Mongolia and 14th Dalai Lama in Late 20th and 21st Centuries
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-10-481-496
Abstract
This study explores the role of the Dalai Lama institution in the political processes of Mongolia, both from a historical perspective and in the context of contemporary events. The aim of the article is to identify the key factors influencing the presence of the Dalai Lama in Mongolia’s socio-political life. Conceptually and methodologically, the research relies on the theory of post-secular society. The sources for this study include legal documents from Mongolia, data from national censuses, results from sociological surveys, and publications from Mongolian, Russian, and Western media that address the relationships between state, society, and religion. The authors argue that modern Mongolia exemplifies a post-secular society. It is noted that the abandonment of state atheism and the phenomenon of “Buddhist revival” have led to a significant intertwining of religious and secular institutions. The figure of the 14th Dalai Lama is regarded as a crucial participant in these processes. The study establishes that the main factors contributing to the involvement of the Dalai Lama in Mongolia’s socio-political processes include his high religious authority among believers, the legitimization of Mongolian reincarnations, and his image as a “democratic leader.” Factors that restrain the influence of the Dalai Lama include a significant segment of non-religious citizens in Mongolia, risks of deteriorating relations with the People’s Republic of China, and trends toward the nationalization of Mongolia’s Buddhist sangha.
Supporting agencies: The study is supported by Russian Science Foundation, project number 24-48-03022, project “Traditional Buddhism, Postsecularity, and Contemporary Socio-Political Processes in Russia and Mongolia”, https://rscf.ru/project/24-48-03022/
About the Authors
V. A. Rodionov
Banzarov Buryat State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir A. Rodionov, Doctor of Political, Associate Professor, Director of the Institute of Oriental Studies
Ulan-Ude
O. Khatanbold
Institute of Philosophy of Mongolian Academy of Sciences
Mongolia
Mongolia
Oidov Khatanbold, Doctor of Political, Head of the Department of Political Science and Law, leading research scientist
Ulaanbaatar
References
1. Abayeva, L. L. (2021). Asian Buddhist Conference for Peace in the history of diplomatic relations between the Buddhist clergy of Russia (Buryatia) and Mongolia. In: Russia and Mongolia in the XX—XXI centuries: to the 100th anniversary of the Mongolian Revolution and the establishment of diplomatic relations. collection of scientific articles. Novosibirsk: SB RAS. 50—52. (In Russ.).
2. Aryaabat, C. (2015). A new danger for Buddhism in Mongolia. Savetibet.ru. 27.11. Available at: http://savetibet.ru/2015/11/27/mongolia.html (accessed 12.08.2024). (In Russ.).
3. Battulga, H. (2017). I am not anti-China. But.… In: iToim.mn. 10.08. Available at: http://itoim.mn/index.php/site/news/10541 (accessed 12.08.2024). (In Mong.).
4. Davaanyam, T. (2011). The revival of Mongolian Buddhism. In: News.mn. 09.04. Available at: https://news.mn/r/556456 (accessed 12.08.2024). (In Mong.).
5. Dierkes, J. (2016). Bullied by China over Visit by the Dalai Lama. Blogs.ubc.ca. 21.12. Available at: [http://blogs.ubc.ca/mongolia/2016/hhdl-visits-china-pouts-bullies/ (accessed 12.08.2024).
6. Dogmiichoydon, Sh. (2003). China and the Dalai Lama’s talks. International Studies, 4: 98— 102. DOI: 10.5564/jis.v4i4.2413.
7. Elverskog, J. (2006). Two Buddhisms in Contemporary Mongolia. Contemporary Buddhism, 7 (1): 29—46. DOI: 10.1080/14639940600877937.
8. Enkhbat, Ts. (2016). Mongolia is not America, but Central Asia. Elbegdorj is not Trump. Asiarussia.ru. 20.12. Available at: http://asiarussia.ru/blogs/14636/ (accessed 12.08.2024). (In Russ.).
9. Kuzmin, S. L. (2011). The Treaty of 1913 between Mongolia and Tibet: new data. Vostok. Afro-Asian societies: History and modernity, 4: 122—128. (In Russ.).
10. Molor-Erdene, S. (2016). Dalai Lama as the main producer of “opium” for the Mongols. Molorerdene.academy. 27.11. Available at: http://molorerdene.academy/25/nitem (accessed 08/12/2024). (In Russ.).
11. Munh-Orgil, Ts. (2016). The Chinese side canceled all visits. Mongolia today. 24.11. P. 5. (In Russ.).
12. Natsagdorj, D. (2015). This is a plot by foreign friends to divide Mongolian lamas and seek political gain. In: Dnn.mn. 16.02. Available at: https://dnn.mn/д-нацагдоржэнэ-бол-гадны-нөхдүүд-монголын-лам-нарыг-талцуулж-улс-төрийн-ашигхонжоо-хайх-гэсэн-явуулга/ (accessed 12.08.2024). (In Mong.).
13. Ostrovskaya, E. A. (2009). Will the Russian benefit of the Dalai Lama XIV take place? Bulletin of Analytics, 3: 67—74. (In Russ.).
14. Pomelova, Yu. P. (2019). The religious policy of the People’s Republic of China to control the process of reincarnation in Tibetan Buddhism during the presidency of Hu Jintao. Society: philosophy, history, culture, 2: 53—57. DOI: 10.24158/fik.2019.2.11. (In Russ.).
15. Radchenko, S. (2016). How Do You Stand up to China? Ask Mongolia. Chinafile.com. 02.12. Available at: http://www.chinafile.com/features/how-do-you-stand-china-ask-mongolia (accessed 12.08.2024).
16. Rodionov, V. A. (2013). Democratization of Mongolia: external factors. Olon uls sudlal (Ulaanbaatar), 3: 22—30. (In Russ.).
17. Rodionov, V. A. (2023). “Soft power” of Mongolia during the period of socialism. Power, 5: 245—250. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v31i5.9825. (In Russ.).
18. Sabirov, R. (2022). Between Dharmasala and the Golden Urn: Mongolian Buddhism in the context of religious policy of the People’s Republic of China. State, religion, Church in Russia and abroad, 40 (2): 105—127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2022-40-2-105-127. (In Russ.).
19. Sabirov, R. T. (2012). Where is the “center” of Tibetan Buddhism in the modern world? In: Tsyrendorjiev Readings — 2012 (V): Tibetan civilization and the nomadic peoples of Eurasia: cross-cultural contacts. Kiev: Polygraphist. 470—486. (In Russ.).
20. Sanjdorj, Z. (2016). The Dalai Lama is participating in our country’s internal affairs. In: Dnn. mn. 17.11. Available at: https://dnn.mn/з-санждорж-далай-лам-манай-улсындотоод-хэрэгт-оролцож-байна/ (accessed 12.08.2024). (In Mong.).
21. Serjav, B. (2019). The role of the peace envoys of the Mongolian People’s Republic in the development of bilateral relations. In: The role of public diplomacy in post-war Mongolian-Japanese relations: past, present, future. Ulaanbaatar: Mongolian Japanese Studies Association. 5—23. (In Mong.).
22. Skrynnikova, T. D. (1988). The Lamaist Church and the state. Outer Mongolia of the XVI — early XX century. Novosibirsk: Nauka. 104 p. (In Russ.).
23. Tsedendamba, S. (2017). Post-Soviet society and Buddhist society: social and religious processes in Russia and Mongolia. Ulaanbaatar: Institute of Philosophy of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences. 32 p. (In Mong.).
24. Uzlaner, D. (2019). Religion and politics: an inseparable symbiosis? Russia in global politics, 1: 10—23. (In Russ.).
25. Vanchikova, Tsp., Ayushieva, I. G. (2018). The religious factor in modern Sino-Mongolian relations. Bulletin of ZabGU, 2: 59—65. DOI: 10.21209/2227924520182425965. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Rodionov V.A., Khatanbold O. Mongolia and 14th Dalai Lama in Late 20th and 21st Centuries. Nauchnyi dialog. 2024;13(10):481-496. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-10-481-496
Views:
629
Email this article 