Harlequinade Grotesque in D. H. Lawrence’s Novel ‘Lady Chatterley’s Lover’
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-6-228-244
Abstract
The article is devoted to the interpretation of D. H. Lawrence’s novel ‘Lady Chatterley’s Lover’. The basis for reading the novel in a carnival key is provided by both the facts of Lawrence’s biography and the presence of carnival interpretations in his other works in recent decades. The study of the harlequinade imagery in the novel makes it possible to characterize the ‘Lawrentinian’ harlequinade grotesque and its role in reflecting the writer’s worldview. Through the analysis of the characters, the author establishes similarities between Mellors, Connie, and Clifford with Harlequin, Columbine, and Pierrot. Allusions to popular pantomimes and farces of the 18th and 19th centuries, such as ‘Merry Sherwood, or Harlequin-Forrester’ (1795) by O’Keeffe and ‘Pierrot Fumiste’ (1882) by Laforgue, are identified. In addition, a hypothesis is put forward regarding the reasons for the writer’s choice of specific names for his characters. In particular, a version is proposed according to which the character Clifford Chatterley owes his name to Clifford Essex — the most popular performer of the Pierrot role in England at the beginning of the 20th century. The author argues that in the novel, Lawrence reproduces the plot and composition of English pantomime in order to contrast buffoonish laughter with the grim aspects of England’s reality in the 1920s.
About the Author
A. A. Kosareva
Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna A. Kosareva - PhD in Philology, associate professor, Department of Linguistics and Professional Communications in Foreign Languages.
Yekaterinburg
References
1. Ashdown-Lecointre, L. (2007). Pierrot and the Pantomime. In: Novel Stages: Drama and the Novel in Nineteenth-century France. Newark: University of Delaware Press. 242 p. ISBN 9780874139778.
2. Buckley, W. K. (1993). Lady Chatterley’s Lover: Loss and Hope. New York: Twayne Pub-lishers. 121 p. ISBN 0805794328.
3. Burden, R. (2021). Radicalizing Lawrence: Critical Interventions in the Reading and Reception of D. H. Lawrence’s Narrative Fiction. Amsterdam: Brill. 388 p. ISBN 9789004487017.
4. Clayton, J. D. (1993). Pierrot in Petrograd: Commedia dell’Arte / Balagan in Twentieth-Century Russian Theatre and Drama. Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press. 369 p. ISBN 9780773511361.
5. Dietz, S. T. (2022). The Complete Language of Herbs: A Definitive and Illustrated History. New York: Wellfleet Press. 256 p. ISBN 9780760373828.
6. Ellis, D., Mills, H. (2009). D. H. Lawrence’s Non-Fiction: Art, Thought and Genre. Сam-bridge: Cambridge University Press. 193 p. ISBN 9780521327398.
7. Green, M., Swan, J. (1993). The Triumph of Pierrot: the Commedia dell’Arte and the Modern Imagination. The United States of America. The Pennsylvania State University Press. 309 p. ISBN 002-545420.
8. Gurudev, S. (2006). The Novels of D. H. Lawrence. New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers & Dis-tributors. 112 p. ISBN 9788126905690.
9. Humma, J. B. (1983). The Interpenetrating Metaphor: Nature and Myth in Lady Chatterley’s Lover. PMLA, 1 (98): 77—86.
10. Jackson, D. (1978). The “Old Pagan Vision”: Myth and Ritual in “Lady Chatterley’s Lover”. The D. H. Lawrence Review, 3 (11): 260—271.
11. Jonsson, S. (2000). Subject Without Nation: Robert Musil and the History of Modern Identity. Durham & London: Duke University Press. 376 p. ISBN 9780822325703.
12. Kondrakov, S. A. (2011). The loss of the human image in D. G. Lawrence’s novel “Lady Chatterley”s Lover”. Bulletin of the Moscow University, 4 (9): 90—106. (In Russ).
13. Lidington, T. (2022). “Don’t Forget The Pierrots!'” The Complete History of British Pierrot Troupes & Concert Parties. New York: Taylor & Francis. 432 p. ISBN 9781000686142.
14. Mandel, J. (1977). Medieval romance and “Lady Chatterley’s lover”. The D. H. Lawrence Re-view, 1 (10): 20—33.
15. Moynahan, J. (1959). Lady Chatterley’s Lover: The Deed of Life. ELH, 1 (26): 66—90.
16. O’Brien, J. (2004). Harlequin Britain: pantomime and entertainment, 1690—1760. USA: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 274 p. ISBN 9780801879104.
17. Pustovalov, A. V. (2009). “Lady Chatterley’s Lover” by D. G. Lawrence: myth and fairy tale in the structure of the novel. In: World literature in the context of culture. Perm: Perm State National Research University. 133—136. (In Russ).
18. Radulescu, D. (2014). Women’s Comedic Art as Social Revolution: Five Performers and the Lessons of Their Subversive Humor. The USA: McFarland. 267 p. ISBN 9780786488582.
19. Ribitzky, T. (2017). Cosmic Pessimism in Lady Chatterley’s Lover. The D. H. Lawrence Re-view, 1 (42): 71—99.
20. Rudlin, J. (1994). Commedia Dell’Arte: An Actor’s Handbook. New York: Routledge. 296 p. ISBN 9781134945887.
21. Rudlin, J. (2022). The Metamorphoses of Commedia Dell’Arte: Whatever Happened to Har-lequin? Palgrave Macmillan. 249 p. ISBN 9783031105111.
22. Squires, M. (1972). Pastoral Patterns and Pastoral Variants in Lady Chatterley’s Lover. ELH, 1 (39): 129—146.
23. Storey, R. (2014). Pierrot: A Critical History of a Mask. USA: Princeton University Press. 410 p. ISBN 9781400854820.
Review
For citations:
Kosareva A.A. Harlequinade Grotesque in D. H. Lawrence’s Novel ‘Lady Chatterley’s Lover’. Nauchnyi dialog. 2023;12(6):228-244. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-6-228-244
Views:
299
Email this article 