Justices of Peace in Russian Empire as an Alternative to Formal Judicial Proceedings: 1775–1866
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-10-445-462
Abstract
This article examines the establishment and functioning of the Justices of the Peace in the Russian Empire, initiated by Catherine II in 1775 and fully abolished in 1866. Utilizing a structural analysis method, the study investigates the judicial processes within these courts from 1775 to 1866. A formal-logical approach is employed to analyze the existing legislation of the Russian Empire concerning the jurisdiction of the Justices of the Peace. The research draws on administrative documents from the State Archive of Voronezh Oblast and legislative acts from the late 18th to mid-19th centuries. The novelty of this study lies in its perspective of viewing the Justices of the Peace as an alternative to formal judicial proceedings, which were primarily based on inquisitorial principles as an ideal type of legal process, alongside theories of formal evidence, where judicial decisions were made without regard for the internal convictions of the judge. The author concludes that the judicial process of the Justices of the Peace was primarily aimed at protecting private interests, with the nature of this alternative to formal proceedings varying depending on whether the case was criminal or civil.
About the Author
S. N. Podlesnykh
Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies named after G. F. Morozov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey N. Podlesnykh, PhD in Legal Sciences, Department of Social and Humanities Sciences
Voronezh
References
1. Baranov, Yu. V. (2019). Composition and record keeping of the Moscow Conscience Court. Colloquium-Journal, 13—12 (37): 30—31. (In Russ.).
2. Barats, G. M. (1893). An essay on the origin and then gradual abolition of conscientious courts and courts of conscience in Russia: A historical and legal study. St. Petersburg: [b. i.]. 40 p. (In Russ.).
3. Carnino, C. (2009). Rereading Franco Venturi’s Eighteenth century: Absolutist monarchy between reform and revolt. History of European Ideas, 35 (1): 11—23. DOI: 10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2008.07.004.
4. Efremova, I. S. (2019). “Witch hunt” in the Kursk viceroyalty in the XVIII century (based on the materials of the City magistrate and the conscience court). Scientific notes. Electronic scientific journal of Kursk State University, 1 (49): 1—5. (In Russ.).
5. Efremova, N. N. (2022). Transformation of the judicial system of Russia in the XVIII — early XX centuries: A textbook for students, postgraduates and teachers of law faculties and universities. Moscow: Moscow city. ped. University. 176 p. ISBN 978-5-243-00704-7. (In Russ.).
6. Ehrlich, I. (1982). The optimum enforcement of laws and the concept of justice: A positive analysis. International Review of Law and Economics, 2 (1): 3—27. DOI: 10.1016/0144-8188(82)90011-4.
7. Foynitsky, I. Ya. (1912). Course of criminal proceedings, 1. St. Petersburg: Typogr. Tov. “Public benefit”. 578 p. (In Russ.).
8. Gradovsky, A. D. (1883). The beginning of Russian state law, III. St. Petersburg: M. M. Stasyulevich’s Type. 384 p. (In Russ.).
9. Hart, H. L. A. (1983). Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals. In: Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. New York: [b. i.]. 75—77.
10. Ilyukhina, V. A., Agafonov, S. Yu. (2024). Institute of the Conscience court in the Russian Empire (1775—1852). Historical and legal problems: a new perspective, 1: 23—32. DOI: 10.24412/2309-152-2024-1-23-32. (In Russ.).
11. Khashchina, E. E. (2015). Features of the formation and principles of the investigative type of judicial process: theoretical and legal aspect. Actual problems of Russian law, 10 (59): 20—27. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2015.59.10.020-027. (In Russ.).
12. Klyuchevsky, V. O. (2001). Russian history. In five volumes, 3. Moscow: Ripoll Classic. 704 p. (In Russ.).
13. Kuznetsova, E. A. (2023). Witchcraft, deception or a harmless joke: a dialogue about magical practices in investigative cases of conscientious courts of the first half of the XIX century. Folklore: structure, typology, semiotics, 6 (1): 10—73. DOI: 10.28995/2658-5294-2023-6-1-10-73. (In Russ.).
14. Lonskaya, S. V. (2009). World justice of Imperial Russia: ideas and analogues (XVIII — the first half of the XIX century). Bulletin of the I. Kant Russian State University, 9: 25—33. (In Russ.).
15. Mironov, B. N. (2023). The Russian Empire: from tradition to modernity: in three volumes, 3. St. Petersburg: Dmitry Bulanin. 992 p. ISBN 978-5-86007-996-0. (In Russ.).
16. Mkhitaryan, L. Yu. (2014). The activity of conscience courts in prerevolutionary Russia (on the example of the Perm province). Bulletin of the Perm University. Legal sciences, 1 (23): 37—43. (In Russ.).
17. Naumov, I. M. (1830). My thoughts on the conscientious court and gratitude to the memory of the Most Holy. Metropolitan Ambrose. St. Petersburg: Tip. Gl. upr. ways of communication. 22 p. (In Russ.).
18. Ostapchuk, K. S. (2017). The role of natural law in the development of the theory of judicial decision. Theory and practice of social development, 10: 65—69. DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2017.10.14. (In Russ.).
19. Raz, J. (1980). The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System 2nd ed. New York: [b. i.]. 245 p.
20. Razumov, E. V. (2014). Formation of the system of conscientious courts in the Russian Empire. Bulletin of the Chuvash University, 3: 286—288. (In Russ.).
21. Samsonov, A. A. (2015). Novgorod Conscience Court. History of the state and law, 6: 42—47. (In Russ.).
22. Silvestrini, G. (2010). Rousseau, Pufendorf and the eighteenth-century natural law tradition. History of European Ideas, 36 (3): 280—301. DOI: 10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2010.02.003.
23. Tomsinov, V. A. (2016). The judicial system of the Russian Empire in the XVIII — first half of the XIX century (based on the materials of legislative acts). The first article. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Episode 11: Law, 3: 3—24. (In Russ.).
24. Tur, V. G. (2023). The establishment and significance of conscientious courts in the Russian Empire. In: Issues of state and law development: theory, history and practice: Collection of scientific papers. articles based on the materials of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference (on the 100th anniversary of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation), Simferopol, November 09, 2022. Simferopol: LLC Publishing House Printing House “Arial”. 191—196. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Podlesnykh S.N. Justices of Peace in Russian Empire as an Alternative to Formal Judicial Proceedings: 1775–1866. Nauchnyi dialog. 2024;13(10):445-462. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-10-445-462
Views:
586
Email this article 