Periphrases of St. Petersburg in Contemporary Media Discourse: A Pragmatic Perspective
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-4-191-210
Abstract
This article examines the distinctive features of periphrastic nominations of St. Petersburg in modern media texts, as represented in the newspaper corpus of the Russian National Corpus. The study aims to identify the current meanings and functional capabilities of these units within media discourse. The relevance of this research is underscored by its linguo-pragmatic focus, emphasizing the importance of studying toponymic periphrases as a means of influencing readers and as a significant linguistic resource for journalists. It is demonstrated that figurative nominations of St. Petersburg are actively employed in media texts, assisting authors in marking the location of events, shaping perceptions of the city, providing evaluations, and highlighting necessary meanings. The author identifies several functions of periphrases, including references to historical epochs, means of poeticization, positive evaluation, substantive characterization, and assessing contemporary events through historical associations; the synonymous replacement of a toponym with a figurative expression allows for the avoidance of repetition. In newspaper texts, the semantic scope of toponymic periphrases varies, with an observable expansion of meanings and the development of metaphorical imagery. The use of periphrases confirms the relevance of the topic of comparing the two capitals for native speakers. Examples are provided illustrating the construction of puns using St. Petersburg periphrases based on homonymy, polysemy, antonymy of statement components, as well as structural-semantic transformations of periphrastic constructions.
About the Author
E. A. Bespalova
Southwest State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina A. Bespalova – PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics
Kursk
References
1. Artamonov, D. S. (2020). “Window to Europe” in cultural memory: metamorphoses of frontier metaphor. Journal of Frontier Studies, 5 / 2 (18): 78—91. DOI: 10.46539/jfs.v5i2.204. (In Russ.).
2. Basko, N. V. (2018). Modern media text in the aspect of cultural studies: figurative names of geographical objects. Scientific Bulletin of Belgorod State University. Series: Humanities, 37 (4): 573—582. DOI: 10.18413/2075-4574-2018-37-4-573-582. (In Russ.).
3. Bespalova, E. A., Elnikova, A. V. (2021). Biblical Phraseological Units with an Anthroponym in Modern Media Texts. Nauchnyi dialog, 6: 29—42. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-6-29-42. (In Russ.).
4. Bobrova, M. V. (2023). Features of the functioning of modern polionyms of St. Petersburg. Onomastics of the Volga region: Proceedings of the XXI International Scientific Conference. 165—169. (In Russ.).
5. Chernyak, V. D. (2004). The concept of “Petersburg” in modern political discourse. Linguistics. Bulletin of the Ural Linguistic Society, 12: 139—148. (In Russ.).
6. Chernyak, V. D. (2022). The image of St. Petersburg in the thesaurus of linguistic personality. Language and culture. 62—69. DOI: 10.33580/9785001289425_62. (In Russ.).
7. Degtyareva, E. O. (2012). Coding and conspiratorial functions of substantive metaphorical phrases in poetry of the Silver Age (based on the semantic field “city”). Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Russian Philology, 5: 20—24. (In Russ.).
8. Dureko, E. Y. (2012). The media concept “capital” and its variation in journalistic discourse. Proceedings of the Ural Federal University. Series 1: Problems of education, science and culture, 101 (2): 77—83. (In Russ.).
9. Elistratova, K. A. (2012). Lexical objectification of toponymic logoepistems “Moscow” vs. “Petersburg” in modern poetic discourse (based on texts by V. Polozkova and E. Fanailova). Cherepovets scientific readings, 1: 68—70. (In Russ.).
10. Ganova, S. V. (2012). Conceptualization of oikonyms. The world of science, culture, and education, 1 (32): 362—365. (In Russ.).
11. Grekhneva, L. V. (2009). Features of peripheral nomination. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Lobachevsky University, 6—2: 207—210. (In Russ.).
12. Gukova, L. N. (2010). Semantic and stylistic paradigm of a toponym: posing a question. Mov, 15: 131—138. (In Russ.).
13. Izmailov, N. V. (1978). Notes to the text of the poem “The Bronze Horseman”. In: The Bronze Horseman. Leningrad: Nauka Publ. 266—270. (In Russ.).
14. Kalinina, S. A. (2020). Toponymic phraseological units of modern English as signs of material and spiritual culture. Bulletin of Tomsk State Pedagogical University, 4 (210): 23—29. DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2020-4-23-29. (In Russ.).
15. Kirichenko, O. K. (2005). The concept of “Petersburg” in the speech usage of the city. Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. St. Petersburg. 20 p. (In Russ.).
16. Kirichenko, O. K. (2006). The city on the Neva, the city of white nights, the cultural capital… The world of the Russian word, 2: 108—112. (In Russ.).
17. Kryukov, P. A. (2011). The role of the extralinguistic factor in the formation of the German toponymicon (on the example of the ideological component in northern and eastern Germany in the period from 1933 to the 1990s). Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Linguistics, 6: 133—138. (In Russ.).
18. Sirivlya, M. A. (2007). Periphrasis as an expressive means of newspaper language (semantic and pragmatic aspect). Author’s abstract of PhD Diss. Chelyabinsk. 23 p. (In Russ.).
19. Toponymy of Alexander Blok’s Petersburg. (2018). The world of science, culture, and education, 2 (69): 510—513. (In Russ.).
20. Toporov, V. N. (2003). The Petersburg text of Russian literature: Selected works. Saint Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPB. 612 p. ISBN 5210015459. (In Russ.).
21. Tort-Donada, J. (2022). Toponymy as a tool for the geographical interpretation of the region: some methodological foundations. European Cartographic Conference. 71—79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-5-150-2022.
Review
For citations:
Bespalova E.A. Periphrases of St. Petersburg in Contemporary Media Discourse: A Pragmatic Perspective. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(4):191-210. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-4-191-210
Views:
516
Email this article 