Career Trajectories of Political Leaders and Formation of Political Elite in USSR in 1966—1990 (Politburo of CPSU Central Committee)

The analysis of the members of the CPSU Politburo of the Central Committee biographical characteristics as an elite category in the structure of the Soviet political class is carried out. The purpose of the study is to identify normative patterns in the career trajectories of the highest stratum of the Soviet political elite. To achieve this goal, a database was formed containing the biographical characteristics of the leaders who had the status of a member and candidate member of the Politburo in the period from 1966 to 1990. Some parameters of the biographies of the studied leaders are of a normative nature, that is, they are characteristic of the majority: gender belonging to the male sex, place of birth in a rural area, higher education with a specific technical specialty, early age of starting managerial activity and relatively late age of entering the Politburo level as the highest stratum of the Soviet political class, experience in the real sector of the economy and management, combined with experience in exercising deputy powers in representative bodies at various levels. The combination of these characteristics contributed to the positive perception of the political elite by society and can be considered as a model for comparison with the political elite of modern Russia.

1. Chernev, A. D. (1996). 229 Kremlin leaders. Moscow: Russika. 333 p. ISBN 5-7330-0066-X. (In Russ.).

2. Fokin, A. A. (2017). Soviet elections in the 1960s. as a mechanism of interaction between the government and the society. Voprosy istorii, 6: 138—145. (In Russ.).

3. Gaman-Golutvina, O. V. (2006). Political elites of Russia: milestones of historical evolution. Moscow: ROSSPEN. 448 p. ISBN 5-8243-0805-5. (In Russ.).

4. Kharichev, A. D., Shutov, A. Yu., Polosin, A. V., Sokolova, E. N. (2022). Perception of basic values, factors and structures of the socio-historical development of Russia (based on research and approbation). Journal of Political Studies, 6 (3): 9—19. (In Russ.).

5. Khlevnyuk, O. V, Gorlitsky, Y, Kosheleva Y. P. et al. (eds.) (2002). Politburo of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks and the Council of Ministers of the USSR. 1945—1953 . Moscow: ROSSPEN. 656 p. ISBN 5-8243-0292-8. (In Russ.).

6. Khlevnyuk, O. V. (1996). Politburo. Mechanisms of political power in the 1930s. Moscow: ROSSPEN. 296 p. ISBN 5-86004-050-4. (In Russ.).

7. Khlevnyuk, O. V. (2012). The fatal reform of N. S. Khrushchev: the division of the party apparatus and its consequences. 1962—1964. Russian history, 4: 164—179. (In Russ.).

8. Kryshtanovskaya, O. V. (2004). Modern concepts of the political elite and Russian practice. World of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology, 13 (4): 3—39. (In Russ.).

9. Kuznetsov, I. I. (2011). Institutional approach to the study of political leadership in Russia. Bulletin of the Saratov University. Series “Sociology. Political science”, 11 (2): 62—69. (In Russ.).

10. Leites, N. (2009). Politburo through the eyes of the West. Political Linguistics, 4 (30): 164—176. (In Russ.).

11. Maudsley, E., White, S. (2011). The Soviet elite from Lenin to Gorbachev: The Central Committee and its members, 1917—1991. Moscow: B. N. Yeltsin Presidential Center Foundation. ISBN 978-5-8243-1604-9. (In Russ.).

12. Mezhuev, B. V. (2015). Russian elites: self-isolation strategies. A quarter of a century after the USSR: people, society, reforms. Moscow: Moscow University Press. 405—435. ISBN 978-5-19-011078-4. (In Russ.).

13. Pikhoya, R. G. (2009). Moscow. Kremlin. power. 1945—2005. Volume 2. 1964—1985. Moscow: New Chronograph. 220 p. ISBN 978-5-94881-092-8. (In Russ.).

14. Pikhoya, R. G. (2016). Power. Nomenclature. Own. On one of the reasons for the collapse of the USSR. In: Ananchenko, A. B. (ed.). The historical place of the Soviet society. Moscow: Moscow State Pedagogical University. 7—22. (In Russ.).

15. Pikhoya, R. G.(2009). Moscow. Kremlin. power. 1945-2005. Volume 3. 1985-2005. Moscow: New Chronograph. 495 p. ISBN 978-5-94881-093-5. (In Russ.).

16. Pyzhikov, A. V. (1999). Political transformations in the USSR (50-60s). Moscow: Square C: Fantera. 305 p. ISBN 5-85124-132-2. (In Russ.).

17. Shestopal, E. B. (2011). Political leadership and personality problems. Polis, 2: 53—68. (In Russ.).

18. Shestopal, E. B. (ed.). (2019). Power and leaders in the perception of Russian citizens. A quarter of a century of observations (1993—2018). Moscow: The whole world. 656 p. ISBN 978-5-7777-0746-8. (In Russ.).

19. Shestopal, E. B., Selezneva, A. V. (ed.) (2015). Modern elite of Russia: political and psychological analysis. Moscow: ARGAMAK-MEDIA. 448 p. ISBN 978-5-00024-046-5. (In Russ.).

20. Speransky, A. V. (2018). Bureaucracy and the Soviet Model of Management: Contradictions of Compromise. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Social and Humanitarian Sciences, 18 (3): 64—68. (In Russ.).

21. Speransky, A. V. Soviet model of management: theoretical discussions and political practice. History and modern outlook, 1 (4): 46—53. (In Russ.).

22. Sushkov, A. V. (2009). Presidium of the Central Committee of the CPSU in 1957—1964: personalities and power. Yekaterinburg: Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 386 p. ISBN 978-5-7691-2061-9. (In Russ.).

23. Voslensky, M. (2005). Nomenclature. Moscow: Zakharov. 640 p. ISBN 978-5-8159-1368-4. (In Russ.).

24. Weber, M. (1990). Politics as a vocation and profession. In: Weber, M. Selected works. Moscow: Progress. 643—706. ISBN 5-01-001584-6. (In Russ.).

25. Zelenov, M. V., Pivovarov, N. Yu. (2020) Apparatus of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks: structure, functions, personnel. July 10, 1948 — October 5, 1952: Reference book. Moscow, St. Petersburg: Nestor-History. 776 p. ISBN 978-5-4469-1398-5. (In Russ.).