“Lebanese Protocol”: Ethnic Quota Systems in Kabardino-Balkaria’s Power-Sharing Arrangements (1950s-2020s)
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-6-537-554
Abstract
While ethnic quotas remain a cornerstone of power distribution in Kabardino-Balkaria (KBR), their historical evolution and impact on political stability — particularly in the post-Soviet period — remain understudied. This article traces the transformation of ethnic quota systems in KBR from the 1950s through the 2020s, analyzing their role in balancing interests among Kabardin, Balkar, and Russian communities. Drawing on government meeting protocols, electoral commission records, ethnic composition statistics, elite interviews, political memoirs, and parliamentary publications, the study employs mixed-methods analysis. Qualitative and quantitative examination of top officials' ethnic backgrounds reveals: Cases of “rotating” ethnic quotas, informal rules governing long-term ethnic monopolies on specific positions or instances of proportional distribution across groups. The findings demonstrate that ethnic quotas persist as a stabilization mechanism despite tensions with formal legal-state principles. Future research should examine municipal-level implementation and the influence of socioeconomic factors on decision-making processes.
Keywords
Supporting agencies: The study was carried out with the financial support of an Internal grant from KBSU (Agreement № 12)
About the Authors
A. A. Tumov
Kabardino-Balkarian State University named after H. M. Berbekov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Asker A. Tumov, PhD in History, Associate Professor, Department of General History
Nalchik
A. A. Tatarov
Kabardian-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Azamat A. Tatarov, PhD in History, Associate Professor, Department of General History
Nalchik
References
1. Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. London: Profile books. 571 p. ISBN 978-1-84668-429-6.
2. Adiev, A. Z., Akkieva, S. I., Shcherbina, E. A. (2017). Ethnicity and distribution of power positions in Kabardino-Balkaria and Karachay-Cherkessia from the perspective of expert opinions. In: Humanitarian and Socio-Political Problems of Modernization of the North Caucasus. Collection Of Scientific Articles of The V International Conference. Magas: Kep LLC. 8—19. (In Russ.).
3. Astvatsaturova, M. A., Adiev, A. Z. (2017). On the problem of theoretical understanding of “informal ethnic quotas” among the political and managerial elite. In: Collection of scientific articles of the Institute of Social Research of IngSU. Magas: Ingush State University. 47—64. (In Russ.).
4. Bird, K. (2014). Ethnic quotas and ethnic representation worldwide. International Political Science Review, 35 (1): 12—26. DOI: 10.1177/0192512113507798.
5. Borov, A. H., Tumov, A. A. (2017). Elites and the post-Soviet transformation of political regimes in the republics of the North Caucasus: the “case” of KabardinoBalkaria. Historical Journal: Scientific Research, 4: 40—55. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0609.2017.4.23356. (In Russ.).
6. Derlugyan, G. (2010). Bourdieu’s Adept in the Caucasus. Moscow: Territory of the Future. 558 p. ISBN 978-5-91129-063-4. (In Russ.).
7. Dokshokov, M. I. (1998). The main privilege is responsibility for others. Nalchik: El-Fa. 197 p. ISBN 5-881950313-4. (In Russ.).
8. Gallyamov, R. R. (1998). Political elites of the Russian republics: peculiarities of transformation in the post-Soviet period. Polis. Political Research, 2: 108—115. (In Russ.).
9. Gelman, V. Ya. (2019). “Unworthy government”: politics in modern Russia. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the European University in St. Petersburg. 254 p. ISBN 978-5- 94380-286-7. (In Russ.).
10. Horowitz, D. L. (2014). Ethnic power sharing: Three big problems. Journal of Democracy, 25 (2): 5—20. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2014.0020.
11. Juon, A. (2020). Minorities overlooked: Group-based power-sharing and the exclusion-amidinclusion dilemma. International Political Science Review, 41 (1): 89—107. DOI: 10.1177/0192512119859206.
12. Kazenin, K. (2009). “Quiet” conflicts in the North Caucasus: Adygea, Kabardino-Balkaria, Karachay-Cherkessia. Moscow: Regnum. 179 p. ISBN 978-5-86863-191-9. (In Russ.).
13. Kazenin, K., Starodubrovskaya, I. (2016). The North Caucasus and the modern model of democratic development. Expert report. Available at: https://www.iep.ru/files/news/irinas-kazenin_kaukasus_01.04.16.pdf (accessed 12.04.2025). (In Russ.).
14. Kendhammer, B. (2015). Getting our piece of the national cake: Consociational power sharing and neopatrimonialism in Nigeria. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 21 (2): 143— 165. DOI: 10.1080/13537113.2015.1032023.
15. Kokov, V. M. (1998). Roads of reform. Economics and government in the context of market transformations. (Articles, interviews, speeches). Moscow: Slavic Dialogue. 383 p. ISBN 5-85468-099-8. (In Russ.).
16. Kosikov, I. G. (ed.). (2012). The Republics of the North Caucasus: the ethnopolitical situation and relations with the federal center. Moscow: MAKS Press. 503 p. ISBN 978-5- 317-04288-2. (In Russ.).
17. Litvinova, T. (2011). Political institutions in the North Caucasus in the context of the development of Russian statehood. Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing. 292 p. ISBN 978-3-8443-5935-0. (In Russ.).
18. Martin, T. (2001). The affirmative action empire: nations and nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923—1939. London: Cornell University Press. 554 p. ISBN 0801486777.
19. North, D., Wallis, J., Weingast, B. (2009). Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. New York: Cambridge University Press. 308 p. ISBN 9781107646995.
20. Osipov, A. (2012). Implementation unwanted? Symbolic vs. Instrumental policies in the Russian management of ethnic diversity. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 13 (4): 425—442. DOI: 10.1017/nps.2018.26.
21. Panov, P. (2016). In search of inter-ethnic balance: ethnic composition and informal powersharing in Russian national republics. European Politics and Society, 17 (3): 353— 372. DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2016.1183744.
22. Pearson, S. (2015). The “national key” in Bosnia and Herzegovina: a historical perspective. Nationalities Papers, 43 (2): 213—232. DOI: 10.1080/00905992.2014.1002463.
23. Slezkine, Y. (1994). The USSR as a Communal Apartment, or How a Socialist State Promoted Ethnic Particularism. Slavic Review, 53 (2): 414—452. DOI: 10.2307/2501300.
24. Yemelianova, G. M. (2005). Kinship, ethnicity and religion in post-Communist societies: Russia’s autonomous republic of Kabardino-Balkariya. Ethnicities, 5 (1): 51—82. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/1468796805049926.
25. Zumakulov, B. M. (2005). Institute of Elections in Kabardino-Balkaria. Nalchik: El-Fa. 420 p. ISBN 5-88195-583-8. (In Russ.).
26. Zumakulov, B. M. (2017). About time and about myself. Nalchik: Tetragraf. 367 p. ISBN 978- 5-00066-114-7. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Tumov A.A., Tatarov A.A. “Lebanese Protocol”: Ethnic Quota Systems in Kabardino-Balkaria’s Power-Sharing Arrangements (1950s-2020s). Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(6):537-554. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-6-537-554
Views:
54
Email this article 