From Viewpoint to Reverse Metaphorization: An Analysis of Deliberate Visual Metaphors in Lifelong Learning
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-6-197-218
Abstract
This study investigates the deliberate use of visual metaphors on a university website. The research material comprises images featured in thematic sections related to lifelong learning (LLL). Special attention is given to the viewpoint as a marker of deliberateness in visual metaphor and a key element in constructing the connotation of the image. The objective of this research is to unveil the interpretative function of the viewpoint in photographs depicting lifelong learning. The analytical methodology is based on a combination of methods and techniques derived from theories of conceptual, primary, and deliberate metaphors, adapted for the purposes of this study. It is established that the upward-pointing perspective in visual messages about lifelong learning serves as a means to convey qualitative characteristics of the interactions between the central figures in the images. Through examples, it is demonstrated that the target domain of LIFELONG LEARNING is represented using the source domain of INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS. It is found that, based on universal knowledge of the value of social connections and emotional support, the authors of the images intentionally activate the metaphorical projection UNIVERSITY — PEOPLE WHO UNDERSTAND THE ADULT STUDENT. Furthermore, it is revealed that manipulation of the viewpoint generates the phenomenon of reverse metaphorization and leads to an inversion of conceptual domains (ADULT STUDENTS — UNIVERSITY).
Keywords
About the Authors
N. V. MongilyovaRussian Federation
Natalya V. Mongilyova, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of Foreign Philology
Kostanay
Y. S. Talybova
Russian Federation
Yana S. Talybova, Department of Foreign Philology
Kostanay
References
1. Bae, S., Grimm, A., Kim, D. (2021). Only one way to be a world-class university? Comparative analysis on the texts and visual images on websites of universities in China and South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43: 144—159. DOI:10.1080/02188791.2021.1904832.
2. Barth, R. (1989). The rhetoric of the image. In: Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics. Moscow: Progress Publ. 616 p. ill. ISBN 978-5-458-48927-0. (In Russ.).
3. Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. P. 278. ISBN 978-0-230-00061-2.
4. Dancygier, B., Vandelanotte, L. (2017). Image-schematic scaffolding in textual and visual artefacts. Journal of Pragmatics, 122: 91—106. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.07.013.
5. Dancygier, B., Vandelanotte, L. (2017). Viewpoint phenomena in multimodal communication. Cognitive Linguistics, 28 (3): 371—598. DOI: 10.1515/cog-2017-0075.
6. Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. PhD Diss. Berkeley. 299 p.
7. Grady, J. (2005). Image schemas and perception: Refining a definition. From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. 36—56. — DOI: 10.1515/9783110197532.1.35.
8. Johnson, M. (2015). Embodied understanding. Frontiers in Psychology. Eugene, Origona, 6. Available at: http://10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00875www.frontiersin.org (accessed 14.11.2024).
9. Kinnari, H., Silvennoinen, H. (2023). Subjectivities of the lifelong learner in ‘humanistic generation’ — Critical policy analysis of lifelong learning policies among discourses of UNESCO, the Council of Europe and the OECD. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 4 (42): 424—440. DOI: 10.1080/02601370.2023.2234089.
10. Kress, G. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Desig. New York: Routledge. 204 p. ISBN-13: 978-0415319157.
11. Lakoff, G. (2014). Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/humaneuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958/full (accessed 29.06.2024).
12. Ng, C.J.W., Koller, V. (2013). Deliberate Conventional Metaphor in Images: The Case of Corporate Branding Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 3 (28): 131—147. DOI: 10.1080/10926488.2013.797807.
13. Ortiz Maria, J. (2010). Visual Rhetoric: Primary Metaphors and Symmetric Object Alignment. Metaphor and Symbol, 3 (25): 162—180. DOI: 10.1080/10926488.2010.489394.
14. Steen, G.J. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23 (4): 213—241. DOI: 10.1080/10926480802426753.
15. Steen, G. J. (2011). What does ‘really deliberate’ really mean? More thoughts on metaphor and consciousness. Metaphor and the Social World, 1 (1): 53—56. DOI: 10.1075/msw.1.1.04ste.
16. Volles, N. (2016). Lifelong learning in the EU: changing conceptualisations, actors, and policies. Studies in Higher Education. 1—21. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2014.927852.
17. Zhu, L. (2023). A Cognitive Reflection on the Viewpoint Phenomena in Construction and Discourse. Communications in Humanities Research, 3: 174—181. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/3/2022024.
Review
For citations:
Mongilyova N.V., Talybova Y.S. From Viewpoint to Reverse Metaphorization: An Analysis of Deliberate Visual Metaphors in Lifelong Learning. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(6):197-218. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-6-197-218