Models of Speech Ontogenesis in Russian Monolinguals and Russian-German Bilinguals
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-10-85-103
Abstract
The aim of the article is to examine models of speech ontogenesis in Russian monolinguals living in Russia and Russian-German bilinguals living in Germany. The study uses deviations from literary language norms in transcriptions of oral speech from 42 monolinguals and 48 bilinguals, supplemented by speech analysis data reflected in printed sources. Research methods include surveys, interviews, reading phonetically representative texts and picture stories, analysis of deviations from literary language norms, and synthesis of speech data. Two models of speech ontogenesis for monolinguals and four models for bilinguals are described. It is shown that the process of speech ontogenesis proceeds differently among Russian language speakers depending on a) whether it occurs in Russia or abroad, b) which variety of Russian language the speaker uses, c) at what age the foreign speaker of Russian language begins to actively use the language of the majority. It is established that the most important factor preventing the loss of elements of the Russian language in the diaspora is mastery of literary language norms. The dependence of the appearance of interference from the German language on the model of speech ontogenesis is determined.
Keywords
speech ontogenesis,
ontolinguistics,
literary language,
vernacular,
models of speech ontogenesis,
factors of speech development
Supporting agencies: The study is supported by Russian Science Foundation, project number 21-48-04401
About the Author
L. V. Moskovkin
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Leonid V. Moskovkin - Scopus Author ID: 57222508416, Doctor of Pedagogy, Professor, Department of Russian as a Foreign Language and Teaching Methodology.
St. Petersburg
References
1. Anstatt, T. (2010). Cognitive strategies of bilinguals: Solutions to lexical problems in the Russian of bilingual children and adolescents. In: The Slavic languages in the light of cognitive linguistics. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 217—239. (In Germ.).
2. Anstatt, T. (2011). Russian in the second generation: On the language situation of young people from Russian-speaking families in Germany. In: Eichinger, L. M., Plewnia, F., Steinle, M. (eds.). Language and integration. On multilingualism and migration. Tü-bingen: Narr Verlag. 101—128. ISBN 139783823366324. (In Germ.).
3. Bogdanova-Beglaryan, N. V., Blinova, O. V., Martynenko, G. Ya., Sherstinova, T. Yu. (2017). Russian language of everyday communication: grammatical aspect. Socio- and psycholinguistic studies, 5: 19—25. (In Russ.).
4. Bogdanova-Beglaryan, N. V., Blinova, O. V., Martynenko, G. Ya., Sherstinova, T. Yu. (2019). Corpus of the Russian language of everyday communication “One speech day” (ORD): current state and prospects. Proceedings of the Russian Language Institute them. V. V. Vinogradova, 21: 100—110. (In Russ.).
5. Braudo, T. E., Bobylova, M. Yu., Kazakova, M. V. (2017). Ontogenesis of speech development. Russian Journal of Child Neurology, 12 (1): 41—46. DOI: 10.17650/2073-8803-2017-12-1-41-46. (In Russ.).
6. Brehmer, B., Kurbangulova, T. (2017). Lost in transmission? Family language input and its role for the development of Russian as a heritage language in Germany. In: Isurin, L., Riehl, C. M. (eds.). Integration, Identity and Language Maintenance in Young Immigrants: Russian Germans or German Russians. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Ben-jamins Publishing Company. 225—268. DOI: 10.1075/impact.44.08bre.
7. Chemist, V. V. (2000). Poetics of the low, or vernacular as a cultural phenomenon. St. Petersburg: Philological Faculty of St. Petersburg State University. 272 p. ISBN 5-8465-0003-Х. (In Russ.).
8. Develaki, M. (2016). Key-Aspects of Scientific Modeling Exemplified by School Science Models: Some Units for Teaching Contextualized Scientific. Interchange, 47: 297—327. DOI: 10.1007/s10780-016-9277-7.
9. Eliseeva, M. B. (2005). Speech ontogenesis: a linguist’s view. Speech therapist, 4: 18—28. (In Russ.).
10. Erofeeva, T. I. (2009). Sociolect: stratification study. Perm: Perm State University. 239 p. ISBN 978-5-7944-1307-6. (In Russ.).
11. Filin, F. P. (1973). On the structure of the modern Russian literary language. Questions of linguistics, 2: 3—12. (In Russ.).
12. Gagarina, N., Klassert, A. (2018). Input dominance and development of home language in Russiangerman bilinguals. Frontiers in Communication, 3: 1—14. DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2018.00040.
13. Goldin, V. E. (2000). Internal typology of Russian speech and the structure of Russian studies. In: Russian language today, 1. Moscow: Azbukovnik. 53—65. ISBN 5-937860-02-0. (In Russ.).
14. Gorbanevsky, M. V., Karaulov, Yu. N., Shaklein, V. M. (2010). Don’t speak in rough language: about violations of the norms of literary speech in electronic and print media. Moscow: RUDN Publishing House. 300 p. ISBN 978-5-209-03219-9. (In Russ.).
15. Kapanadze, L. A. (1984). Modern urban vernacular and literary language. In: Zemskoy, E. A., Shmeleva, D. N. Urban vernacular: problems of study: collection of scientific works. Moscow: Science. 5—12. (In Russ.).
16. Kolesnikova, N. I. (2010). Teaching speech science disciplines at a non-philological university. Higher education in Russia, 12: 119—127. (In Russ.).
17. Kovrizhkina, D. G., Moskovkin, L. V. (2023). Lexical features of Russian speech of bilinguals in Germany and monolinguals in Russia: experimental study. Russian Stud-ies, 21(3): 293—305. DOI: 10.22363/2618-8163-2023-21-3-278-292. (In Russ.).
18. Krysin, L. P. (1989). Sociolinguistic aspects of studying the modern Russian language. Moscow: Nauka. 188 p. ISBN 5-02-010915-0. (In Russ.).
19. Leontyev, A. A. (ed.). (1974). Fundamentals of the theory of speech activity. Moscow: Nauka. 368 p. (In Russ.).
20. Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, Where Are You? New York: Penguin Young Readers Group. 32 p.
21. Neshchimenko, G. P. (2000). On the problem of functional differentiation of the ethnic language. In: Russian language today: collection of articles, 1. Moscow: Azbukovnik. 208—220. ISBN 5-937860-02-0. (In Russ.).
22. Petrova, A. A. (2009). Development of speech in ontogenesis: problems of modeling. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 2: Linguistics, 1 (9): 112—117. (In Russ.).
23. Polinsky, M. (2018). Heritage Languages and their Speakers. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 410 p. ISBN 9781107252349.
24. Polinsky, M., Kagan, O. (2007). Heritage Languages: In the ‘Wild’ and in the Classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1 (5): 368—395. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00022.x.
25. Priyatkina, A. F. (2000).Vernacular neoplasms: their basis and fate. Russian language today: collection of articles, 1. Moscow: Azbukovnik. 231—239. ISBN 5-937860-02-0. (In Russ.).
26. Ritchey, T. (1991). Analysis and synthesis: On scientific method — based on a study by Bernhard Riemann. Systems Research, 8(4): 21—41. DOI: 10.1002/SRES.3850080402.
27. Semenov, V. E., Yurkov, E. E. (2004). Russian speech in modern Russia: development trends based on the results of sociological research. St. Petersburg: Polytechnic. 45 p. ISBN 5-7325-0635-7. (In Russ.).
28. Semenova, M. A. (2010). On the features of teaching the discipline “Russian language and culture of speech” at a technical university. News of VolSTU, 9 (8): 146—149. (In Russ.).
29. Shalina, I. V. (2009). Ural urban vernacular: cultural scenarios. Yekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House. 444 p. ISBN 978-5-7996-0460-8. (In Russ.).
30. Shaposhnikov, V. N. (2012). Vernacular speech in the Russian language system at the present stage. Moscow: Librocom. 176 p. ISBN 978-5-397-02460-0. (In Russ.).
31. Tseitlin, S. N. (2017). Language and the child: a child’s mastery of his native language. Moscow: VLADOS. 240 p. ISBN 978-5-9500675-3-2. (In Russ.).
32. Tseitlin, S. N. (2018). Ontolinguistics on the way. News of the Russian State Pedagogical University. A. I. Herzen, 189: 12—22. (In Russ.).
33. Tskhovrebov, A. S., Shamonina, G. N. (2023). Complex sentence in Russian speech of bilinguals and monolinguals: analysis of deviations from the norm. Russian Studies, 21 (3): 293—305. DOI: 10.22363/2618-8163-2023-21-3-293-305. (In Russ.).
34. Voilova, K. A. The fate of common speech in the Russian language: author’s abstract of Doct Diss. Moscow: Publishing house of Moscow Pedagogical University, 2000. 40 p. (In Russ.).
35. Zemskaya, E. A. (2008). Active processes in the language of Russian abroad. In: Modern Russian language: active processes at the turn of the 20th—21st centuries. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures. 613—669. ISBN 5-9551-0216-7. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Moskovkin L.V. Models of Speech Ontogenesis in Russian Monolinguals and Russian-German Bilinguals. Nauchnyi dialog. 2023;12(10):85-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-10-85-103
Views:
326
Email this article 