Artistic Peculiarities of Mikhail Volkov’s Collection “Tales of Antrop from Fox Hills”
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-6-266-286
Abstract
This article analyzes the Mikhail Volkov’s collection “Tales of Antrop from Fox Hills”, which was repeatedly republished in the late 1920s. It notes the characteristic trend of cyclicality in the first decade after the October Revolution: uniting novellas into books and collections. The study is based on the 1926 editions and the reprints of 1927, reflecting a change in the author’s concept: a semantic and thematic reorientation. The research aims to identify the artistic specificity of M. Volkov’s book, with tasks including understanding the functional role of the title and preface of the collection as parts of the header-final complex, characterizing the image of the fictional author-narrator, and exploring the genre features of the book. It is established, firstly, that while in the first edition, the narrator’s figure, his narrative style, and storytelling method were significant, in reprints, the narrated world becomes more important. Secondly, the fictional author-narrator, Grandpa Antrop, describes the humorous world of the village slowly changing and restructuring in the first post-revolutionary decade through a storytelling manner in a series of “tales.” Thirdly, in terms of genre, the novellas in the collection tend towards anecdote. It is shown that at the core of the paradoxically developing, comedic plot is the storyteller himself, presenting all stories as a life “fact” presented in a playful form.
About the Author
O. Yu. OsmukhinaRussian Federation
Olga Yu. Osmukhina - Doctor of Philology, Professor, Head of the Department of Russian and Foreign Literature
Scopus Author ID: 57197735209
WoS ResearcherID: P-3379-2017
Saransk
References
1. Ageeva, Yu. P. (2014). Poetics of prosaic microcycles in Russian minor prose of the 20s of the XX century. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Yekaterinburg. 21 p. (In Russ.).
2. Dolzhenko, L. V. (1984). Literary and aesthetic principles and creative practice of the “Forge” (based on the material of fiction). PhD Diss. Moscow. 186 p. (In Russ.).
3. Ershov, L. F. (1977). Satirical genres of Russian Soviet literature (from epigrams to novels). Leningrad: Nauka. 282 p. (In Russ.).
4. Kleinbort, L. M. (1924). M. Volkov. In: Essays of folk literature (1880—1923). Belletrists. Facts, observations, characteristics. Leningrad: Sower. 195—202. (In Russ.).
5. Kogan, P. S. (1927). Literature of the great decade. Moscow, Leningrad: Moskovsky Rabochy. 160 p. (In Russ.).
6. Kudrina, M. V. (2003). Genre structure of the story. PhD Diss. Moscow. 291 p. (In Russ.).
7. Kurganov, E. (1997). Anecdote as a genre. St. Petersburg: Academic Project. 122 p. ISBN 5-7331-0084-2. (In Russ.).
8. Leiderman, N. L. (2005). “A simple Soviet man” in the mirror of the story (“The Monumental story” by M. Sholokhov and “The Small Epic” by A. Solzhenitsyn). In: On a par with the century. Russian literary Classics in the Soviet Era: Monographic essays. St. Petersburg: Zlatoust. 192—215. ISBN 5-86547-379-4. (In Russ.).
9. Leiderman, N. L. (1991). Between Chaos and Space (a story in the context of time). Novy Mir, 7: 240—257. (In Russ.).
10. Osmukhina, O. Y. (2013). The author’s mask in the proletarian context (“Tales of Antrop from the Fox Mountains” by M. Volkov). Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University of Technology and Design. Series 2. Art history. Philological sciences, 2: 75—79. (In Russ.).
11. Osmukhina, O. Y. (2015). The author’s mask of the grandfather of Antrop in the novelistics of M. Volkov. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N. I. Lobachevsky, 4: 243—247. (In Russ.).
12. Osmukhina, O. Y. (2009). Traditions of the author’s mask in Russian satirical prose of the 1920s (based on the material of M. Zoshchenko and M. Volkov). Bulletin of Tomsk University, 323: 41—49. (In Russ.).
13. Pakentrager, S. (1930). An order for inspiration. Articles about literature. Moscow: Federation. 226 p. (In Russ.).
14. Pchelintsev, I. (1924). Mikhail Volkov. Literary portrait. Rabochy zhurnal, 3—4: 211—213. (In Russ.).
15. Polonsky, V. P. (1988). About literature. Moscow: Soviet writer. 496 p. (In Russ.).
16. Polyakova, L. V. (1973). “The Forge” in the literary movement of 1920—1932. PhD Diss. Moscow. 200 p. (In Russ.).
17. Ponomareva, E. V. (2006). Russian novelistics of the 1920s. Doct. Diss. Yekaterinburg. 639 p. (In Russ.).
18. Vladimirsky, V. (1966). The past years. [From the memoirs of the writers who were part of the lit. the Forge Association]. Our contemporary, 4: 85—89. (In Russ.).
19. Vladislavlev, I. V. (1928). Literature of the great decade, 1. Moscow; Leningrad: State Publishing House. 300 p. (In Russ.).
20. Yakubovsky, G. V. (1929). The writers of the “Forge”: articles. Moscow: Federation. 226 p. (In Russ.).
21. Zvyagina, M. Y. (2002). Transformation of genres in Russian prose of the late twentieth century. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. Moscow. 42 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Osmukhina O.Yu. Artistic Peculiarities of Mikhail Volkov’s Collection “Tales of Antrop from Fox Hills”. Nauchnyi dialog. 2024;13(6):266-286. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-6-266-286