“We-Identity” Discourse in Academic Communications and Favored Groups of 21st Century Russia
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-7-161-181
Abstract
This article examines the academic discourse of “we-identity,” established within the practices of authors and readers of scientific texts as a discursive community. The empirical data source comprises highly cited publications from the Russian Index of the Science Citation database published between 2000 and 2024, featuring the lexeme “identity” in their titles, along with the titles of citing publications and contexts of citation. A discursive-analytical approach to the research allows for the characterization of conceptual strategies in the unfolding of the “we-identity” scientific discourse against the backdrop of shifting favored groups within Russian society, delineating four distinct phases: 2000–2009 — Russian identity as part of a globalization and transculturalism narrative; 2010–2013 — Russian identity, still affiliated with the global community, becomes fragmented along sociographic lines; 2014–2021 — a marked transition from global identity to local identity; 2022–2024 — a shift from local identity to national solidarity. It is established that the landscape of Russian scientific discourse on “we-identity” is marked by lexemes reflecting the emergence and transition of favored groups in Russian society, relevant to each new period of selfidentification. The study concludes that there has been a fourfold change in favored groups within the “we-identity” scientific discourse of the 21st century: these are the global community, sociographic group, region, and nation.
Supporting agencies: The study is supported by St. Petersburg State University, project 124032600013-2
About the Authors
N. E. Shilkina
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia E. Shilkina - Doctor of Sociology, Associate Professor, Department of Sociology of Youth and Youth Policy
St. Petersburg
A. V. Maltseva
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna V. Maltseva- Doctor of Sociology, Professor, Department of Social Analysis and Mathematical Methods in Sociology
St. Petersburg
S. D. Gurieva
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana D. Gurieva - Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Department of Social Psychology
St. Petersburg
References
1. Astafieva, O. N. (2010). Restructuring and demarcation of collective identities in the context of globalization: the future of national and cultural identity. Questions of social theory, 4: 255—281. (In Russ.).
2. Avksentiev, V. A., Aksyumov, B. V. (2022). “Portfolio of identities” of the youth of the South of Russia after 12 years. Sociological research, 7: 76—87. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250019645-2. (In Russ.).
3. Badmaev, V. N., Khutyz, Z. A. (2009). Historical memory and the construction of national identity. New technologies, 4: 75—79. (In Russ.).
4. Baev, P. A. (2023). The civil and national identity of Russians. Sociology, 4: 69—76. (In Russ.).
5. Baklanova, O. A. (2022). The value foundations of sociocultural communication as a manifestation of the identity of social subjects. Bulletin of the Armavir State Pedagogical University, 4: 155—163. (In Russ.).
6. Balandin, D. N. (2023). Psychological support of the process of forming the ethnocultural identity of adolescents on the basis of intergenerational dialogue. Scientific notes. Electronic scientific journal of Kursk State University, 4: 318—325. (In Russ.).
7. Bugaichuk, T. V. (2022). Civic identity of the younger generation of Russians: specifics and patterns of formation. Socio-political studies, 1: 70—80. DOI: 10.20323/2658428X-2022-1-14-70-80. (In Russ.).
8. Bugaichuk, T. V. (2022). The political aspect of the formation of civic identity and the features of socio-cultural transformation in modern Russia. The world of Russian-speaking countries, 1: 5—22. DOI: 10.20323/2658-7866-2022-1-11-5-22. (In Russ.).
9. Dijk Teun, A. van. (2008). Discourse and Context. A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 282 р. ISBN 978-0-511-42320-8.
10. Drobizheva, L. M. (2008). National-civil and ethnic identity: problems of positive compatibility. Russia is reforming, 7: 214—227. (In Russ.).
11. Fairclough, N. (1996). Technologisation of discourse. In: Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge. 143—159.
12. Galaktionova, N. A. (2010). Civil identity as a component of personal identity. News of higher educational institutions. Sociology. Economy. Politics, 1: 10—12. (In Russ.).
13. Golomidova, M. V. (2022). Urban toponyms in the aspect of regional identity translation: a case study of Ufa. Questions of onomastics, 19 (1): 160—179. DOI: 10.15826/vopr_onom.2022.19.1.008. (In Russ.).
14. Golovneva, E. V. (2017). Regional identity and identity of the region. Proceedings of the Ural Federal University. Series 3: Social Sciences, 12 (3): 182—189. (In Russ.).
15. Golubeva, G. F. (2014). Formation of professional identity of future specialists. Alma Mater (Bulletin of Higher School), 9: 47—49. (In Russ.).
16. Goncharova, A. V. (2022). Historical and cultural memory as a condition for preserving national identity. Scientific result. Social and humanitarian studies, 8 (1): 134—141. (In Russ.).
17. Gorlova, I. I., Zorin, A. L. (2023). Formation and strengthening of the All-Russian identity and civic unity as priority directions of modern state policy of the Russian Federation. Socio-humanitarian knowledge, 2: 5—9. (In Russ.).
18. Kataev, D. V., Karavaeva, Yu. V. (2023). The importance of interests in the formation of civic identity. Theory and practice of social development, 12: 47—53. DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2023.12.4. (In Russ.).
19. Kibrik, A. A. (2009). Mode, genre and other parameters of the classification of discourses. Questions of linguistics, 2: 3—21. (In Russ.).
20. Kochina, E. A. (2015). Civic identity in a multiethnic region as an element of national identity. Innovative Science, 2 (6): 255—257. (In Russ.).
21. Koptseva, N. P. (2015). The construction of ethnocultural and national identity as a philosophical problem. Philosophy and Culture, 1: 12—19. (In Russ.).
22. Kravchenko, N. Y. (2016). Civil identity of modern Russia. Proceedings of the Saratov University. A new series. Series: Sociology. Political science, 16 (1): 5—8. (In Russ.).
23. Kuznetsov, K. A. (2014). National identity and sustainable statehood. Comparative Politics, 5 (1): 31—36. (In Russ.).
24. Malenkov, V. V. (2022). Patriotism, citizenship in politics and youth identity. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science, 67: 120—131. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/67/11. (In Russ.).
25. Malinova, O. Y. (2005). Politics research and discourse on identity. Political Science, 3: 8—20. (In Russ.).
26. Maltseva, A. (2019). Theory of semantic field for sentiment-analysis of the language of specific users' group in social media (case of freelancer groups). Conference of Open Innovations Association, FRUCT, 25: 204—210.
27. Maltseva, A. V., Shilkina, N. E., Gurieva, S. D. (2024). Motivation to win in fiction and journalistic literature about sports. Theory and practice of physical culture, 2: 84—86. (In Russ.).
28. Maltseva, A., Shilkina, N., Matveev, M. (2021). Topic modeling of russian-language texts using the parts-of-speech composition of topics (on the example of volunteer movement semantics in social media). Conference of Open Innovations Association, FRUCT, 29: 247—253. DOI: 10.23919/FRUCT52173.2021.9435475.
29. Mikhailov, V. A. (2009). On the discussion of the problem of Russian identity. Bulletin of the Russian Nation, 5: 46—57. (In Russ.).
30. Mukomel, V. I. (2016). Crimean Tatars after the Crimean Spring: transformation of identities. Monitoring public opinion: economic and social changes, 3: 50—67. (In Russ.).
31. Plotnikov, D. S. (2018). Language policy as a tool for constructing identity (on the example of Moldova, Ukraine and Latvia). Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Social sciences, 1: 60—81. (In Russ.).
32. Polezhaev, D. V. (2023). Sociological aspects of the “identity matrix”: structural and functional features and value-semantic constants. Primo Aspectu, 3: 9—16. DOI: 10.35211/2500-2635-2023-3-55-9-16. (In Russ.).
33. Polezhaev, D. V. (2023). The ecosophical meanings of the “matrix of civil identity” Russia in the segment “Nature. Ecology. The Animal world”. Questions of social theory, 15: 154—163. (In Russ.).
34. Polezhaev, D. V. (2024). Moral and patriotic education: the national and state aspect of the formation of the all-Russian civic identity. Scientific Notes of the Komsomolsk-onAmur State Technical University, 4: 20—26. DOI: 10.18101/1994-0866-2024-440-47. (In Russ.).
35. Polyushkevich, O. A. (2022). A new identity in modern patriotic cinema. Humanitarian vector, 17 (2): 192—202. DOI: 10.21209/1996-7853-2022-17-2-192-202. (In Russ.).
36. Polyushkevich, O. A. (2023). Morality and social identity in prosocial practices. Sociology, 1: 79—85. (In Russ.).
37. Prosekov, A. Yu., Gritskevich, T. I., Leukhova, M. G. (2022). Cognitive and regional identity as the basis for strategizing innovative educational activities of higher education. Strategizing: theory and practice, 2 (3): 304—318. DOI: 10.21603/2782-24352022-2-3-304-318. (In Russ.).
38. Rusakova, O. F. (2023). The discourse of the state policy of memory as a factor in the formation of national identity in modern Russia. The discourse is Pi, 20 (2): 32—51. DOI: 10.17506/18179568_2023_20_2_32. (In Russ.).
39. Ryzhova, S. V. (2022). Russian identity in regional diversity: the role of trust. Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, 13 (3): 13—31. DOI: 10.19181/vis.2022.13.3.828. (In Russ.).
40. Safonova, M. A. (2012). Network structure and identities in the local community of sociologists. Sociological research, 6: 107—120. (In Russ.).
41. Salikhov, G. G. (2011). The problem of identity in the context of globalization. Century of Globalization, 1: 122—129. (In Russ.).
42. Semenenko, I. S. (2016). Identity politics and identity in politics: ethnonational perspectives, European context. Polis. Political research, 4: 8—28. (In Russ.).
43. Seredkina, N. N. (2022). All—Russian civil identity as a factor of integration of society. Siberian Anthropological Journal, 6 (2): 125—135. DOI: 10.31804/2542-1816-2022-62-125-135. (In Russ.).
44. Silantieva, M. V. (2012). Diffuse identity — a modern version of civic identity. Bulletin of MGIMO University, 2: 173—179. (In Russ.).
45. Skvortsov, N. G. (2016). Social inequality in Russia: challenges to national identity. Humanities, socio-economic and social sciences, 10: 95—102. (In Russ.).
46. Social identity, self-categorization and group. Foreign psychology, 2 (2): 8—17. (In Russ.).
47. Sultanov, K. V. (2012). Socio-cultural identity of youth as a philosophical problem. Society. Wednesday. Development, 1: 116—120. (In Russ.).
48. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis. Engish in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 260 p.
49. Tikhonovich, M. I., Matveeva, M. S. (2022). The specifics of civic identity and patriotism in modern Russia. Personal autonomy, 2: 55—62. (In Russ.).
50. Tishina, E. V., Zakharova, M. A., Kalinina, M. V. (2025). Attitudes Toward Ethical and Communicative Norms in Student Group Chats: Findings from a Sociolinguistic Survey. Nauchnyi dialog, 14 (3): 81—100. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-3-81-100. (In Russ.).
51. Titov, V. V. (2019). Political technologies for the formation of national and state identity in modern Russia. Bulletin of the Trans-Baikal State University, 25 (3): 78—83. DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2019-25-3-78-83. (In Russ.).
52. Tlostanova, M. V. (2010). Multiple identity in the context of the concept of transculturation. Personality. Culture. Society, 12 (4): 142—156. (In Russ.).
53. Urtmintseva, M. G. (2025). Epistolary Genre in Works of Maxim Gorky: Correspondence with V. F. Khodasevich (1924—1925). Nauchnyi dialog, 14 (3): 249—266. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-3-249-266 (In Russ.).
54. Vendina, O. I. (2012). Moscow identity and the identity of Muscovites. Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The series is geographical, 5: 27—39. (In Russ.).
55. Vereshchagina, A. V., Gafiatulina, N. H., Samygin, S. I. (2015). Spiritual aspects of the formation of national identity: a sociological analysis of threats to social health and spiritual security of Russia. Engineering Bulletin of the Don, 3: P. 59. (In Russ.).
56. Vikulova, L. G., Korolenko, O. I., Tkachenko, Yu. G. (2024). Discourse of Self-Presentation in Academic Communicative Space. Nauchnyi dialog, 13 (10): 9—27. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-10-9-27 (In Russ.).
57. Vinogradova, E. V. (2023). On certain issues of the formation of the Russian constitutional identity. Legal science: history and modernity, 8: 97—101. DOI: 10.17072/19954190-2022-55-22-47. (In Russ.).
58. Volkov, Yu. G., Kurbatov, V. I. (2022). Hybrid identity: factors of formation and forms of manifestation. Humanities of the South of Russia, 11 (2): 15—23. DOI: 10.18522/22278656.2022.2.1. (In Russ.).
59. Zadorin, I. V. (2018). Regions of the “frontier”: territorial identity and perception of “specialness”. Politics: Analysis. The chronicle. Prognosis (Journal of Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics), 2: 102—136. (In Russ.).
60. Zamyatina, N. Y. (2012). Territorial identities and social structures. Social Sciences and modernity, 5: 151—163. (In Russ.).
61. Zhade, Z. A. (2022). Identity politics in the regional dimension: the case of the Republic of Adygea. Society: politics, economics, law, 8: 13—18. DOI: 10.24158/pep.2022.8.1. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Shilkina N.E., Maltseva A.V., Gurieva S.D. “We-Identity” Discourse in Academic Communications and Favored Groups of 21st Century Russia. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(7):161-181. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-7-161-181
Views:
21
Email this article 