Anniversaries and Obituaries as Tools for Constructing Corporate Identity at Timiryazev Academy (1865–1925)

Based on a multidisciplinary approach integrating methodologies from historical anthropology, sociolinguistics, and memory studies, this article investigates the role of anniversary and obituary publications in shaping corporate identity within Petrovskaia (Timiryazev) Agricultural Academy between 1865 and 1925. Through an analysis of representative texts from specialized, socio-political, and mass-circulation publications, mechanisms are revealed for constructing the academy’s pantheon of glory. A tripartite pattern of esteem emerges, combining values of advanced science, free-thinking, and service to society. The evolution of commemorative strategies is traced — from cautious self-representation during the 1890 jubilee celebration to deeper historical introspection and integration into national context by 1915. Special attention is given to the process of academic canonization of key figures (K.A. Timiryazev, I.A. Stebut et al.) whose biographies in obituaries acquired traits reminiscent of secular hagiography. The work argues for both conceptual stability and flexibility in established rituals of remembrance, which not only survived changes in political regimes but successfully adapted to ideological demands under Soviet power, ensuring symbolic continuity and preservation of the academy's historical reputation amidst shifting sociocultural conditions.

1. Anniversary of the Honored Professor I. A. Stebut. (1923). In: Izvestiya Severo-Zapadnogo upravleniya S.-H. opytnoe delo, I—II. Petrograd: [b. i.]. P. 36. (In Russ.).

2. Bondarenko, P. P., Tokin, B. P., Uspensky, E. E. (1936). In memory of K. A. Timiryazev [Text]: Collection of reports and materials of the session of the K. A. Timiryazev Biological Institute dedicated to the 15th anniversary of K. A. Timiryazev’s death. 1920—1935.

3. Moscow; Leningrad: Biomedgiz. 315 p. (In Russ.).

4. Brownov, P. I. (1904). Modern issues of Russian agriculture: towards the 50th anniversary. anniversary of I. A. Stebut. St. Petersburg: Publishing house of admirers and students of I. A. Strebut. 578 p. (In Russ.).

5. Bukina, T. G. (2020). Obituary as a biographical genre: a etiquette and pragmatic aspect. Proceedings of the Ural Federal University, Series 1, Problems of Education, Science and Culture, 26 / 2 (197): 35—41. DOI: 10.15826/izv1.2020.26.2.028. (In Russ.).

6. Fortunatov, A. F. (1904). Ivan Aleksandrovich Stebut (on the fiftieth anniversary of his activity). 1854—1904. Moscow: O. L. Somovoy Publishing House. 9 p. (In Russ.).

7. Fortunatov, A. F. (1915). From the history of the Petrovsky Academy. Bulletin of Europe, 10: 40—52. (In Russ.).

8. Fortunatov, A. F. (1921). A few words about M. M. Shchepkin. Bulletin of Agriculture, 7: P. 2. (In Russ.).

9. Khazagerov, G. G., Shchemeleva, E. Y. (2015). The problem of creating the image of a scientist in jubilee materials. Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice, 4 (46) / 2: 203—206. (In Russ.).

10. Klingen, I. N. (1904). Ivan Aleksandrovich Stebut. Modern issues of Russian agriculture, 28: XI—LI. (In Russ.).

11. Kovalchenko, I. D. (1965). The centenary of the Petrovsky Agricultural Academy and the development of agrarian science in Russia. Russian history, 4: P. 112. (In Russ.).

12. Lotman, Yu. M. (2000). Semiosphere [Collection]. Saint Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPB. 703 p. ISBN 5-210-01562-9. (In Russ.).

13. Lunkevich, V. V. (1926). Where and how did the human race come from the origin of man. Leningrad: Rudiments of Knowledge. 80 p. (In Russ.).

14. Nikitashina, S. O. (2017). Obituaries about scientist I. V. Mushketov as a historical source. In: Document in modern society: between the past and the future: abstracts of the X AllRussian Student Scientific and Practical Conference, Yekaterinburg, April 7—8, 2017. Yekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House. 348—351. ISBN 978-5-7996-1932-9. (In Russ.).

15. Reitblat, A. I., Dushenko, K. V. (2015). Obituary as a biographical genre. Bulletin of Cultural Studies, 2: 69—71. (In Russ.).

16. Repina, L. P., Vorobyeva, O. V., Ivanova, T. N., Kirillova, E. N. (2017). International scientific conference “History, memory, identity: theoretical foundations and research practices”. Dialogue with time, 59: 382—395. (In Russ.).

17. Shchepkin, D. M. (1910). Mitrofan Pavlovich Shchepkin: An essay on activity. Moscow: Type. The island of R. P. books, the successor of V. I. Voronov. 73 p. (In Russ.).

18. Sobichevsky, V. T. (1899). The memory of M. K. Tursky. St. Petersburg: Tip. SPb. city government. 13 p. (In Russ.).

19. The past: a historical almanac, 10. (1990, 1992). Moscow: Progress: Phoenix. 510 p. (In Russ.).

20. Turner, V. W. (1991). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. New York: Cоrnell University Press. 224 p.

21. Vernadsky, V. I. (1920). In memory of K. A. Timiryazev as a citizen and scientist. Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences, XIV: P. 95. (In Russ.).

22. Yevtushenko, A. G. (2012). Jubilee as a key to understanding the spiritual aspirations of the nation. Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Culture and Arts, 1 (45): 93—96. (In Russ.).