Verbal Representation of Cultural-Historical Memory in Graffiti Discourse
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-1-157-175
Abstract
This article explores various methods of verbal representation of cultural-historical memory within graffiti discourse. Street art objects are presented as a sociocultural discursive formation that conveys specific national concepts, spiritual and moral guidelines, and ethical principles. The aim of this study is to examine the types of precedent phenomena utilized by graffiti writers and to propose a classification of the corresponding verbal street art objects based on the findings. The material analyzed comprises over 200 graffiti pieces featuring diverse intertextual inclusions. The minimal structural-semantic unit of a precedent phenomenon is identified as the intertexteme — linguistic means that realize intertextual connections within specific textual contexts. The authors conclude that intertextemes based on historical and cultural material of varying quality serve to reveal the communicative-pragmatic intentions and worldview objectives of graffiti writers. By infusing urban spaces with unique meanings, graphic street art objects not only highlight pressing socio-economic issues but also contain philosophical reflections and include content that facilitates the effective transmission and preservation of the national cultural-historical code.
About the Authors
D. Yu. ShalkovRussian Federation
Denis Yu. Shalkov - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor at the Department of Documentation and Language Communication.
Rostov-on-Don
S. V. Bylkova
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Bylkova - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Acting Head of the Department of Documentation and Language Communication.
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Pechorina, D. The return of the prodigal parrot — the story of an egoist. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20100110061438/http://www.nashfilm.ru/multfilms/1114.html (accessed 22.10.2024). (In Russ.).
2. Belkin, A. I. (2019). The specifics of the mentality of postmodern graffiti in the context of graffiti formations. In: Artistic paradigms in the era of social turbulence: proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Forum: in 2 volumes, 2. Samara: Sama-ra State Institute of Culture: Consent. 547—580. ISBN 978-5-907038-36-3. (In Russ.).
3. Bezrukov, A. N. (2015). Reception of a literary text: a functional approach: a monograph. Wroclaw: Russian-Polish Institute Foundation. 300 p. ISBN 978-83-935729-3-9. (In Russ.).
4. Biryukova, N. S. (2005). On the types of precedent phenomena. Proceedings of the Ural State Pedagogical University: Linguistics, 5: 60—66. (In Russ.).
5. Bylkova, S. V., Chubova, E. P. (2023). Communication skills of students as a factor of successful socialization in the professional sphere. Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology, 6 (4): 109—118. DOI: 10.23947/2658-7165-2023-6-4-109-118. (In Russ.).
6. Bylkova, S. V., Kudryashov, I. A. (2017). Dialogic communication as a sphere of interaction of discursive and grammatical factors. Social Sciences, 6: 167—178. (In Russ.).
7. Chernyak, V. D., Lee, H. (2020). “Baba Yaga vs”: precedent phenomena from cartoons in political discourse. Political Linguistics, 4 (82): 68—76. DOI: 10.26170/pl20-04-08. (In Russ.).
8. Efremov, V. A. (2021). Cultural memory and precedent phenomena: the case of F. M. Dostoevsky. The World of the Russian Word, 4: 65—72. DOI: 10.24412/1811-1629-2021-4-65-72. (In Russ.).
9. Guto, E. (2014). The language and graphics of student graffiti. Doct. Diss. Zadar. 222 p. (In Russ.).
10. Karaulov, Yu. N. (2010). Russian language and linguistic personality. Moscow: LKI Publishing House. 264 p. ISBN 978-5-382-01071-7. (In Russ.).
11. Khuzin, I. R., Gilfanova, G. T., Salimzanova, D. A., Vildanova, E. M. (2020). Precedent texts as linguistic and cultural components of communication. Global scientific potential, 1 (106): 104—107. (In Russ.).
12. Kolmakova, V. V., Shalkov, D. Y. (2021). Psychohermeneutics of graffiti: External and internal loci of control. E3S Web of Conferences: 14th International Scientific and Practical Conference on State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness, INTERAGROMASH, 273: P. 11021. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202127311021.
13. Nakhimova, E. A. (2018). On classification and differentiation of precedent phenomena in political communication. Political Linguistics, 1 (67): 41—46. DOI: 10.26170/pl18-01-04. (In Russ.).
14. Nazarova, R. Z., Zolotarev, M. V. (2015). Precedent phenomena: problems of definition and classification of precedent phenomena. Proceedings of the Saratov University. A new series. Series: Philology. Journalism, 15 (2): 17—23. (In Russ.).
15. Nekita, A. G., Malenko, S. A. (2024). Serving the Nostalgia Industries: The Mythology of the Soviet Cheburashka in the Labyrinths of Consumer Hopelessness. Impression Indus-tries. Technologies of Sociocultural Research, 2 (7): 86—126. DOI 10.34680/EISCRT-2024-2(7)-86-126.
16. Novik, A. L. (2020). Graffiti as an art phenomenon in Belarus at the end of the XX—XXI century. Art and Culture, 2 (38): 5—11. (In Russ.).
17. Porozov, R. Y. (2020). Youth as a subject of vandal activity in the subculture of graffiti. Political linguistics, 6 (84): 150—155. DOI: 10.26170/p120-06-16. (In Russ.).
18. Posidelova, V. V., Shalkov, D. Y. (2023). Sociolinguistic markers of destructive speech behavior in graffiti communication. Bulletin of the Ufa Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 3 (101): 158—163. (In Russ.).
19. Rudenkin, D. V., Lugin, D. A. (2023). Representation of the graffiti theme in urban virtual communities: results of content analysis. Theory and practice of social development, 11: 108—113. DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2023.11.11. (In Russ.).
20. Schwindt, U. S. (2019). Street art as a way of building a dialogue with the residents of the city (on the example of 4 administrative districts of Yekaterinburg). The world of science. Sociology, philology, cultural studies, 10 (2): 13—19. (In Russ.).
21. Starukha Shapoklyak. Available at: http://mar4586.narod.ru/trickster/shapoklyak.html (accessed 22.01.2025). (In Russ.).
22. Vorobyova, I. V., Kruzhkova, O. V. (ed.). (2021). The cultural code of vandalism: the experience of cross-cultural research: a monograph. Yekaterinburg: Publishing House of the Ural State Pedagogical University. 308 p. ISBN 978-5-7186-1870-9. (In Russ.).
23. Yaylenko, V. P. (2018). Historiography and methods of working with ancient Greek graffiti. Materials on the archeology and history of the ancient and medieval Black Sea region, 10: 479—515. DOI: 10.24411/2219-8857-2018-00021. (In Russ.).
24. Zadorojnyi, A. V. (2011). Transcripts of dissent? Political graffiti and elite ideology under the Principate. In: Ancient Graffiti in Context. United Kingdom: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 110—133. DOI: 10.4324/9780203840870-13.
Review
For citations:
Shalkov D.Yu., Bylkova S.V. Verbal Representation of Cultural-Historical Memory in Graffiti Discourse. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(1):157-175. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-1-157-175