Semantics and Functioning of Color Terminology in Autobiographies of Artists from Late 19th to Early 20th Century
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-4-155-173
Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive review and analysis of the instances of color terminology used in the discourse of artists as professionals engaged with color. The aim of this research is to uncover the specific features of color perception and verbalization, as well as the employment of color names in the language of artists. The study is based on 2,500 contexts selected from the autobiographies of notable figures such as Marc Chagall, Konstantin Korovin, Kuzma Petrov-Vodkin, Ilya Repin, and Nicholas Roerich. Employing methods from structural analysis (component analysis, distributional analysis, semantic field analysis), cognitive semantics (cognitive interpretation method), and psycholinguistics (experiments, surveys), the paper presents general statistics on the usage of color names within the analyzed material. A categorization of color terminology is proposed based on cognitive foundations, corresponding to the type and level of mental distortion of color in relation to objective reality. The analysis addresses color names in the context of artists’ speech, examining their use as both painters and art philosophers. The role of generic terms kraska [paint] in reflecting the material embodiment of color is also discussed. Additionally, the study raises questions regarding the use of prototypical combinations (e.g., zelenyy lug [green meadow]). It is established that artists conceptualize color names as independent phenomena, subjects of discussion and evaluation, aiming for precision in expression over vividness, and tending to utilize professional terminology while imbuing color names with additional evaluative qualities.
About the Authors
M. M. SandalovaRussian Federation
Maria M. Sandalova – Postgraduate student, lecturer of the Department of the Russian, Speech Culture and Teaching Methods
Kirov,
L. V. Kalinina
Russian Federation
Liudmila V. Kalinina – Doctor of Philology, Professor of the Department of the Russian, Speech Culture and Teaching Methods
Kirov,
References
1. Bakhilina, N. B. (1975). The history of color designations in the Russian language. Moscow: Nauka Publishing House. 288 p. (In Russ.).
2. Bazyma, B. A. (2005). Psychology of color: theory and practice. St. Petersburg: Speech. 205 p. ISBN 5-9268-0363-2. (In Russ.).
3. Berlin, В., Kay, P. (1969). Basic Color Terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press. 186 p.
4. Bragina, A. A. (1972). “Color” definitions and the formation of new meanings of words and phrases. In: Lexicology and lexicography: collection of articles. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 200 p. (In Russ.).
5. Denisov, V. S. (2008). Perception of color, 1. Moscow: Eksmo. 176 p. (In Russ.).
6. Dennett, D. (2021). Pumps of intuition and other tools of thinking. Moscow: AST Publishing House: CORPUS. 576 p. ISBN 978-5-17-112947-7. (In Russ.).
7. Deutscher, G. (2018). Through the mirror of language. Moscow: AST Publishing House. 382 p. ISBN 978-5-17-114373-2. (In Russ.).
8. Frumkina, R. M. (1984). Color, meaning, similarity. Aspects of psychological analysis. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 175 p. (In Russ.).
9. Gladstone, W. E. (1858). Homer’s perception and use of colour. In: Studies on Homer and Homeric age. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 457—499.
10. Hargrave, S. (1982). A report on colour term research in five Aboriginal languages. In: Work Papers of SIL-AAB Series B. Darwin: Summer Institute of Linguistics Australian Aborigines Branch. 8: 201—238.
11. Kalinina, L. V. (2021). The autobiographical prose of the artist as a material for linguistic and cognitive analysis (on the example of the work of K. S. Petrov-Vodkin “Euclid’s Space”). In: Semantics and functioning of linguistic units in different types of speech: collection of articles of the International scientific conference, Yaroslavl, September 18—19, 2020. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushinsky. 53—65. ISBN 978-5-00089-519-1. (In Russ.).
12. Kay, P. (1978). The linguistic significance of the meaning of basic colour terms. Language. 610—646.
13. Kharchenko, V. K. (2012). Linguosensory: Fundamental and applied aspects. Moscow: LIBROCOM. 216 p. ISBN 978-5-397-02316-0. (In Russ.).
14. Kovtun, E. (1960). How to watch a painting. The language of painting. Leningrad: Uchpedgiz Publ. 90 p. (In Russ.).
15. Nagornaya, A. V. (2017). Linguistic sensorics as a promising area of modern linguistic research: Analysis. Review. Moscow: INION RAS. 86 p. ISBN 978-5-248-00844-5. (In Russ.).
16. Rakhilina, E. V. (2008). Cognitive analysis of subject names: semantics and compatibility. Moscow: Russian Dictionaries. 416 p. ISBN 5-93259-016-5. (In Russ.).
17. Rosch Heider, E. (1972). Universals in color naming and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93 (1): 10—20.
18. Sandalova, M. M. (2023). Features of the functioning of color names in the speech of artists and non-artists (based on the material of social networks). In: Language — text — discourse in the new conditions of communication (dedicated to the 60th anniversary of Professor T. B. Radbil). Nizhny Novgorod: NNSU named after N. I. Lobachevsky. 396—403. ISBN 978-5-91326-862-4. (In Russ.).
19. Sandalova, M. M. (2024). Generic color naming “paint” in the “Euclidean space” by K. S. Petrov-Vodkin as a material embodiment of color. In: Semantics. Functioning. Text. Kirov: [b. i.]. 97—102. (In Russ.).
20. Schwarzlose, R. (2024). Landscapes of the brain. About the amazing distorted maps of our brain and how they guide us through life. Moscow: AST Publishing House: CORPUS. 336 p. ISBN 978-5-17-152721-1. (In Russ.).
21. Sullivan, K. (2006). How does art «speak», and what does it «say”»? Conceptual metaphor theory as a tool for understanding the artistic process. In: Thought tools for a new generation: essays on thought, ideas, and the power of expression. Oregon: Clark Honors College. 81—89.
22. Unkovsky, A. A. (1980). Painting: Issues of color. Moscow: Prosveshchenie Publ. 128 p. (In Russ.).
23. Van Brackel, J. (1993). The plasticity of categories: The case of colour. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44: 103—135.
24. Vasnetsov, A. (1908). The experience of analyzing concepts defining the art of painting. Moscow: Edition by I. Knebel. 133 p. (In Russ.).
25. Vezhbitskaya, A. (1996). Language. Culture. Cognition. Moscow: Russian Dictionaries. 416 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Sandalova M.M., Kalinina L.V. Semantics and Functioning of Color Terminology in Autobiographies of Artists from Late 19th to Early 20th Century. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(4):155-173. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-4-155-173