Abolition of Courts of Conscience in Russian Empire: A Study of Causality
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-8-549-567
Abstract
This article offers a comprehensive analysis of the reasons for the phased abolition of the Courts of Conscience (sovestnye sudy) in the Russian Empire during the 1820s to 1850s. The source base includes administrative records from the collections of the Russian State Historical Archive, legislative acts of the Russian Empire from the first half of the nineteenth century, and contemporary memoirs. The novelty of this research lies in its focus on a subject that has hitherto been largely overlooked in the historiography, thereby filling a significant gap in the scholarly literature. Furthermore, the study introduces into academic discourse a substantial body of previously unexamined archival documents. The author concludes that the formal justifications for the abolition of the Courts of Conscience served merely as a pretext for their closure as independent judicial institutions. It is argued that the root cause of their abolition was intrinsically linked to their unique character. The article emphasizes that within the context of the growing dominance of legal positivism — a philosophy embraced by the senior officials of the Ministry of Justice — the distinctive, equity-focused nature of the Courts of Conscience rendered them incompatible with the Russian legal framework of the pre-reform era, which was predominantly based on the principles of formalistic legal proceedings.
About the Author
S. N. Podlesnykh
Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies named after G. F. Morozov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey N. Podlesnykh, PhD in Law, Department of Social Sciences and Humanities
Voronezh
References
1. Andreeva, T. V. (2019). M. M. Speransky’s note on the establishment of the Committee on December 6, 1826. St. Petersburg Historical Magazine, 4 (24): 253—272. (In Russ.).
2. Balina, O. G. (2016). The policy of Alexander I and the “Enlightenment reforms” in Russia in the first quarter of the 19th century. Culture. Spirituality. Society, 22: 24—36. (In Russ.).
3. Baranov, Yu. V. (2020). Judicial practice of the Moscow Conscience Court (1782—1861). Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Jurisprudence, 1: 67—73. (In Russ.).
4. Barats, G. M. (1893). An essay on the origin and gradual subsequent abolition of conscientious courts and courts of conscience in Russia: A historical and legal study. St. Petersburg: [b. i.]. 40 p. (In Russ.).
5. Frolova, E. A. (2013). Theory of natural law (historical and theoretical aspect). Bulletin of the Moscow University. Episode 11: The Law, 2: 71—77. (In Russ.).
6. Ilyukhina, V. A., Agafonov, S. Yu. (2024). Institute of the conscientious court in the Russian Empire (1775—1852). Historical and legal problems: a new perspective, 1: 23— 32. DOI: 10.24412/2309-152-2024-1-23-32. (In Russ.).
7. Korkunov, N. M. (1895). The project of the Supreme Court of Conscience in the twenties (historical reference). Journal of the Ministry of Justice, 4: 135—138. (In Russ.).
8. Levitsky, S. A. (2011). The tragedy of freedom. Minsk: Publishing House of the Belarusian Exarchate. P. 480. (In Russ.).
9. Markova-Murashova, S. A. (2013). Evolution of types of legal understanding in the context of the genesis of the national legal system of Russia. Proceedings of Tula State University. Economic and legal sciences, 3—2: 39—47. (In Russ.).
10. Matyushenko, Z. G. (2013). Positivism in Russia: an early stage. Izvestiya MGTU MAMI, 2 / 4 (18): 34—41. (In Russ.).
11. Migunova, T. L. (2007). The conscientious court of Catherine II. Law and Law, 2: 116—121. (In Russ.).
12. Naumov, I. M. (1830). My thoughts on the conscientious court and appreciation for the memory of the Most Reverend. Metropolitan Ambrose. St. Petersburg: Tip. Gl. upr. ways of communication. 22 p. (In Russ.).
13. Plekh, O. A. (2020). The composition of the bureaucracy of the Olonets province in the first half of the 19th century. Scientific notes of Petrozavodsk State University, 42 (2): 58—69. DOI: 10.15393/uchz.art.2020.450. (In Russ.).
14. Podlesnykh, S. N. (2024). B. Astrakhan Conscience Court: the history of joining the Criminal and Civil Court Chamber (1828). Electronic journal “Kavkazologiya”, 4: 40—53. DOI: 10.31143/2542-212X-2024-4-40-53. (In Russ.).
15. Podlesnykh, S. N. (2024). Conscientious courts in the Russian Empire as an alternative to formal legal proceedings: 1775—1866. Nauchnyi dialog, 13 (10): 445—462. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-10-445-462. (In Russ.).
16. Podlesnykh, S. N. (2025). On the issue of the reasons for the closure of the Olonets Conscience Court. Scientific Notes of Petrozavodsk State University, 47 (4): 52—56. DOI: 10.15393/uchz.art.2025.1182. (In Russ.).
17. Pravkin, S. A. (2015). Evolution of the positivist and sociological approach in Russian jurisprudence of the second half of the XIX — early XX century. Approbation, 4 (31): 97—103. (In Russ.).
18. Smykalin, A. S. (2017). Comparison of the conscientious court of Catherine II and the English court of Chancellor. In: Tools of modern scientific activity: a collection of articles based on the results of International scientific and practical research. Conferences: at 2 a.m., 2. Izhevsk: Agency for International Studies LLC. 150—153. (In Russ.).
19. Starikova, N. V. (2013). The Conscience court in the judicial system of Catherine II (based on the materials of the Nizhny Novgorod province). Bulletin of Mininsky University, 4 (4): P. 6. (In Russ.).
20. Suzdaleva, T. R., Fedorov, K. V. (2015). V. N. Panin, Opponent of judicial reform in 1864. Humanitarian Bulletin, 1 (27): 1—11. (In Russ.).
21. Sverdlova, L. M. (2013). Kazan Conscience Court as a court of reconciliation initiative. From the history and culture of the peoples of the Middle Volga region: collection, 3: 214—220. (In Russ.).
22. Trunov, I. A. (2025). Legal positivism and neopositivism (legalism): theoretical and methodological features. Bulletin of Science, 1 / 6 (87): 882—886. (In Russ.).
23. Uporov, I. V. (2024). Liberal ideas in the Russian Empire during the time of Catherine II and Alexander I. Trends in the development of science and education, 114—3: 82—86. DOI: 10.18411/trnio-10-2024-112. (In Russ.).
24. Vereshchagin, A. N. (2023). The Senate of Cassation (1866—1917). Essays on the structure and activities of the Supreme Court of the Russian Empire. Moscow: Publishing group “The LAW”. 616 p. (In Russ.).
25. Voropanov, V. A. (2010). The practice of conscientious courts in the Urals and Western Siberia (late XVIII — first half of the XIX centuries). Scientific Bulletin of the Ural Academy of Public Administration: Political Science, Economics, sociology, law, 2 (11): 126—130. (In Russ.).
26. Yemelyanov, B. V. (2015). Tsarism against natural law (three episodes of persecution). Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Episode 17. Philosophy. Conflictology. Cultural studies. Religious studies, 4: 119—126. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Podlesnykh S.N. Abolition of Courts of Conscience in Russian Empire: A Study of Causality. Nauchnyi dialog. 2025;14(8):549-567. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2025-14-8-549-567
Views:
63
Email this article 