Academician Bayer on Rus’ and Russia: Figurative Language in Scholarly and Poetic Texts
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-8-161-180
Abstract
This study examines the individual style of Academician Gottlieb Siegfried Bayer (1694–1738) of the Imperial Academy of Sciences, who composed his scholarly works in Latin. The investigation focuses on the features of the 18th-century scientific style, which differed significantly from modern academic Russian and allowed authors to construct rhetorically effective, elegant, and artistically expressive prose. The primary sources for this analysis are Bayer’s scholarly article “De Russorum prima expeditione Constantinopolitana” and his poetic work “Ad Petrum Secundum Augustum imperatorem totius Russiae et autocratora patrem Patria, cum insigna Imperii sanctissimis caeremoniis Moscvae capesseret”. Bayer’s language in his writings on Russia is explored in two key aspects: first, the paper demonstrates how elements of literary speech manifest in his scientific language; second, it analyzes the academician’s explicitly artistic, poetic output through an examination of a fragment from an ode dedicated to Emperor Peter II. The findings indicate that metaphors in Bayer’s scholarly text form coherent figurative patterns and are grounded in the inner form of words, whereas in his poetic text, they become extended and elevate to the level of allegory. The study concludes that a defining characteristic of Bayer’s individual style is his precise consideration of historical and textual context, which is reflected in his deliberate choice of words with a specific inner form.
Keywords
Gottlieb Siegfried Bayer,
Latin language,
Classical Latin poetry,
metaphor,
ode,
Imperial Academy of Sciences
Supporting agencies: The study is supported by Russian Science Foundation, project number 23-28-01692 “The Peoples of Eastern Europe and the Early History of Ancient Rus in the scientific heritage of Gottlieb Siegfried Bayer”, https://www.rscf.ru/project/23-28-01692/
About the Authors
E. S. Ryabtseva
Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina S. Ryabtseva, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Department of the Russian for Foreign Students
Yekaterinburg
S. O. Goryaev
Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin; Missionary Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey O. Goryaev, PhD in Philology, associate professor
Yekaterinburg
References
1. Alpatov, M. A. (1985). Russian historical thought and Western Europe (XVIII — the first half of the XIX century). Moscow: Nauka Publ. 271 p. (In Russ.).
2. Anisimova, I. N., Nikitina, A. Y., Petrova, O. A. (2017). Metaphor as a key element of the linguistic and cognitive level of the linguistic personality of a politician of the XVIII century. In: I. A. Baudouin de Courtenay and world linguistics. Proceedings and materials of the International Conference. Kazan: Kazan University Publishing House. 13—16. ISBN 978-5-00019-878-0. (In Russ.).
3. Borovsky, Ya. M. (1991). Latin as the international language of science (on the history of the issue). In: Problems of the international auxiliary language. Moscow: [b. i.]. 70—76. (In Russ.).
4. Buzykina, I. N. (2020). Roman virtues in the Christian context (based on St. Augustine’s treatise “On the City of God”). Concept: philosophy, religion, culture, 4 (3): 62—75. DOI: 10.24833/2541-8831-2020-3-15-62-75. (In Russ.).
5. Conze, E. (2016). The Principle of Contradiction. On the Theory of Dialectical Materialism. Lanham: Lexington Books. Available at: https://books.google.ru/books?id=XQT1DAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Conze,+E.+The+Principle+of+Contradiction&hl=ru&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Conze%2C%20E.%20The%20Principle%20of%20Contradiction&f=false (accessed 24.08.2025).
6. Erokhina, T. V. (2011). German academic historians of the XVIII century in Russian science: assessments from the standpoint of pre-revolutionary historiography. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University, 9 (224): 129—136. (In Russ.).
7. Frolov, E. D. (2006). Russian science of antiquity: historiographical essays. Saint Petersburg: Academy of Humanities. 604 p. ISBN 5-93762-051-8. (In Russ.).
8. Goryaev, S. O., Ryabtseva, E. S. (2024). Gottlieb Siegfried Bayer and Classical Latin Poetry in Scholarly Debate on Early History of Ancient Rus. Nauchnyi dialog, 13 (7): 28—48. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-7-28-48. (In Russ.).
9. Ignatova, N. Y., Dokuchaev, S. V. (2020). Scientific practices and descriptive languages in Russia of the XVIII century (on the example of V. N. Tatishchev’s amateur studies). Bulletin of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, 4: 56—65. DOI: 10.37482/2227-6564-V034. (In Russ.).
10. Iodko, O. V. (2019). The Petersburg trace of Gottlieb (Theophilus) Siegfried Bayer (1694— 1738). In: Germans in St. Petersburg: A biographical aspect. XVIII—XX centuries, 12. St. Petersburg: MAE RAS. 524 p. (In Russ.).
11. Komyshkova, A. D., Sudakova, A. P. (2018). Subjective modality of the scientific text of the XVIII century: on the formation of the specifics of the scientific style of the Russian language. Ecology of language and communicative practice, 2: 55— 61. DOI: 10.17516/2311-3499-016. (In Russ.).
12. Miller, G. F. (2006). Selected works. Moscow: Janus-K.; Moscow Textbooks and Cartolithography. 816 p. ISBN 5-8037-0327-3. (In Russ.).
13. Morozova, S. A. (2023). Metaphor and comparison as a means of argumentation (based on the German codes of conduct of the XVIII century. Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 2 (28): 89—95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18454/RULB.2023.38.16. (In Russ.).
14. Mukhin, S. V., Inozemtseva, S. V. (2022). Phraseological representation of the “trap” image in the Vespasian psalter. Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 2 (857): 103—109. DOI: 10.52070/2542-2197_2022_2_857_103. (In Russ.).
15. Ospovat, K. A. (2020). Court literature: the Institute of literature and the construction of absolutism in Russia in the middle of the XVIII century. Moscow: New Literary Review. 477 p. ISBN 9785444814055. (In Russ.).
16. Smyshlyaeva, V. P. (2001). Linear organization of the language of Roman elegy (Rhythmic, grammatical and syntactic aspects of poetic word order). Doct. Diss. Moscow. 364 p. (In Russ.).
17. Solomonovskaya, A. L. (2022). Metaphorical conceptualization of translation and translator in para- and metatexts: “dead” and “living” metaphors. Bulletin of the NSU. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural communication, 20 (2): 126—139. DOI: 10.25205/1818-7935-2022-20-2-126-139. (In Russ.).
18. Sverdlov, M. B. (2011). M. V. Lomonosov and the formation of historical science in Russia. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya. 916 p. ISBN 9-785-98187-866-4. (In Russ.).
19. Tatishchev, V. N. (1769). Russian history from the most ancient times: in 5 volumes, 1 (2). Moscow: Publishing House of the Imperial Moscow University. 393—424. (In Russ.).
20. Vtorushin, M. I. (2023). The Varangian question in the light of the concept of a social contract. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. History, 68 (1): 159—175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu02.2023.109. (In Russ.).
21. Zagoskin, N. P. (1899). The history of the law of the Russian people. Lectures and research on the history of Russian law, 1. Kazan: Tipo-lit. Imp. unt-ta. 512 p. (In Russ.).
22. Zvirevich, V. T. (2003). The Roman way of life and its values in the view of Cicero. In: Issedon — IΣΣΕΔΩΝ: An almanac on ancient history and culture, 2. Yekaterinburg: Ural State University Publishing House. 111—123. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Ryabtseva E.S., Goryaev S.O. Academician Bayer on Rus’ and Russia: Figurative Language in Scholarly and Poetic Texts. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(8):161-180. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-8-161-180
Views:
45
Email this article 