Stable Comparisons, Punctuation, and Usage
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-1-82-99
Abstract
This study offers an analysis of the methods of punctuation marking for stable comparisons in the punctuation practice of the 20th and 21st centuries. The research material comprises a micro-corpus, which includes more than 200 contexts of usage for stable comparisons, semantically similar free comparative constructions, as well as occasional transformations of stable comparisons. Punctuation actions involving stable comparisons are conceptualized as a distinct punctuation experiment, wherein diverse punctuation responses are formulated contingent upon the intrinsic nature of the stable comparisons themselves and the conditions governing their use. It is demonstrated that the punctuation practice of the 20th and 21st centuries reflects a trend towards punctuation differentiation not only between stable comparisons and free comparative constructions but also within stable comparisons themselves. The analysis of punctuation facts leads to the conclusion that the punctuation marking of stable comparisons is determined by derivational, pragmatic, and context-syntactic factors, which are taken into account by writers in their punctuation actions. It is shown that while derivational and context-syntactic factors prompt punctuation marking of stable comparisons, pragmatic factors merely render the use of delimiting commas more preferable. It is emphasized that adequate punctuation codification in the realm of stable comparisons cannot be achieved without reference to the evidence of punctuation practice.
About the Author
K. Ya. Seagal
Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kirill Ya. Seagal - Doctor of Philology,
Chief Researcher Department of Experimental Speech Research
Moscow
References
1. Bertuccelli, M. (2022). The cognitive complexity of punctuation. Lingue e linguaggi, 54: 15-29. - DOI: 10.1285/i22390359v54p15.
2. Blinov, G. I. (1990). Methods of studying punctuation at school. 2nd ed. Moscow: Prosveshchenie. 208 p. ISBN 5-09-001105-2. (In Russ.).
3. Bogoyavlensky, D. N. (1966). Psychology of learning spelling. 2nd ed. Moscow: Prosveshchenie. 307 p. (In Russ.).
4. Bulokhov, V. Ya. (2009). Punctuation actions: skills or abilities? Scientific notes of the N. G. Chernyshevsky Zabaikalsky State Humanitarian Pedagogical University, 6: 31—35. (In Russ.).
5. Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press. 262 p. ISBN 978-0-521-61683-6.
6. Dudnikov, A. V. (1963). Methods of studying syntax and punctuation in an eightyear school. Moscow: Uchpedgiz. 439 p. (In Russ.).
7. Fedorov, A. I. (1985). Figurative speech. Novosibirsk: Nauka. 119 p. (In Russ.).
8. Kobeleva, I. A. (2009). Phraseological unit from the point of view of punctuation. Russian language at school, 5: 36—39. (In Russ.).
9. Koltsova, L. M. (2006). Punctuation experiment in a literary text. Voronezh: VSU. 194 p. ISBN 5-9273-10-94-X. (In Russ.).
10. Kovshova, M. L. (2016). Phraseological comparative constructions with an unexpressed sign of comparison: possibilities and restrictions on use. In: Stable comparisons in the system of phraseology. St. Petersburg; Greifswald: St. Petersburg State University; University of Greifswald. 50—58. ISBN 978-5-8465-1529-1. (In Russ.).
11. Kuznetsova, I. V. (2016). Russian stable comparisons with the semantics of ‘not needed at all’ and ‘very necessary’. In: Stable comparisons in the system of phraseology. St. Petersburg; Greifswald: St. Petersburg State University; University of Greifswald. 90—100. ISBN 978-5-8465-1529-1. (In Russ.).
12. Lebedeva, L. A. (1999). Stable comparisons of the Russian language in phraseology and phraseography. Krasnodar: KubGU. 192 p. ISBN 5-8209-0022-7. (In Russ.).
13. Nekrasova, E. A. (1979). Punctuation in comparisons with the conjunction kak (‘as’) in modern poetic texts. In: Modern Russian punctuation. Moscow: Nauka. 222—235. (In Russ.).
14. Ogoltsev, V. M. (1978). Stable comparisons in the system of Russian phraseology. Leningrad: LSU. 160 p. (In Russ.).
15. Rosenthal, D. E. (1966). Handbook of spelling and punctuation. Moscow: CENTURY. 368 p. ISBN 5-7459-0077-6. (In Russ.).
16. Rubinstein, S. L. (2001). Fundamentals of general psychology. St. Petersburg: Peter. 720 p. ISBN 314-00016-4. (In Russ.).
17. Rudenko, A. K. (2005). Interaction of punctuation marks: a total complicated comma. Russian language at school, 1: 18—24. (In Russ.).
18. Rules of Russian spelling and punctuation. (1956). Moscow: Uchpedgiz. 176 p. (In Russ.).
19. Rules of Russian spelling and punctuation. The Complete Academic Handbook. (2014). Mos-cow: AST-PRESS BOOK. 432 p. ISBN 978-5-462-00930-3. (In Russ.).
20. Shubina, N. L. (2006). Punctuation of the modern Russian language. Moscow: Akademiya. 256 p. ISBN 5-7695-2881-8. (In Russ.).
21. Stable comparisons in the system of phraseology. (2016). St. Petersburg; Greifswald: St. Petersburg State University; University of Greifswald. 278 p. ISBN 978-5-8465-1529-1. (In Russ.).
22. Tretyakova, I. Y. (2011). Occasional phraseology. Kostroma: KSU named after N. A. Nekrasov. 290 p. ISBN 978-5-7591-1219-8. (In Russ.).
23. Vinogradov, V. A. (2018). Articles on general linguistics, comparative studies, typology. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures. 544 p. ISBN 978-5-907117-46-4. (In Russ.).
24. Vygotsky, L. S. (2006). Psychology of human development. Moscow: Smysl; Eksmo. 1136 p. - ISBN 5-699-13728-9. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Seagal K.Ya. Stable Comparisons, Punctuation, and Usage. Nauchnyi dialog. 2024;13(1):82-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-1-82-99
Views:
623
Email this article 