Commemorating Jubilee of Jan Hus in Russian Empire: Preconditions, History, Cultural Context.

The brief report on the activities of the St. Petersburg Slavic Charitable Committee for the year 1869 includes a record that society members discussed the celebration of the 500th anniversary of Jan Hus and established a prize for an essay on the Czech religious figure. The inclusion of Hus in the list of “jubilarians” worthy of honor not only highlights the significance of this religious thinker for the Slavic world but also touches upon certain political aspects of Russian history. The article analyzes the reasons for the Russian public's attention to Hus’s persona, provides a characterization of the views of Russian intellectuals at the time of the contest announcement regarding the legacy of the Czech religious figure, and presents reflections on how the proposal to support Jan Hus’s 500th jubilee aligns with the tradition of honoring cultural figures in the Russian Empire by the mid-19th century. The material draws from both published documents and sources not yet introduced into scholarly circulation. The motives behind honoring Jan Hus's legacy are seen in the acknowledgment by the chairman of the St. Petersburg branch of the committee, Gilferding, of the Orthodox foundations of the Czech reformer’s teachings, deeming it possible to use Hus celebrations as a lever of influence on Czech society and advance the idea of political and religious unity among all Slavic branches in Orthodox faith.

1. Arsenyev, K. K. (1868). Jan Huss and the Czech nationality. Bulletin of Europe, 5 (9): 360—382. (In Russ.).

2. Buchanov, I. I. (2010). The Hussite movement: domestic historiography (1945—2005). PhD Diss. Moscow. 30 p. (In Russ.).

3. Budilovich, A. S. (1870). Was Jerome of Prague an Orthodox man? Christian reading, 4: 684—708. (In Russ.).

4. Čornej, P. (2008). Zrození husitského mýtu: problém optiky. In: 19. století v nás: modely, instituce a reprezentace, které přetrvaly. Praha: Hist. úst. 86—103. ISBN 978-80-7286-139-2. (In Czech).

5. Egorova, K. B. (2023). Elishka Krasnogorskaya — correspondent A. N. Pypina. In: Slavic world: community and diversity. Materials of the conference of young scientists within the framework of the Days of Slavic Writing and Culture tours. May 23—24, 2023. Moscow: Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 297—301. (In Russ.).

6. Galyamichev, A. N. (2021). Gusits and Russians. Saratov: Techno-Décor. 155 p. ISBN 978-5-907175-74-7. (In Russ.).

7. Galyamichev, A. N. (2021). The Hussite movement: publications of sources and literature in Russian. Saratov: Techno-Décor. 63 p. ISBN 978-5-907175-61-7. (In Russ.).

8. Gimadeev, T. V. (2019). Response to the Slavophile concept of the Hussite movement in Czech historiography and journalism (before 1918). Slavic Almanac, 1—2: 46—58. DOI: 10.31168/2073-5731.2019.1-2.1.03. (In Russ.).

9. Graus, F. (1975). Lebendige Vergangenheit. Überlieferung im Mittelalter und in den Vorstellungen vom Mittelalter. Vienna–Köln: Böhlau. 421 p. ISBN 341-21-187-53-2. (In Germ.).

10. Kotov, V. V. (2019). Jan Hus, Hussites and “Falcons”: instrumentalization of the events of the XV century by Czech nationalists and echoes of their actions in the Russian Empire (1862—1916). Vox medii aevi, 2 (5): 102—126. (In Russ.).

11. Lapteva, L. P. (2005). History of Slavic studies in Russia in the XIX century. Moscow: Indrik. 847 p. ISBN 5-85759-335-2. (In Russ.).

12. Lapteva, L. P. (2015). Jan Hus in the coverage of Russian historiography of the centuries. In: Slavs and Russia: historical context and problems of historiography. Moscow: Institute of Slavic Studies. 8—18. (In Russ.).

13. Lapteva, L. P. (2008). Response of the St. Petersburg department of the Slavic Charitable Committee on the 500th anniversary of the birth of Jan Huss in 1869. In: Slavic forums and problems of Slavic studies. Moscow-Stavropol: [b. i.]. 106—113. (In Russ.).

14. Lapteva, L. P. (1978). Russian historiography of the Hussite movement (40s of the XIX century — 1917). Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow State University. 340 p. (In Russ.).

15. Levitt, M. (1994). Literature and politics: Pushkin’s Holiday of 1880. St. Petersburg: Academic Project. 262 p. ISBN 5-7331-0024-9. (In Russ.).

16. Morée, P. (2015). Inventing Rituals to Commemorate Jan Hus Between 1865 and 1965. Filosofický časopis, 10: 371—387.

17. Orlov, V. N. (1941). Satirical poetry of the early 1800s. In: History of Russian literature: in 10 volumes: Tom V. Literature of the first half of the 19th century: Part. 1. Moscow; Leningrad: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Pp. 227-234. (In Russ.).

18. Pokorný, J. (2015). Kult Jana Husa v rámci české národní agitace let 1868—1918. In: Praha Husova a husitská 1415—2015: publikace k výstavě: Clam-Gallasův palác, 25. září 2015—24. ledna 2016. Praha: Sondy. 221—230. ISBN 978-80-68846-60-6.

19. Šmahel, F. (2011). “Old Czechs Were Hefty Heroes”: the Construction and Reconstruction of Czech National History in its Relationship to the “Great” Medieval Past. In: The Uses of the Middle Ages in Modern European States. History, Nationhood and the Search for Origins. New York: [b. i.]. 249—253.