Functional-Semantic Features of Complex Sentences of Purpose in British and American Variants of English
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-7-26-46
Abstract
The functional-semantic features of purpose clauses introduced by conjunctions so that, lest, in order that, for fear that, in the hope that, and to the end that are examined in this study. These conjunctions differ in their frequency and expressiveness. The material for the study was taken from the Corpus of Contemporary American English and the British National Corpus. The novelty of the research lies in specifying the list of differential features of the categorical grammatical value of complex sentences of purpose. It is demonstrated that complex sentences with purpose conjunctions are used in literary, journalistic, scientific, and conversational texts, but their frequency differs not only depending on the type of discourse but also on the language variant. Based on statistical data, it is confirmed that Present Subjunctive forms are the most commonly used in purpose clauses regardless of the language variant. Types of purpose clauses are analyzed: proper-purpose, argumentative-purpose, syncretic, and anti-purpose clauses. It is established that the first ones, which are not complicated by additional shades of meaning, are most frequent in American texts, while the third ones, containing indications of circumstances for achieving the goal, are most commonly used in British texts.
About the Authors
N. V. Solovyeva
Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nataliya V. Solovyeva, Doctor of Philology, Professor Departament I-12 “Linguistics and Translation Studies”
Moscow
N. A. Skitina
State University of Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nina A. Skitina, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Departament of English Philology
Mytishchi
References
1. A book about grammar. For teachers of Russian as a foreign language. (2018). St. Petersburg: Zlatoust. 752 p. ISBN 978-5-86547-967-3. (In Russ.).
2. Akimova, E. N. (2012). Category of conditionality: status, composition, levels of implementation. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 2: Linguistics, 1 (15): 250—254. (In Russ.).
3. Aksenova, D. A. (2017). Comparative analysis of ways of expressing goals in Russian and English. Modern studies of social problems, 8 (6—2): 11—16. DOI: 10.12731/2218-7405-2017-6-2-11-16. (In Russ.).
4. Bondarko, A. V. (2016). Principles of functional grammar and questions of aspectology. Moscow: Editorial URSS. 208 p. ISBN 5-354-00347-4. (In Russ.).
5. Communicative grammar of the Russian language. (2019). Moscow: Azbukovnik Publishing Center LLC. 524 p. ISBN 978-5-91172-188-6. (In Russ.).
6. Druzhinina, S. I. (2008). Compound sentences of conditionality: types and varieties. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 26: 30—37. (In Russ.).
7. Gak, V. G. (2023). Theoretical grammar of the French language. Moscow: KDU University Book. 862 p. ISBN 5-7913-0035-2. (In Russ.).
8. Glazunov, M. V. (2015). Semantic varieties of complex sentences with subordinate objectives. Scientific notes of the Oryol State University, 6 (69): 120—123. (In Russ.).
9. Halliday, M. A. K., Hasan, R. (2014). Cohesion in English. London: Routledge. 394 p.
10. Koprov, V. Yu. (2016). Semantic-functional grammar in modern linguistics and the practice of teaching languages as foreign languages. In: Semantic-functional grammar in linguistics and linguodidactics: a collection of materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Methodological conference with international participation dedicated to the 65th anniversary of Viktor Yuryevich Koprov (Voronezh State University, October 21—22, 2016. Voronezh: NAUKA-UNIPRESS Publishing House. 6—15. ISBN 978-5-9765-2474-3. (In Russ.).
11. Lloyd, Ch. A. (1937). Is the Subjunctive Dying? The English Journal, 26 (5): 369—73.
12. Beloshapkova, V. A. (2021). Modern Russian language. Moscow: Alliance. 926 p. (In Russ.).
13. Nissenbaum, J. (2005). States, events and VP structure: evidence from purposive adjuncts. North East Linguistic Society (NELS 36), University of Massachusetts, Amherst, October 28—30. Available at: http://userhome.brooklyn.cuny.edu/jnissenbaum/Research/files/h2005-PurposeClause-VP-structure-NELS.pdf (accessed 20.05.2023).
14. Parrott, M. (2010). Grammar for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: CUP. 477 p. ISBN 0521885051.
15. Petrova, E. S. (2002). A complex sentence in English. Variants of form, meaning and usage: Textbook. Moscow: GIS; St. Petersburg: Faculty of Philology of St. Petersburg State University. 136 p. ISBN 5-288-01853-7. (In Russ.).
16. Pripytok, I. I. (2019). Fundamentals of the syntax of the English language: textbook. The manual. Moscow: FLINT. 448 p. ISBN 978-5-9765-2125-4. (In Russ.).
17. Robertson, S. (1939). British-American Differentiations in Syntax and Idiom. American Speech, 14 (4): 43—54.
18. Samarina, N. V. (2012). Functional semantic field as an object of study in modern grammar. Bulletin of the Adygea State University. Series 2: Philology and Art History, 1: 273—277. (In Russ.).
19. Slyusareva, N. A. (1984). Syntax and morphology in the light of a functional approach. Philological Sciences, 5: 36—41. (In Russ.).
20. Smirnitsky, A. I. (2019). Syntax of the English language. Moscow: URSS Editorial Publishing House. 294 p. ISBN 978-5-397-00832-7. (In Russ.).
21. Swan, M. (2009). Practical English Usage. Oxford: OUP. 653 p.
22. The Cambridge handbook of Systemic Functional Lingusitics. (2019). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 836 p. ISBN 9781316337936.
23. Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: six case studies. TESOL, Quarterly, 17: 165—187.
Review
For citations:
Solovyeva N.V., Skitina N.A. Functional-Semantic Features of Complex Sentences of Purpose in British and American Variants of English. Nauchnyi dialog. 2023;12(7):26-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-7-26-46
Views:
361
Email this article 