Interpretations of Plot about Alceste: from Euripide’s Social and Domestic Drama to Franz Fühmann’s “Play with Music in Ancient Landscapes”

The significance of the study is due to the need to update the memory of the personality and work of the East German writer Franz Fuhmann, undeservedly forgotten in the era of united Germany. The novelty of the proposed study is due to the fact that the materials that testify to the long and painstaking preparatory work to create a play about Alces and this work itself have not only not been translated, but have not been studied in Russian German studies either. It is noted that the problem of “inclusion” of artistic consciousness in new media makes it necessary to approach the reception of the classical heritage from a new point of view. It is indicated that Franz Fuman is one of the brightest experimenters in this field. It is shown that psychological rethinking of traditional mythological situations and the creation of their new versions prevail in his dramatic experiments, which allows us to see the timeless grain of the myth. It is argued that in the named work the writer does not deviate from the formulation of the burning topics of our time, but elevates their understanding to a higher level of the eternal questions of mankind. It is emphasized that in this context it is not surprising that the writer turned to the traditions of antiquity, primarily mythology. The author of the article believes that the study of the dramatic experiments of Franz Fumann helps to supplement the picture of the genre and style diversity of his work with new facts.

1. Burnett, A. P. (1965). The Virtues of Admetus. Classical Philology, 60 (4): 240—255.

2. Burnett, A. P. (1971). Catastrophe Survived: Euripide’s Plays of Mixed Reversal. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 234 p.

3. Buxton, R. G. A. (2003). Euripide’s Alkestis: Five Aspects of an Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 170—186. ISBN 0198721854.

4. Conacher, D. J. (1967). Euripidean Drama: Myth, Theme and Structure. Toronto. London: University of Toronto Press. 354 p.

5. Conacher, D. J. (1988). Euripides. Alcestis. Warminster: Aris & Phillips. 274 p.

6. Dale, A. M. (1954). Euripides Alcestis. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 130 p.

7. Gasparov, M. L. (1997). The plot of the ancient Greek tragedy. In: Selected works, 1. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures. 449—482. (In Russ.).

8. Mann, T. (1960). “Joseph and his brothers.” Report. In: Collected works: in 10 volumes, 9. Moscow: GIHL. P. 175. (In Russ.).

9. Nikolsky, B. M. (2012). The structure and theme of Euripide’s Alceste. “History”. Electronic scientific and educational journal, 8 (16). Available at: https://history.jes.su/ s207987840000443-6-1 / (accessed 26.09.2022). (In Russ.).

10. Nikolsky, B. M. (2017). “Alceste” of Euripides: the problem of interpretation. Indo-European linguistics and classical philology, 21: 595—628. (In Russ.).

11. Ovcharova, S. V. (2009). Myth in the works of Franz Fuhrer: features of interpretation. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Yekaterinburg. 22 p. (In Russ.).

12. Prignitz, I. (1989). Nachwort / Fühmann F. Alkestis. Stück mit Musik in einem ersten Akt, einem zweiten Akt, zwei dritten Akten und einem Vorspiel, dazu=deliziös-verklärte Varianten zur Hintergrundforschung mythologisch bedingter Träume beziehungsweise Landschaften im Weltbild antiker Dramen oder so. 5 Ostraka-Palimpseste aus dem Kramladen der Antike (in Aquatintamanier) von Heiner Ulrich. Rostock: VEB Hinstorff Verlag. 109—119. ISBN 3-356-00222-8. (In Germ.).

13. Sharypina, T. A. (2002). Homeric motifs in Franz Fyman’s radio play “Shadows”. In: New about the old and the new. Part”. Foreign literature of modern times. Translations. Article. Comments on a textbook for students. Samara: [b. i.]. 228—248. (In Russ.).

14. Sharypina, T. A. (2011). Franz Fuhrerman: the creative path in the context of the epoch. New Russian humanitarian studies. Literary criticism. Available at: http://www.nrgumis.ru/articles/archives/fullart.php?aid=317&binnrubrikplarticles=344 (accessed 27.09.2022). (In Russ.).

15. Sharypina, T. A. (2022). Poetological functions of the author’s modality in the artistic practice of F. Fyuman and B. Shlink. Scientific notes of Petrozavodsk State University, 44 (1): 81—88. (In Russ.).

16. Smith, W. D. (1960). The Ironic Structure in Alcestis. Phoenix, 14: 127—145.

17. Tsvetkov, Yu. L. (2012). Interpretation of the myth of Alceste in Georg Kaiser’s drama “Fire in the Opera House”. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod State University named after N. I. Lobachevsky, 1—2: 259—263. (In Russ.).

18. Verrall, A. W. (1985). Euripides the Rationalist: a Study in the History of Art and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 263 p.

19. Vlas (Vladislav Nyaklyaev). Translator’s Preface. Euripides. Alceste. Available at: https:// www.netslova.ru/perevody/euripides.html (accessed 24.09.2022). (In Russ.).

20. Von Fritz, K. (1962). Euripides Alkestis und ihre modernen Nachahmer und Kritiker. In: Antike und moderne Tragödie, neun Abhandlungen. Berlin: De Gruyter. 27—70. (In Germ.).