Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Josef Váchal’s Authorial Intentionality as a Manifestation of Aesthetic Trends in Culture at Turn of 19th—20th Centuries

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-3-248-268

Abstract

The question of the formation of a new type of creator-demiurge in the conditions of culture at the turn of the 19th—20th centuries is considered. Particular attention is paid to the personality of the Czech artist Josef Váchal. The relevance of the study is determined by several factors: firstly, the recent increased interest in Czech literature in Russia and, at the same time, its insufficient representation both in the book market and in the scientific community; secondly, the lack of Russian-language criticism directly devoted to the work and the author’s figure of J. Váchal. Describing the cultural and historical environment in which the creative personality of the artist was formed, the authors of the article refer both to the general European context and directly to the Czech language. It has been established that the work of J. Váchal has a deep connection with the history of his country. In particular, the artist’s reaction to certain moods prevailing in Czech society at that time explains his passion for baroque aesthetics, the cornerstone of his poetics. In addition, Váchal’s biography largely determined the themes and form of his works, so understanding him as a specific personality of the 19th-20th centuries contributes to a more detailed analysis of his work.

About the Authors

D. A. Zudina
National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation

Daria A. Zudina - Master of Philology, Postgraduate Student, Department of Foreign Literature.

Nizhny Novgorod



T. A. Sharypina
National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation

Tatiana A. Sharypina - Doctor of Philology, Professor, Head of the Department of Foreign Literature.

Nizhny Novgorod



References

1. Agapova, A. Culture of Russian speech: PhD. Diss. Olomouc, 2014. 199 p.(In Russ.).

2. Artamoshkina, L. E. (2012). Biography of the generation: the personification of history. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg Philosophical Society. 208 p. (In Russ.).

3. Bajerová, M. O. (1991). Josefu Váchalovi, Pražská imaginace.Praha. 188 s. (In Pol.).

4. Bobrakov-Timoshkin, A. (2002). «The Czech Question»: attempts to understand ourselves. Author's project of Alexander Bobrakov-Timoshkin.«Czech Culture». Available at: http://kultura.prag.ru/litera07.htm. (In Russ.).

5. Braginskaya, N. (1977). Ekphrasis as a type of text. (On the problem of structural classification). Slavic and Balkan linguistics. Carpatho-East Slavonic Parallels. In: Klepiko-va. G. P. (ed.). Moscow: Nauka. 259—283. (In Russ.).

6. Bychkova, E. A. Culture of Russian speech: PhD. Diss. Moscow, 2001. 141 p. (In Russ.).

7. Dyrynk, K. (1930). Písma Josefa Váchala. Brno: Arno Sáňka. 41 s. (In Pol.).

8. Gryakalova, N. Yu. Culture of Russian speech: Doct. Diss. St. Petersburg, 1998. 355 p. (In Russ.).

9. Huizinga, J. (1992). Homo ludens. In the shadow of tomorrow. Moscow: Progress Academy. 452 p. (In Russ.).

10. Ivanova, O. N. (2007). «Synthesis» in the theoretical and artistic practices of the XVIII century as a philosophical and theoretical source of the concept of R. Wagner's Gesamtkun-stwerk. Vestnik KSU. 2: 196—199. (In Russ.).

11. Kolesnikova, A. V. Culture of Russian speech: PhD. Diss. Novosibirsk, 2003. 181 p. (In Russ.).

12. Kolyanov, A. Yu. Culture of Russian speech: PhD. Diss.St. Petersburg, 2017. 101 p. (In Russ.).

13. Konůpek, J. (1947). Josef Váchal mezi ostatními, in : Život v umění. Praha: Jan Pohořelý. 108 s. (In Pol.).

14. Kotek, J. (2008). Neuchopitelný Josef Váchal. Pelhřimov: Novátiskárna Pelhřimov. 119 s. (In Pol.).

15. Lotman, Yu. M. (2002). Abstracts to the problem «Art in a number of modeling systems». Articles on the semiotics of culture and art (Series «World of Arts»). Saint Petersburg: Academic project. 274—293. (In Russ.).

16. Olič, J. (2000). Neznámý Váchal: život umělce. 1. vydání. Praha. Litomyšl: Ladislav Horáček. Paseka. 254 s. (In Pol.).

17. Pigulevsky, V. O. (2002). Irony and fiction: from romanticism to postmodernism. Rostov-on-Don: Tome. 418 p. (In Russ.).

18. Samsonova, S. A. Culture of Russian speech: PhD. Diss. Kostroma, 2003. 147 p. (In Russ.).

19. Saparov, M. (1982). Verbal image and visible image (painting - photography - word).Literature and painting: coll. articles. Leningrad: Nauka. 66—93. (In Russ.).

20. Sarychev, V. A. (1991). Aesthetics of Russian modernism: the problem of «life-creation». Vo-ronezh: Voronezh University Publishing House. 316 p. (In Russ.).

21. Timashkov, A. Culture of Russian speech: PhD. Diss.St. Petersburg, 2012. 174 p. (In Russ.).

22. Voevodina, L. N. Culture of Russian speech: Doct. Diss. Moscow, 2002. 282 p. (In Russ.).

23. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Psychology of art. Moscow: Art. 329 p. (In Russ.).

24. Wagner, R. (1871). Das Kunstwerk der Zukunft. Sämtliche Schriften und Dichtungen. 5. Auflage Dritter Band. Leipzig. 334 s. (InPol.).

25. Wagner, R. (1978). Selected works. In: Barsova, I. A., Osherova, S. A. Moscow: Art. 695 p. (In Russ.).

26. Yatsenko, E. (2011). «Love painting, poets...» Ekphrasis as an artistic and ideological model. Questions of Philosophy, 11: 47—57. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Zudina D.A., Sharypina T.A. Josef Váchal’s Authorial Intentionality as a Manifestation of Aesthetic Trends in Culture at Turn of 19th—20th Centuries. Nauchnyi dialog. 2023;12(3):248-268. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-3-248-268

Views: 385


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)