Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Structural Features of Metaphors in English Aphorisms within Philosophical Discourse

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-6-65-87

Abstract

Structural analysis of aphorisms in philosophical discourse is conducted using a semantic-cognitive approach. The study focuses on aphorisms from Francis Bacon’s treatise “Novum Organum”. The objects, purposes, and bases of metaphorization are identified and classified, revealing phenomena that are objectified through metaphors and denote key areas of conceptualization in Bacon’s linguistic worldview. It is determined that the objects, sources, and bases of metaphorization are highly differentiated, highlighting personifications of the human image in Bacon’s linguistic worldview: the thinking, spiritual, social, and emotional aspects of humans. The majority of objects are anthropomorphic phenomena, including categories of moral order, age characteristics, intellectual abilities, and attributes of social interaction. The sources of metaphors touch upon the social role of humans, their physio-logical sensations from interacting with the environment, and demonstrate the empirical nature of the author’s linguistic personality. Among the sources of metaphors, the most representative group consists of naturalistic images. Francis Bacon refers to natural phenomena and objects as tools for creating complex philosophical concepts.

About the Author

I. Yu. Lavrinenko
Voronezh State Technical University
Russian Federation

Irina Yu. Lavrinenko - кандидат филологических наук, доцент кафедры иностранных языков и технологии перевода.

Voronezh



References

1. Arseneault, M. (2006). Metaphor: Philosophical Theories, Encyclopedia of Language & Lin-guistics (Second Edition). Elsevier. December. 40—43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01194-9.

2. Arutyunova, N. D. (1990). Metaphor and discourse Theory of metaphors. Moscow: Progress. 5—53. ISBN 5-01-001599-4. (In Russ.).

3. Baranov, A. N., Karaulov, Yu. N. (1991). Russian Political Metaphor. Materials for the dictionary. Moscow: Institute of the Russian Language of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 193 p. ISBN 5-85054-007-5. (In Russ.).

4. Carston, R., Xinxin Yan. (2023). Metaphor processing: Referring and predicating. Cogni-tion, 238: 105534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105534.

5. Chudinov, A. P. (2003). Metaphorical mosaic in modern political communication: Mono-graph. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University. 248 p. (In Russ.).

6. Gadamer, G.–H. (1991). About the circle of understanding. In: Relevance of the beautiful. Moscow: Iskusstvo. 366 p. (In Russ.).

7. Ivanova, E. V. (2009). “The ideal philosophical text” in the history of philosophy. Analysis of cultural studies, 15: P. 4. (In Russ.).

8. Kubryakova, E. S. (2004). Language and knowledge: On the way to gaining knowledge about language: Parts of speech from a cognitive point of view. The role of language in the knowledge of the world. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture. 560 p. ISBN 5-94457-174-8. (In Russ.).

9. Kurennoy, V. (2005). How to make our translations clear. Logos, 2 (47): 72—82. (In Russ.).

10. Lakoff, J. (2004). Metaphors We Live By / Metaphors We Live By. Moscow: Unified URSS. 256 p. ISBN 5-354-00222-2. (In Russ.).

11. Lavrinenko, I. Y. (2014). Bulletin of the Voronezh State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Series. Modern linguistic and methodological-didactic research, 3 (23): 30—47. (In Russ.).

12. Lavrinenko, I. Y., Fomina, Z. E. (2014). Cognitive strategies as mental determinants in the linguistic objectification of the concepts of reason and feeling in the philosophical discourse of F. Bacon. Bulletin of the Voronezh State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Series. Modern linguistic and methodological-didactic re-search, 1 (21): 23—37. (In Russ.).

13. Leontieva, T. V. (2008). Human intelligence in the Russian language picture of the world. Yekaterinburg: Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University. 280 p. ISBN 978-5-8050-0303-6. (In Russ.).

14. Mishankina, N. A. (2010). Metaphor in science: paradox or norm? Tomsk: Tomsk University Press. 282 p. (In Russ.).

15. Nikiforov, A. L. (2009). The nature of philosophy. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Phi-losophy. Sociology. Political science, 3 (7): 5—16. (In Russ.).

16. Sergodeeva, E. A. (2014). Rationality of modern philosophical discourse. Humanitarian and legal studies, 2: 135—138. (In Russ.).

17. Shnyakina, N. Y. (2023). Metaphor as a model of deductive knowledge: composite metaphors in the German scientific text. Actual problems of philology and pedagogical linguis-tics, 1: 59—69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2023-1-59-69. (In Russ.).

18. Steen, G. (2004). Can discourse properties of metaphor affect metaphor recognition? Journal of Pragmatics, 36 (7): 1295—1313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.014.

19. Tsvetkova, I. V. (2004). Philosophical text and philosophical culture in their dynamically de-terministic relationship: Hermeneutic aspect. Doct. Diss. Yekaterinburg. 265 p. (In Russ.).

20. Tyupa, V. I. (2002). Artistic discourse: (introduction to the theory of literature). Tver: Tver State University. 80 p. (In Russ.).

21. Yakovleva, E. L. (2019). Antinomianism of the electronic nomad: the experience of philosophical reception through metaphors. Humanities: actual problems of humanities and education, 1: 58—68. DOI: 10.15507/2078-9823.045.019.201901.058-068. (In Russ.).

22. Yaroslavtseva, I. P. (2005). Theory of discourse and specificity of modern philosophical dis-course. News of the SFU. Technical sciences, 9. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/teoriya-diskursa-i-spetsifika-sovremennogo-filosofskogo-diskursa (accessed 07.07.2023). (In Russ.).

23. Zubova, M. V. (2008). Philosophical text as philosophical communication. Izvestiya RSPU named after A. I. Herzen, 58: P. 126. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Lavrinenko I.Yu. Structural Features of Metaphors in English Aphorisms within Philosophical Discourse. Nauchnyi dialog. 2023;12(6):65-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-6-65-87

Views: 306


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)