Stereotypic Formulas of Business Documents and Monuments of Common Language of Moscow Rus’ in 16th and 17th Centuries (Systematizing Approach)
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-2-9-26
Abstract
The relevance of the article is determined by the insufficient study of stable verbal complexes in the language of the XVI—XVII centuries — the initial stage of the formation of the Russian national language. The novelty of the study can be seen in the systematization of a separate category of data stable units — formulas that function in texts of this period that differ in genre. The term stereotypic formulas is introduced, and its definition is offered. The purpose of the article is a comprehensive description of the material for further presentation in the historical differentiated phraseological dictionary. The classification of the analyzed stereotypical formulas is given according to various criteria: the degree of prevalence in business and everyday language texts of the period under study, in accordance with the form of the document, from the point of view of structure. Particular attention is paid to the linguistic and sociocultural aspect of the analyzed units consideration: the identification of their linguistic and cultural potential, historical and social conditioning in the considered period, the ability to act as a symbol, the need for decoding for modern speakers of the language. It is concluded that stereotyped formulas represent a systematic dictionary association of units of different degrees of stability and different structure. Problems that require solutions in the lexicographic description of stereotyped formulas are defined.
Keywords
business documents,
stereotyped formulas,
stable verbal complexes,
differentiated historical phraseological dictionary
Supporting agencies: The study is supported by Russian Science Foundation, project number № 23-28-00038 “The origins of Russian phraseology: a project of a differentiated historical dictionary of phraseological units of the Russian language of the XVI—XVII centuries”
About the Author
E. I. Zinovyeva
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena I. Zinovieva, Doctor of Philology, Professor, Department of the Russian Language as a Foreign Language and Methods of its Teaching
ResearcherID: N-2301-2015
Scopus Author ID: 57194241024
St. Petersburg
References
1. Generalova, E. V. (2014a). Reflection of elements of Russian culture in historical dictionaries through stable combinations of the XVI—XVII centuries. models “adjective + noun”. Problems of history, philology, culture, 3: 131—133. (In Russ.).
2. Generalova, E. V. (2014b). Compound names in the history of the language. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series 9. Philology. Oriental studies. Journalism, 3: 110—121. (In Russ.).
3. Generalova, E. V. (2019). Linguistic portrait of Moscow red tape. Slavic historical lexicology and lexicography, 2: 7—16. (In Russ.).
4. Kandaurova, T. N. (1970). On the question of traditional phrases-stamps in ancient Russian monuments of the XI—XIV centuries. Scientific notes of the Moscow Pedagogical Institute. Institute, 353: 114—157. (In Russ.).
5. Lapteva, O. A. (1959). Arrangement of components of a stable phrase as an element of its structure. Questions of linguistics, 3: 73—85. (In Russ.).
6. Lyubimova, L. M. (2000). Stable formulas of Nerchinsk business monuments of the late XVII — early XVIII centuries. In: Language of education and language education. Materials of the international scientifi conference. Veliky Novgorod: [b. i.]. 192—193. (In Russ.).
7. Mzhelskaya, O. S. (2003). Vocabulary of the everyday spoken language of Moscow Rus of the XVI—XVII centuries. (according to foreign manuals for learning Russian). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press. 220 p. ISBN 5-288-03319-6. (In Russ.).
8. Pimenova, M. V. (2015). Historical dictionary of stable units: problems and prospects. In: Modern problems of lexicography: Conference Materials. St. Petersburg: NestorIstoriya. 144—145. ISBN 978-5-9765-1058-6. (In Russ.).
9. Pimenova, M. V. (2020). Lexicographic description of Old Russian stable combinations of words (based on the material of verbal turns). Questions of lexicography, 17: 178—194. DOI: 10.17223/22274200/17/9. (In Russ.).
10. Roizenzon, L. I. (1973). Lectures on general and Russian phraseology. Samarkand: [b. i.].
11. a. 221 p. (In Russ.).
12. Roizenzon, L. I. (1961). Phraseologization as a linguistic phenomenon. In: Proceedings of A. Navoi Samara State University, 113. Samarkand: New Series. 101—117. (In Russ.).
13. Tokarev, G. V., Leonova, Yu. Yu. (2011). Lexico-phraseological means of expressing requests in petitioners of the XVII century. Bulletin of Volgograd State University, 2 (14): 50—54. (In Russ.)
14. Tvorogov, O. V. (1964). Tasks of studying stable literary formulas of Ancient Russia. In: Proceedings of the Department of Ancient Russian Literature. Actual tasks of studying Russian literature of the XI—XVII centuries, 20. Moscow-Leningrad: DB. 29—40. (In Russ.).
15. Varnikova, E. N. (2020). Semantic and word—formation features of horse nicknames in the history of the Russian language (according to the census books of Vologda monasteries of the XVI — early XVIII century). Questions of onomastics, 17 (1): 47—83. DOI: 10.15826/vopr_onom.2020.17.1.003. (In Russ.).
16. Veretennikov, V. I. (1916). On the question of methods of studying ancient Russian private legal acts. In: Historical review. Collection of the Historical Society at the Imperial Petrograd University, 21. Petrograd: M. M. Stasyulevich’s Type, censor. 8—19. (In Russ.).
17. Volkov, S. S. (1974). Vocabulary of Russian petitioners of the XVII century. Leningrad: Publishing House of the Leningrad University. 164 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Zinovyeva E.I. Stereotypic Formulas of Business Documents and Monuments of Common Language of Moscow Rus’ in 16th and 17th Centuries (Systematizing Approach). Nauchnyi dialog. 2023;12(2):9-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-2-9-26
Views:
415
Email this article 