Rapacki Plan: Policy of Small States in Central and Eastern Europe in Second Half of 1950s
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-6-305-321
Abstract
This article addresses the role of small states in addressing security issues in Central Europe. Through an examination of the development of the Rapacki Plan, the authors trace the distinctive features of the national interests of small states in both Western and Eastern Europe. These interests were oriented towards the advancement of European integration, the resolution of the German question, and the mitigation of political and economic dependence on the USSR. Special attention is given to the Federal Republic of Germany’s (FRG) membership in NATO and the roles played by the United States, the United Kingdom, and other alliance members in attempts to address European security issues at the level of small states. Although the Rapacki Plan was never fully realized, its objectives were partially achieved. First, the arming of the FRG with American nuclear weapons and the deployment of American intermediate-range missiles on its territory were prevented; second, economic cooperation expanded, initiating the erosion of the “Iron Curtain”; third, a “universal idea of nuclear-free zones” emerged; and fourth, concrete steps were taken to prevent nuclear war.
About the Authors
V. N. BaryshnikovRussian Federation
Vladimir N. Baryshnikov - Doctor of History, Professor, Department of History of Modern and Contemporary Times
St. Petersburg
A. V. Smolin
Russian Federation
Anatoly V. Smolin - Doctor of History, Professor, Department of History of Modern and Contemporary Times
St. Petersburg
V. N. Chepik
Russian Federation
Victor N. Chepik -PhD of History, Senior Lecturer, Department of History of Modern and Contemporary Times
St. Petersburg
References
1. Albrecht, U., Vale, M. The Political Background of the Rapacki Plan of 1957 and Its Current Significance. (1983). International Journal of Politics, 13 (1/2): 117—133.
2. Deutsch, K. W. (1966). Integration and Arms Control in the European Political Environment: A Summary Report. The American Political Science Review, 60 (2): 354—365.
3. Dzelepi, E. (1959). Atomless Europe. The truth about Rapatsky’s plan. Moscow: Foreign literature. 126 p. (In Russ.).
4. Grimsson, O. R. (1985). Nuclear Allergy. Nordic nuclear-free options. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. June/July. 23—28.
5. Karin, A. D. (2022). The position of the GDR according to the Rapatsky plan. Questions of history and archeology, 2: 26—28. (In Russ.).
6. Kourkouvelas, L. (2012). Denuclearization on NATO’s Southern Front. Allied Reactions to Soviet Proposals, 1957—1963. Journal of Cold War Studies, 4 (4): 197—215.
7. Krige, J. (2016). Sharing Knowledge, Shaping Europe: US Technological Collaboration and Nonproliferation. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 227 р. ISBN 9780262336406.
8. Margins forMuschik, A. (2006). Headed Towards the West: Swedish Neutrality and the German Question, 1949—1972. Contemporary European History, 15 (4): 519—538.
9. Manoeuvre in Cold War Europe. The Influence of Smaller Powers. (2020). New York: Routledge. 623 p. ISBN 9780429425592.
10. Muschik, A. (2006). Headed Towards the West: Swedish Neutrality and the German Question, 1949—1972. Contemporary European History, 15 (4): 519—538.
11. Nezhinsky, L. N. (1995). Soviet foreign policy during the Cold War (1945—1985). A new reading. Moscow: International Relations. 237 p. (In Russ.).
12. Rapacki, A. (1963). The Polish Plan for a Nuclear-Free Zone Today. International Affairs, 39 (1): 1—12.
13. Schmidt, G. (1994). Divided Europe-Divided Germany (1950—63). Contemporary European History, 3 (2): 155—192.
14. Staar, R. F. (1958). New Course in Communist Poland. The Journal of Politics, 20 (1): 64—88.
15. Zoltán, M. (2008). Denuclearization in Central Europe? The Rapacki Plan during the Cold War. Budapest: Öt kontinens. Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem. 225—264
Review
For citations:
Baryshnikov V.N., Smolin A.V., Chepik V.N. Rapacki Plan: Policy of Small States in Central and Eastern Europe in Second Half of 1950s. Nauchnyi dialog. 2024;13(6):305-321. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-6-305-321