Theoretical Aspects of Linguistic Research on Category of Space within Toponymy: From Observer Perception to Agent Motor Skills
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-2-51-71
Abstract
This paper addresses the issue of insufficient integration of human spatial exploration motor skills in the study of geographical names. A constructivist approach to the formation of toponymy as a cognitive domain for navigation is advocated. The illustrative material consists of names from all types of topographical objects across six historical and ethnographic zones of Belarus. It is demonstrated that the declarative nature of attention to toponyms with spatial semantics, along with the complexity of defining the meanings of geographical names, stems from an underestimation of the subject’s movement within significant spaces. The fundamental role of grammar in elucidating the meanings of toponymy and their interconnectedness within the cognitive domain is highlighted. The author emphasizes the adaptive role of consciousness in navigation, its orientation towards transcending local figure-ground relationships of objects, and constructing a spatial semantic network. It is asserted that the constitutive factor in forming an everyday toposystem is the positioning of objects relative to reference points in space that are significant for local residents, rather than isolated, narrowly localized situations involving pairs of locally connected realities. The paper presents the specifics of implementing systems of spatial reference in toponymy, identifying reference points within the toposystem and units of a foundational model for navigation, while also demonstrating the role of analogy in transferring the structure of units to names that convey non-spatial meanings.
About the Author
A. I. Kopach
Minsk State Linguistic University
Belarus
Belarus
Aleh I. Kopach, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics
Minsk
References
1. Baksheeva, M. G., Islamova, Yu. V. (2021). The spatial model of top-bottom in the microtoponymy of the lower Irtysh region. Linguoculturology, 15: 20—29. (In Russ.).
2. Bedash, Yu. A. (2014). Analysis of space in the phenomenology of Edmund Husserl and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science, 4: 211—218. (In Russ.).
3. Belyaev, A. N. (2019). On the toponymic concept. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University, 1 (423): 13—21. DOI: 10.24411/1994-2796-2019-10102. (In Russ.).
4. Berezovich, E. L. (2009). Russian toponymy in the ethnolinguistic aspect: space and man. Moscow: LIBROCOM. 328 p. ISBN 978-5-397-00101-4. (In Russ.).
5. Berkeley construction grammar. Available at: http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/~kay/bcg/lec02. html (accessed 01.08.2004).
6. Bykanova, V. I. (2011). Dominant spatial concepts. Scientific and Technical Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Humanities and social sciences, 1: 217—220. (In Russ.).
7. Cogos, S., Roué, M., Roturier, S. (2017). Sami Place Names and Maps: Transmitting Knowledge of a Cultural Landscape in Contemporary Contexts. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 49 (1): 43—51. DOI:10.1657/AAAR0016-042.
8. Ermoshkina, G. F. (2022). Microtoponymy of the Smolensk region: a geographical aspect. Geographical environment and living systems, 4: 129—144. DOI: 10.18384/2712- 7621-2022-4-129-144. (In Russ.).
9. Falikman, M. V. (2014). Cognitive science: fundamentals and prospects. The logo, 1 (97): 1—18. (In Russ.).
10. Gak, V. G. (2000). Space outside space. In: Logical analysis of language. Languages of spaces. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture. 127—134. (In Russ.).
11. Gallagher, Sh. (2023). Embodied and Enactive Approaches to Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 84 p.
12. Golomidova, M. V. (1998). Artificial nomination in Russian onomastics. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University. 232 p. ISBN 5-7186-0338-3. (In Russ.).
13. Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. (2006). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 621 p. ISBN 978-0521671781.
14. Grebneva, A. M. (2019). Spatial vocabulary and its role in the formation of the Mordovian toponymic system. Yearbook of Finno-Ugric Studies, 13 (4): 559—567. DOI: 10.35634/2224-9443-2019-13-4-559-567. (In Russ.).
15. Heidegger, M. (2015). Being and time. Moscow: Academic Project. 460 p. ISBN 978-5-8291- 1791-7. (In Russ.).
16. Husserl, E. (2023). The idea of phenomenology: Five lectures. Saint Petersburg: Academy of Humanities. 320 p. ISBN 978-5-93762-191-7. (In Russ.).
17. Kitchin, R. M. (1994). Cognitive maps: What are they and why study them? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14 (1): 1—19. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80194-X.
18. Kondratieva, T. S., Yakovleva, L. A. (2016). Lexico-semantic verbalization of the concept of “space” (based on the toponymy of the South Yakut region). International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research, 11—5: 991—993. (In Russ.).
19. Kopach, A. I. (2020). Toponymic space of Belarus in a cognitive aspect (based on the names of topographic objects of natural naming). Minsk: BDU. 223 p. ISBN 978-985-566- 851-1. (In Belar.).
20. Koroleva, I. A. (2020). Cultural codes in the toponymy of the Roslavl district of the Smolensk region. Bulletin of the Baltic Federal University named after I. Kant. Series: Philology, pedagogy, psychology, 1: 40—47. (In Russ.).
21. Kovlakas, E. F. (2021). On the issue of studying toponyms in the cognitive aspect. Modern studies of social problems, 13 (4): 326—354. DOI: 10.12731/2077-1770-2021-13- 4-326-354. (In Russ.).
22. Kravchenko, A. V. (2004). Language and perception: Cognitive aspects of linguistic categorization. Irkutsk: Irkutsk University Publishing House. 206 p. ISBN 5-7430-0412-9. (In Russ.).
23. Leino, A. (2006). Place-Names as Constructions. Onoma: Journal of The International Council of Onomastic Sciences, 41: 215—235. 10.2143/ONO.41.0.2119617.
24. Levinson, S. C. (1992). Primer for The Field Investigation of Spatial Description and Conception. Pragmatics, 2 (1): 5—47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.2.1.02lev.
25. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1999). Phenomenology of perception. Moscow: Juventus, Nauka Publ. 608 p. ISBN 978-5-02-026807-4. (In Russ.).
26. Milner, D., Goodale, M. (2006). The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 320 p. ISBN 978-0198524724.
27. Nikonov, V. A. (1965). Introduction to toponymy. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 184 p. (In Russ.).
28. Noё, A. (2010). Out of our Heads: Why You are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from The Biology of Cognition. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux. 232 p. ISBN 978- 0809016488.
29. O’Regan,J. K., Noë,A. (2001). Asensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24 (5): 939—973. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01000115.
30. Reszegi, K. (2020). Toponyms and spatial representations. Onomastica, LXIV: 23—39. DOI: 10.17651/ONOMAST.64.4.
31. Reszegi, K. (2023). Places in Mind: Investigating the Link Between Language and Spatial Concepts. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Congress of Onomastic Sciences: Onomastics in Interaction With Other Branches of Science. Keynote Lectures. Toponomastics, Kraków, 22—27.08.2021. Kraków: Jagiellonian University Press. 489—508.
32. Rizzolatti, J., Sinigaglia, K. (2012). Mirrors in the brain. On the mechanisms of joint action and empathy. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures. 208 p. ISBN 978-5-9551- 0561-1. (In Russ.).
33. Shevchuk, O. P. (2021). The toponymic code of culture (based on the Chinese language). Modern pedagogical education, 13 (4): 253—258. (In Russ.).
34. Siegel, A. W., Cousins, J. H. (1985). The symbolizing and symbolized child in the enterprise of cognitive mapping. In: The development of spatial cognition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Publishers. 347—368. ISBN 978-0898595437.
35. Siegel, A. W., White, S. H. (1975). The Development of Spatial Representation of Large-Scale Environments. In: Advances in Child Development and Behavior. New York: Academic Press. 9—55. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2407(08)60007-5.
36. Stolz, T., Levkovych, N. (2020). Grammatical versus onymic classifiers: first thoughts about a potentially interesting topic. In: Aspects of the grammar of names. Empirical case studies and theoretical topics. Munich: LINCOM Europa. 167–180. ISBN 978- 3969390078.
37. Superanskaya, A. V. (1973). General theory of proper names. Moscow: URSS. 366 p. (In Russ.).
38. Ursini, F. A., Zhang, Y. S. (2023). Place and place names: a unified model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14: 1—26. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1237422.
39. Van Langendonck, W. (2007). Theory and Typology of Proper Names. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 378 p. ISBN 978-3110190861.
40. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 308 p. ISBN 978-0262720212.
41. Vasilyeva, T. Y. (2022). Oikonyms of Vitebsk and Mogilev regions objectifying the spatial code of culture: a comparative aspect. In: Regional onomastics: problems and prospects of research. Vitebsk: Masherov Moscow State University. 52—56. (In Belar.).
42. Velichkovsky, B. M. (2006). Cognitive science: Fundamentals of the psychology of cognition: in 2 volumes, 1. Moscow: Akademiya Publ. 448 p. ISBN 5-7695-2984-9. (In Russ.).
43. Zharov, A. N. (2014). Being and space: a transcendental perspective. In: Space as a transcendental prerequisite for cognition of reality. Moscow: IFRAN. 5—30. ISBN 978-5- 9540-0262-1. (In Russ.).
44. Zvereva, Yu. V. (2019). Reflection of the spatial model “top/bottom” in the microtoponymy of the Perm region. Philological Studies, 17 (2): 123—136. DOI: 10.17072/1857- 6060-2019-17-2-123-136. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kopach A.I. Theoretical Aspects of Linguistic Research on Category of Space within Toponymy: From Observer Perception to Agent Motor Skills. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(2):51-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-2-51-71
Views:
405
Email this article 