Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Models of Dissertation Defense: From Post-Reform University to Soviet Era (Case of Saint Petersburg University)

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-10-452-472

Abstract

This study explores the issue of obtaining academic degrees in prerevolutionary Russia, a process that was an integral part of scientific initiation, allowing individuals to enter the ranks of the country’s intellectual elite. The aim of this paper is to determine the interplay between socio-political, corporate, and scientific elements in shaping the discourse of academic disputation. The analysis presented herein draws upon data primarily concerning Saint Petersburg University, which was a leading center for Russian scholarly activity. Specifically, this research utilizes unpublished materials from the minutes of the University Council meetings, journals of public assemblies of various faculties, and archives managed by the Saint Petersburg educational district, containing information on planned disputes. The authors conclude that there were eight formal obstacles a candidate had to overcome in the pursuit of a degree. The key hurdle was access to the public defense, which was a closed affair, being an internal corporate matter that excluded not only the degree candidate but also external authorities and society at large. The public defense of a thesis served more as a socially significant rite of corporate initiation, demonstrating the public importance of the corporation.

About the Authors

E. A. Rostovtsev
Tomsk State University; St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Evgeny A. Rostovtsev - Doctor of History, Associate Professor Leading Researcher, Professor.

Tomsk, St. Petersburg



I. V. Sidorchuk
Tomsk State University; St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Ilya V. Sidorchuk - PhD in History, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher.

Tomsk, St. Petersburg



References

1. Alevras, N. N. (2014). Dissertation culture as a historiographical concept. Ural Historical Bulletin, 4 (45): 111—120. (In Russ.).

2. Alevras, N. N. (2015). Dissertation history of a scientist as an event in the intellectual biog-raphy of Russian historians of the XIX century. Dialogue with time, 50: 218—241. (In Russ.).

3. Alevras, N. N., Grishina, N. V. (2014). Dissertation of historians and legislative norms (1860—1920’s). Russian History, 2: 77—90. (In Russ.).

4. Alexandrov, D. A. (2002). Fritz Ringer, German Mandarins and Russian scientists. New Lit-erary Review, 53: 90—104. (In Russ.).

5. Chirkov, S. V. (1996). The historian of Russian feudalism: Nikolai Pavlovich Pavlov-Silvansky. In: Historians of Russia. XVIII — the beginning of the XX century. Moscow: Scriptorium. 580—581. (In Russ.).

6. Demina, N. V. (2006). Dissertation practices in prerevolutionary Russia: publicity as a condition of scientific expertise. Human. Community. Management, 1: 120—127. (In Russ.).

7. Dissertation culture of the Russian historical and scientific community: the experience and practice of preparing and defending dissertations (XIX — early XX century): a collective monograph. (2022). Moscow; St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. 464 p. ISBN 978-5-4469-1933-8. (In Russ.).

8. Dvornichenko, A. Yu. (2013). From US with love and care: the phenomenon of George Ver-nadsky. Klio, 12: 135—138. (In Russ.).

9. Dvornichenko, A. Yu. (2013). G. V. Vernadsky and the St. Petersburg Historical School. Klio, 10: 88—91. (In Russ.).

10. Evdokimenkova, Yu. B., Soboleva, N. O. (2021). “Dissertation culture” of the Russian Em-pire: the experience of the Russian chemical community. Questions of the history of natural science and technology, 42 (2): 296—322. DOI: 10.31857/S020596060008747-3. (In Russ.).

11. Figurovsky, N. A., Romankov, N. I. (1967). Vladimir Alexandrovich Kistyakovsky. 1865—1952. Moscow: Nauka. 136 p. (In Russ.).

12. Fitzpatrick, S. (1970). The Commissariat of the Enlightenment. Soviet Organization of Education and the Arts under Lunacharsky. October 1917—1921. Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1970. — 380 p.

13. Gorin, D. G. (1996). On the question of the “professorial culture” of Russia in the XIX — early XX century. In: Russian culture and historical science of the XVIII—XX centuries. Collection of art. Bryansk: Publishing House of the Bryan State Pedagogical University. Unita. 42—51. (In Russ.).

14. Ioffe, A. F. (1947). Soviet physicists and prerevolutionary physics in Russia. Successes of physical sciences, XXXIII (4): 453—468. (In Russ.).

15. Ivanov, A. E. (1994). Academic degrees in the Russian Empire of the XVIII century. Moscow: IRI. 195 p. (In Russ.).

16. Ivanov, A. E. (2016). The scientific dignity of the Russian Empire. XVIII — early XX century. Training and scientific certification of professors and teachers of higher education. Moscow: Novy Chronograph. 656 p. ISBN 978-5-94881-334-9. (In Russ.).

17. Kaznacheev, D. A., Yakushev, A. N. (2006). Problems of legislation in the field of production in the academic degrees of the Russian Empire. Law and education, 3: 162—177. (In Russ.).

18. Loba, V. E. (2012). Dissertation research on criminal law, defended at universities of the Russian Empire (1815—1917). Pravo. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 4: 177—183. (In Russ.).

19. Professor of St. Petersburg University A. A. Foreigners. (2014). St. Petersburg: Supervave Group. 351 p. ISBN 978-5-9443-2796-3. (In Russ.).

20. Reischauer, E. O. (1957). Serge Elisseeff. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 20 (1/2): 1—35.

21. Ringer, F. (2008). The Decline of the German Mandarins: the Academic Community of Germany, 1890—1933. Moscow: New Literary Review. 645 p. ISBN 978-5-86793-635-8. (In Russ.).

22. Rostovtsev, E. A. (2017). Metropolitan University of the Russian Empire: academic class, society and power (the second half of the XIX — early XX century). Moscow: Political Encyclopedia. 903 p. ISBN 978-5-8243-2022-0. (In Russ.).

23. Rostovtsev, E. A. (2010). Russian mandarins. The metropolitan professorship, studentship and power at the beginning of the twentieth century. Rodina. Special edition. Education in Russia: yesterday, today, tomorrow. 47—52. (In Russ.).

24. Sanders, T. (2012). The third opponent: dissertations and the public profile of academic history in the Russian Empire. In: Historical culture of Imperial Russia: the formation of ideas about the past. Moscow: HSE Publishing House. 161—192. ISBN 978-5-7598-0914-2. (In Russ.).

25. Shapiro, A. L. (1993). Russian historiography from ancient times to 1917. Moscow: Assoc. “Russia”. 761 p. (In Russ.).

26. Skvortsov, A. M. (2010). Preparation and defense of master’s theses in the XIX century: the experience of M. S. Kutorga’s students. Mnemon: Research and publications on the history of the ancient world, 9: 451—468. (In Russ.).

27. Sveshnikov, O. V. (2016). Ivan Mikhailovich Greves and the St. Petersburg school of Medievalists of the early XX century. The fate of the scientific community. Moscow: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives. 420 p. ISBN 978-5-98712-659-2. (In Russ.).

28. Ulyanova, S. B. (2017). Strategies for building a scientific career in the context of the anthropology of science. Science in public dialogue: values, communications, organization. Materials of the international scientific conference. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg Polytechnic University. Unita. 159—160. (In Russ.).

29. Vishlenkova, E., Ilyina, K. (2013). About academic degrees and how a dissertation in Russia acquired scientific and practical significance. New Literary Review, 4 (122): 84—107. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Rostovtsev E.A., Sidorchuk I.V. Models of Dissertation Defense: From Post-Reform University to Soviet Era (Case of Saint Petersburg University). Nauchnyi dialog. 2023;12(10):452-472. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-10-452-472

Views: 331


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)