Perception of Historical Fakes: Experimental Approach and Frame Analysis
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-3-123-155
Abstract
This paper presents the findings of an interdisciplinary study addressing the challenges of countering historical disinformation. Data collected between 2019 and 2021 regarding the perceptions of students in non-history disciplines towards fake information about Russian history published in foreign media are analyzed. The relevance of this research is underscored by the need to gather empirical data on the processes through which Western media disseminate false information about Russia's history, given the significant risk of such narratives infiltrating public consciousness and adversely affecting the cognitive security of society. Utilizing traditional philological analysis alongside cognitive linguistics and frame semantics, the study elucidates the mechanisms by which misleading meanings are integrated into objective historical knowledge. These mechanisms include false markers of credibility and emotionally charged vocabulary. The analysis reveals that respondents often rely on linguistic features of the text, particularly emotionally marked units and negative rhetoric, which do not always facilitate the accurate identification of the truthfulness of historical information. It was found that in cases involving specialized, controversial, or lesser-known historical facts, the use of fakes within a sandwich structure (truth-lie) can lead to a replacement of genuine knowledge with distorted perceptions, thereby blurring the foundations of objective personal understanding.
About the Authors
A. M. Merkulova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastasiya M. Merkulova - PhD in History, Associate Professor, Department of History of State and Municipal Administration.
Moscow
A. A. Sharapkova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastasia A. Sharapkova - PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of English Linguistics.
Moscow
References
1. Arens, W. (1979). The Man-Eating Myth: Anthropology and Anthropophagy: Anthropology and Anthropophagy. New York: Oxford University Press. 220 p. ISBN 9780199763443.
2. Baker, C. F., Fillmore, C. J. (1998). The Berkeley FrameNet Project. 36th Annual Meeting of The Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1: 86—90.
3. Balmasov, S. S. (2006). The Red Terror in the East of Russia in 1918—1922. Moscow: Posev. 383 p. ISBN 5-85824-167-0. (In Russ.).
4. Bishop, J., Michaels, D. (1997). Stalin’s Plan to Conquer Europe. The Journal of Historical Review, 6: 22—34.
5. Cerini, M. (2018). House of Faberge: The story behind The world's most luxurious eggs. CNN style. 14.08.2018. Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/faberge-luxurious-eggs/index.html (accessed 30.11.2024).
6. Clausewitz, K. (1994). About the war. Moscow: Logos: Nauka Publ. 446 p. ISBN 5-88439-080-7. (In Russ.).
7. Della Sala, V. (2010). Political myth, mythology and The European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48 (1): 1—19.
8. Fillmore, C. J. (1976). Frame semantics and The nature of language. Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences, 280: 20—32.
9. Fillmore, C. J. (2003). Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16 (3): 235—250. DOI: 10.1093/ijl/16.3.235.
10. Flood, C. (2013). Political myth. New York: Routledge. 276 p. ISBN 1135347883.
11. Gelfert, A. (2018). Fake news: a Definition. Informal Logic, 38 (1): 84—117.
12. Gerasimov, M. M. (1965). Documentary portrait of Ivan the Terrible. Brief reports of the Institute of Archeology of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 100: 139—142. (In Russ.).
13. Gerasimov, O. V. (2012). Historical facts and historical concepts and their role in the formation of historical knowledge. XXI century: results of the past and problems of the present plus, 3: 31—37. (In Russ.).
14. Goatly, A. (2007). Washing The Brain. Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 431 p.
15. Goldin, V. I. (2019). The Civil War in the history of Russia: historiography, modern approaches, preparation of a new academic publication. The modern History of Russia, 9 (3): 758—774. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu24.2019.314. (In Russ.).
16. González, A. M. (2012). Introduction. Emotional Culture and The Role of Emotions in Cultural Analysis. In: The Emotions and Cultural Analysis. Surrey / Burlington: Ashgate. 1—15.
17. Gray, J. A. (1985). The whole and its parts: Behaviour, The brain, cognition and emotion. Bulletin of The British Psychological Society, 38: 99—112.
18. Grieve, J. (2023). The Language of Fake News. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 75 p. — ISBN 9781009349130.
19. Jackendoff, R. S. (1983). Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press. 283 p.
20. Karamzin, N. M. (2000). History of the Russian State. In: History of the Russian State. Saint Petersburg: Kristall Publ. 704 p. (In Russ.).
21. Kenix, L. J. (2021). A missed opportunity? President trump, The truth sandwich, and news coverage across an ideological spectrum. Media Watch, 12 (2): 177—196.
22. Kondrashin, V. V. (2018). Famine of 1932—1933: the tragedy of the Russian countryside. Moscow: ROSSPEN. 565 p. ISBN 978-5-8243-2273-6. (In Russ.).
23. Kovalchenko, I. D. (2003). Methods of historical research. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 485 p. ISBN 5-02-008893-5. (In Russ.).
24. Lakoff, G. (2008). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago press. 308 p. ISBN 0226470997.
25. Li Guangman. (2021). Everyone can feel that profound changes are taking place! 29.08. Available at: http://politics.people.com.cn/BIG5/n1/2021/0829/c1001-32211523.html (accessed 19.10.2022). (In Russ.).
26. Litvin, A. L. (2004). The Red and White Terror in Russia in 1917—1922. Moscow: Yauza: EKSMO. 441 p. ISBN 5-87849-164-8. (In Russ.).
27. Lowes, W. (2001). Fabergé Eggs: a Retrospective Encyclopedia. [b. m.]: Scarecrow Press. 286 p.
28. Manerko, L. A. (2023). Self-identification of a personality as a reflection of three categorical shifts in the semantics of the terminosphere. Cognitive studies of language, 56 (5): 60—67. (In Russ.).
29. Morozova, L. E. (2022). Ivan the Terrible through the eyes of contemporaries. Moscow: Kuchkovo Pole. 379 p. ISBN 978-5-907171-63-3. (In Russ.).
30. Nakazawa, A. (2003). The manuscript of Magnus: Research. and texts. Saint Petersburg: Dmitry Bulanin. 173 p. (In Russ.).
31. Narayanan, S. (2003). FrameNet meets The semantic we: Lexical semantics for The web. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. The Semantic Web — ISWC 2003, 2870: 771—787. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39718-2_49.
32. Nedelko, N. F. (2012). Was the son of Tsar Ivan IV the Terrible killed? Siberian Medical Journal, 3. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/a-byl-li-ubit-syn-tsarya-ivana-iv-groznogo (accessed 11/30/2024). (In Russ.).
33. Ortony, A. (1990). What’s basic about basic emotions? Psychological Review, 97 (3): 315—331. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.3.315.
34. Pocheptsov, G. G. (2015). Information wars a new policy tool. Moscow: Algorithm. 254 p. ISBN 978-5-4438-1027-0. (In Russ.).
35. Preston, S. (2021). Detecting fake news on Facebook: The role of emotional intelligence. Plos one, 16 (3): 1—13. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246757.
36. Ratkovsky, I. S. (2006). The Red Terror and the activities of the Cheka in 1918. Saint Petersburg: Publishing House of Saint Petersburg University. 279 p. ISBN 5-288-03903-8. (In Russ.).
37. Sharapkova, A. A. (2020). Myth of King Arthur as a Conceptual Matrix for Understanding Brexit. Nauchnyi dialog, 5: 192—214. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-5-192-214 (In Russ.).
38. Sharapkova, A. A., Merkulova, A. M. (2023). Fakes within Context of Historical Knowledge Interacting with Language and Thought Structures: Interdisciplinary Model. Nauchnyi dialog, 12 (2): 157—186. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-2-157-187 (In Russ.).
39. Shaskolsky, I. P. (1995). The Battle of Nevsky in 1240 In the light of the data of modern science. Prince Alexander Nevsky and his epoch. 15—23. (In Russ.).
40. Singer, T. (2014). The vision thing: Myth, politics and psyche in The world. London: Routledge. 300 p.
41. Solopova, O. A., Chudinov, A. P. (2018). Diachronic analysis of metaphors in the British corpus of texts: Victory Bells and Russia’s V-Day. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 22 (2): 313—337. (In Russ.).
42. Tarle, E. V. (1994). Selected works of academician E. V. Tarle in 4 volumes, 1. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix. 574 p. ISBN 5-85880-052-1. (In Russ.).
43. The History of Russia: in 20 volumes. The Russian Civil War. The years 1917—1922, 12. (2024). Moscow: Nauka. 919 p. ISBN 978-5-02-041024-4. (In Russ.).
44. Trut, V. P. (2022). Modern approaches to the characterization of the chronological framework of the Civil War in Russia. Bulletin of the Volga. Episode 4, The Story. Regional studies. International relations, 4. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennye-podhody-k-harakteristike-hronologicheskih-ramok-grazhdanskoy-voyny-v-rossii (accessed 01.11.2024). (In Russ.).
45. Vinkers, C. H. (2015). Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis. British Medical Journal, 351: 64—67. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h6467.
46. Zabotkina, V. I., Pozdnyakova, E. M. (2023). Mental spaces of manipulative influence in media discourse. Questions of cognitive linguistics, 4: 15—25. (In Russ.).
47. Zago, R. (2021). Televisual Expressivity: Emphasis and Emotionality in American and British Singing Competition Shows. Expressio, 5: 209—228.
48. Zemskov, V. N. (2012). The scale of political repression in the USSR (against speculative and mythological constructions). Proceedings of the Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 3—1. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/masshtaby-politicheskih-repressiy-v-sssr-protiv-spekulyativnyh-i-mifologicheskih-postroeniy (accessed 11/30/2024). (In Russ.).
49. Zemtsov, V. N. (2001). Velikaya Napoleon’s army in the Battle of Borodino. Yekaterinburg: Ur. gosudarstvennogo ped. Univ. 572 p. ISBN 5-7186-0259-X. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Merkulova A.M., Sharapkova A.A. Perception of Historical Fakes: Experimental Approach and Frame Analysis. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(3):123-155. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-3-123-155
Views:
453
Email this article 