221—233. DOI: 10.1037/h0057532

7. Hoel, T. (2016). Narratives of Little Readers: The Reader Model and Real Readers. Modern Preschool Education: Theory and Practice, 10 (72): 66—80. (In Russ.).

8. Kibrik, A. A., Podlesskaya, V. I. (eds.). (2009) Dream Stories: A Corpus Study of Oral Russian Discourse. Moscow: Languages of Slavic cultures. 736 p. ISBN 978-5-9551-0303-7. (In Russ.).

9. Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P. Jr., Rogers, R. L., Chissom, B. S. (eds.). (1975). Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count And Flesch Reading Ease Formula) For Navy Enlisted Personnel. (Institute for Simulation and Training. 56.) ii, 39 p. Available at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/istlibrary/56 (accessed 23.10.2022).

10. Lyashevskaya, O. N. Readability indices as a measure of text complexity assessment: [Report at the seminar of the NUG]. Available at: https://ling.hse.ru/data/2016/12/15/1111563794/Readability%20talk.pdf (accessed 23.10.2022). (In Russ.).

11. McLaughlin, H. (1969). SMOG grading — a new readability formula. Journal of Reading. 12 (8): 639—646.

12. Reilly, J., Losh, M., Bellugi, U., Wulfeck, B. (2004). “Frog, where are you?” Narratives in children with specific language impairment, early focal brain injury, and Williams syndrome. Brain and Language, 88 (2): 229—247.DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00101-9.

13. Rybanov, A. A. (2011). Evaluation of the quality of texts of electronic teaching aids. School technologies, 6: 172—174. (In Russ.).

14. Sevastyanova, A. M. (2021). The functioning of the verbs of motion in the speech of Russian-speaking children of preschool age (on the basis of stories from pictures). St. Petersburg: VVM Publishing House. 165—171. (In Russ.).

15. Sobolev, A. A., Fedotova, A. M., Kurtukova, A. V., Romanov, A. S., Shelupanov, A. A. (2022). Methodology for determining the age of a text author based on readability and lexical diversity metrics. Reports of the Tomsk State University of Control Systems and radio electronics, 25 (2): 45—52. DOI: 10.21293/1818-0442-2022-25-2-45-52. (In Russ.).

16. Varfolomeev, A. P. (ed.). (2000). Psychosemantics of the word and linguostatistics of the text: Guidelines for the special course. Kaliningrad: Kaliningrad State University. 37 p. (In Russ.).

17. Verkhozin, S. S. (2013). On the status of quantitative methods in linguistics. Bulletin of the Irkutsk State Linguistic University, 3 (24): 145—150. (In Russ.).

18. Zakharova, E. Yu., Savina, O. Yu. (2020). Lexical diversity of the text and methods of its measurement. Bulletin of the Tyumen State University. Humanitarian research. humanitates, 6 (1-21): 20—34. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2020-6-1-20-34. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Shishkov M.S. Lexical Portrait of an Oral Story: a Corpus Study of Speech of Two Generations of Native Speakers of Russian. Nauchnyi dialog. 2022;11(10):121-138. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-10-121-138

Views: 320


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)