Motifs of Fyodor Dostoevsky’s ‘Notes from Dead House’ in Hans Fallada’s Novel ‘Wer einmal aus dem Blechnapf frißt…’
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-7-142-160
Abstract
The novels ‘Notes from the Dead House’ by Fyodor Dostoevsky and ‘Wer einmal aus dem Blechnapf frißt…’ (‘Who Once Drinks from the Prison Chalice’) by Hans Fallada are analyzed in terms of literary connections. The relevance of the study is due to the need for a comprehensive and multifaceted examination of Hans Fallada’s literary dialogue with Fyodor Dostoevsky. A number of similar motifs are identified, as well as the fact that there are allusive “cross-references” between the characters of the novels. It is noted that both authors show the destructive influence of imprisonment on the criminal’s personality. It is emphasized that in both novels, the criminal is deprived of the ability for spiritual revival, and the writers criticize the unjust social system that pushes the “little” person to break the law. Drawing on the traditions of Fyodor Dostoevsky, Hans Fallada shows in his novel that life for prisoners, both in prison and after release, is akin to being in a “dead house”, as it deprives the “humiliated and insulted” heroes of the opportunity to change their fate. It is concluded that comparing the novels “Notes from the Dead House” and “Who Once Drinks from the Prison Chalice” allows for identifying similarities in their ideas and outlining perspectives for further research on the reception of Fyodor Dostoevsky’s artistic experience in Hans Fallada’s work.
About the Author
L. A. Melnikova
Saratov State University, Balashov Institute (branch)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lyubov A. Melnikova, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Philological Disciplines
Balashov
References
1. Dronova, O. A. (2005). Man and history in G. Fallada’s novel “Little Man — what’s next?”. Bulletin of the Tambov University. Humanities series, 2 (38): 47—52. (In Russ.).
2. Fedorova, E. A. (2019). The author in the artistic discourse of “Notes from the dead house” by F. M. Dostoevsky. Social and humanitarian knowledge, 5 (2): 181—186. (In Russ.).
3. Friedlander, G. M. (1964). Dostoevsky’s Realism. Moscow; Leningrad: Nauka. 405 p. (In Russ.).
4. Friedlander, G. M. (1978). Dostoevsky, German and Austrian prose of the twentieth century. In: Dostoevsky in foreign literatures. Leningrad: Nauka. 117—174. (In Russ.).
5. Gabdullina, V. I. (2015). The motive of death-resurrection in the Siberian text of F. M. Dostoevsky. Plotology and plotography, 2: 101—108. (In Russ.).
6. Gerigk, H. Y. (2016). Dostoevsky’s literary skill in development. From “Notes from the Dead House” to "The Brothers Karamazov”. Saint Petersburg: Pushkin House Publishing House; Nestor-History. 320 p. ISBN 978-5-87781-042-6. (In Russ.).
7. Gessel, A. (1976). Hans Fallada: Leben und Werk. Berlin: Hans Fallada. 176 S. (In Germ.)
8. Itokawa, K. (1995). Notes about the “Living House”. In: Dostoevsky in the cultural context of the twentieth century. Omsk : Publishing House of OmSPU. 152—157. (In Russ.).
9. Karlova, T. S. (1974). On the structural meaning of the image of the “dead house”. In: Dostoevsky. Materials and research, 1. Leningrad: Nauka. 135—146. (In Russ.).
10. Kaspar, G. (1990). Historical and literary notes. In: H. Fallada. Collected works in 4 volumes, 1. Moscow: Fiction. 689—717. (In Russ.).
11. Krinitsyn, A. B. (2007). Dostoevsky in Germany. In: Dostoevsky and the twentieth Century; In 2 volumes, 2. Moscow: IMLI RAS. 178—249. (In Russ.).
12. Lotman, Yu. M. (1997). The plot space of the Russian novel. In: About Russian literature. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: Iskusstvo — SPb. 848 p. (In Russ.).
13. Malova, Yu. V. (2003). Formation and development of “camp prose” in Russian literature of the XIX—XX centuries. PhD Diss. Saransk. 236 p. (In Russ.).
14. Manthey, J. (1973). Hans Fallada in Selbstzeugnissen und Bilddokumenten. Hamburg: Reinbek. 188 S. (In Germ.).
15. Melnikova, L. A. (2022). The motives of “Poor People” by F. M. Dostoevsky in G. Fallada’s novel “Little Man, what’s next?”. Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 8 (36). Available at: https://rulb.org/archive/8-36-2022-december/10.18454/RULB.2022.36.22 (accessed 12.07.2023) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18454/RULB.2022.36.22. (In Russ.).
16. Mineralov, A. Yu. (2021). “Hard labor camp” story-figurative tradition in Russian prose of the twentieth century. Bulletin of the Kemerovo State University of Culture and Arts, 18: 106—112. (In Russ.).
17. Mishin, I. (1974). Dostoevsky and foreign writers (the main problems of creativity, traditions and innovation): studies. The manual on the special course. Rostov-on-Don: [b. i.]. 135 p. (In Russ.).
18. Motyleva, T. L. (1971). Dostoevsky and foreign writers of the twentieth century. Questions of literature, 5: 96—128. (In Russ.).
19. Petrova, Yu. V. (2021). The image of freedom in the story of F. M. Dostoevsky “Notes from the Dead House”. In: Dostoevsky in the change of epochs and generations. Materials of the II International Scientific Conference dedicated to the 200th anniversary of the birth of F. M. Dostoevsky. Omsk: Omsk State University named after F. M. Dostoevsky. 345—358. ISBN 978-5-7779-2566-4. (In Russ.).
20. Pol, D. V. (2022). “Camp prose”: a view from the XXI century. In: 1920s and 2020s: a look through the century: materials of the XXVI Sheshukov readings. Moscow: Moscow Pedagogical State University. 158—164. (In Russ.).
21. Starikova, L. S. (2015). “Camp prose” in the context of Russian literature of the twentieth century: concept, boundaries, specifics. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University, 2—4 (62): 169—174. (In Russ.).
22. Zakharov, V. N. (1985). Dostoevsky’s system of genres. Typology and poetics. Leningrad: Leningrad University Press. 209 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Melnikova L.A. Motifs of Fyodor Dostoevsky’s ‘Notes from Dead House’ in Hans Fallada’s Novel ‘Wer einmal aus dem Blechnapf frißt…’. Nauchnyi dialog. 2023;12(7):142-160. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-7-142-160
Views:
320
Email this article 