Urban Narrative of D. Bavilsky: An Interpretation of Chelyabinsk Text
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-1-304-322
Abstract
This article examines the distinctive features of urban narrative construction in the works of Chelyabinsk writer Dmitry Bavilsky. The primary objective of this study is to identify specific interpretative variations of urban text within the framework of the cycle “Noun.” The methodological foundation of the research is grounded in the principles of narratology, approaches from geopoetics, and the concepts of mental cartography, which allow for the delineation of a unique vision of the cityscape. It is demonstrated that the urban narrative in D. Bavilsky’s cycle “Noun” emphasizes a particular chronotope of the city, described through the lens of its periphery: Cherdachinsk (a name resonant with Chelyabinsk) exists at the boundary of a specific geographical locus while simultaneously straddling different worlds. The authors highlight that the city in Bavilsky’s works is intricately linked to the image of a protagonist striving to comprehend their own “self” through spatial perception, articulating a state of “non-belonging,” and filling it with subjective value characteristics. It is noted that a leading technique in Bavilsky’s text construction is antithesis. The analysis of the material allows for an enrichment of the traditions surrounding the study of Chelyabinsk text and Bavilsky’s oeuvre, characterizing a high level of reflection on the image of the city in the writer’s work.
Keywords
urban narrative,
urban text,
image of the urban periphery,
space of the city,
mental cartography,
Dmitry Bavilsky
Supporting agencies: The study is supported by Russian Science Foundation, project number № 24-28-20286, “The Image of Chelyabinsk in the Narratives of Artists: Digital Tools for Reading the Urban Text”
About the Authors
N. N. Shlemova
South Ural State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia N. Shlemova - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Russian Language and Literature.
Chelyabinsk
E. V. Kanishcheva
South Ural State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena V. Kanishcheva - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Russian Language and Literature.
Chelyabinsk
References
1. Bavilsky, D. (2013). Noun. In: The impossibility of travel. Moscow: New Literary Review. 135—230. (In Russ.).
2. Dmitry Bavilsky: about the harsh Urals, unscrupulous Muscovites and the peak of the world. (2017). Arguments and Facts. August 14. Available at: https://news.rambler.ru/other/37643684-dmitriy-bavilskiy-o-surovyh-uraltsah-besprintsipnyh-moskvichah-i-pike-mira/ (accessed 01.11.2024). (In Russ.).
3. Abashev, V. V. (2012). Russian literature of the Urals. Problems of geopoetics: studies. Manual. Perm: Perm State National University. issl. Univ. 140 p. ISBN 978-5-7944-1920-7. (In Russ.).
4. Alexandrova-Osokina, O. N. (20200. Issues of Geopoetics in Modern Literary Criticism. Nauchnyi dialog, 5: 216—241. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-5-216-241 (In Russ.).
5. Avanesov, S. S. (2016). Visual semiotics of the city: a perspective for the study of urban texts. ΠΡΑΞΗMA. Problems of visual semiotics (ΠΡΑΞΗMA. Journal of Visual Semiotics), 4 (10): 9—22. (In Russ.).
6. Bakar, Ya. Ya. (2023). Everyday life as a trauma in D. Bavilsky’s novel “Potato Eaters”. In: The World of the Word the word in the world: a collection of scientific articles. Grodno: Yursaprint. 106—111. ISBN 978-985-7257-75-1. (In Russ.).
7. Banakh, I. (2021). Collective versus autobiographical memory in Dmitry Bavilsky’s book “The Museum of Water the Venetian Diary of the Twitter era”. Wielkie tematy kultury w literaturach słowiańskich, 173: 137—146. DOI: 10.19195/0137-1150.173.10. (In Polish.).
8. Borisenkova, A. (2010). Narrative turn and its problems. New Literary Review, 3. Available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/nlo/2010/3/narrativnyj-povorot-i-ego-problemy.html (accessed 11.01.2024). (In Russ.).
9. Chernovskaya, A. V. (2022). The Chelyabinsk text in D. Bavilsky’s novel “The Red Dot”. In: Science of the XXI century: problems, searches, solutions: proceedings of the XLVI scientific and practical conference. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State University. 295—298. ISBN 978-5-7271-1859-7. (In Russ.).
10. Kreiswirth, M. (1992). Trusting the Tale: the Narrativist Turn in the Human Sciences. New Literary History, 23 (3): 629—657. DOI: 10.2307/469223.
11. Ladokhina, O. F. (2021). Toponymics of Venice in the works of Katya Margolis and Dmitry Bavilsky. In: History and modernity of philological sciences: based on the materials of the International Scientific Conference XVI Vinogradov Readings (Moscow, March 5—6, 2020): collection of scientific articles: in 2 volumes, 2. Moscow: The Bookseller. 169—177. ISBN 978-5-9659-0224. (In Russ.).
12. Lynch, K. (1982). The image of the city. Moscow: Stroyizdat. 328 p. (In Russ.).
13. Mamonova, N. V. (2019). English-language borrowings in modern urban texts (on the example of Chelyabinsk). Bulletin of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, 3: 25—32. DOI: 10.17238/issn2227-6564-2019.3.25. (In Russ.).
14. Martina, L. (2019). Own logic of cities. New approaches in urban studies. Moscow: New Literary Review. 424 p. ISBN 978-5-4448-1167-2. (In Russ.).
15. Maslov, E. S. (2020). What is a narrative? Kazan: Kazan Publishing House. University. 116 p. ISBN 978-5-00130-302-2. (In Russ.).
16. Mednis, N. E. Supertexts in Russian literature. Available at: http://rassvet.websib.ru/chapter.htm?no=35 (accessed 22.08.2024). (In Russ.).
17. Medvedeva, A. R. (2023). The city as a cognitive expansion: a journey across Space in D. Bavilsky’s novel “The Red Dot”. In: Language and Culture. Chelyabinsk: South Ural State University. 31—35. (In Russ.).
18. Medvedeva, A. R. (2023). The interface of the city in the novel “The Red Dot” by D. Bavilsky. In: Media in the Modern world: a collection of materials from the 62nd International Scientific Forum. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University. 152—154. ISBN 978-5-00110-363-9. (In Russ.).
19. Medvedeva, A. R. (2023). The poetics of urban space through the prism of the theory of the atmosphere by G. Boehme (on the example of D. Bavilsky’s novel “The Red Dot”). Chelyabinsk Humanities, 2 (63): 46—51. DOI: 10.47475/1999-5407-2023-63-2-46-51. (In Russ.).
20. Musina, L. R. (2010). The image of the city in the mirror of artistic discourse (on the identification of the Chelyabinsk text). Lingua mobilis, 2 (21): 61—64. (In Russ.).
21. Reshetnikov, D. E. The place of media texts in the structure of the “urban text”. Sign: a problematic field of media education, 1 (3): 40—42. (In Russ.).
22. Riker, P. (2000). Time and story, 1. Moscow — St. Petersburg: TSGNII RAS; Cultural Initiative; University Book. 311 p. ISBN 5-7914-0042-X. (In Russ.).
23. Semyan, T. F., Smyshlyaev, E. A. (2015). Chelyabinsk poetry as part of the Ural poetic movement. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Linguistics, 12 (2): 28—32. (In Russ.).
24. Serto, M. (2010). Ghosts in the city. Untouchable reserve, 2 (70): 108—121. (In Russ.).
25. Shlemova, N. N., Ponomareva, E. V. (2024). Palimpsest as a principle of genre modeling in the books by E. Margolis “Venetian Notebooks” and “Footprints on the Water”. Siberian Philological Forum, 2 (27): 109—121. (In Russ.).
26. Sid, I. (2015). The history of the concept of “geopoetics”. Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 11 (722): 153—170. (In Russ.).
27. Silantyev, I. V., Sozina, E. K. (2013). Narrative in literature and history. Based on the diary prose of A. Herzen in the 1840s. Siberian Philological Journal, 3: 58—68. (In Russ.).
28. Simakova, S. I. (2009). Digital designations as an element of a newspaper text (on the example of the Chelyabinsk Worker). PhD Diss. Chelyabinsk. 184 p. (In Russ.).
29. Smyshlyaev, E. A. (2014). Chelyabinsk poetic text as a cultural model. Bulletin of TSPU, 11 (152): 115—118. (In Russ.).
30. Speshilova, E. I. (2024). Comprehension of the city: from perception to imagination. ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problems of visual semiotics, 2 (40): 103—119. DOI: 10.23951/2312-7899-2024-2-103-119. (In Russ.).
31. Stavtseva, E. M. (2016). The formation of the Chelyabinsk mythologeme in modern South Ural prose. Bulletin of the South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University, 8: 192—200. (In Russ.).
32. Stavtseva, E. M. (2017). Genre transformations in modern Chelyabinsk prose. PhD Diss. Yekaterinburg. 215 p. (In Russ.).
33. Tyupa, V. I. (2001). Narratology as an analyst of narrative discourse (“Bishop” by A. P. Chekhov). Tver: Tver State University. 58 p. (In Russ.).
34. Yakovlev, D. I. (2015). Chelyabinsk local encyclopedic text: an integral structure. In: Innovative development of regions in the context of globalization: proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Ivanovo: Ples Publ. 234—242. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Shlemova N.N., Kanishcheva E.V. Urban Narrative of D. Bavilsky: An Interpretation of Chelyabinsk Text. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(1):304-322. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-1-304-322
Views:
653
Email this article 