Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Implication Techniques for ConstImplication techniques for constructing texts of modern youth media through the prism of rhetorical traditionructing Texts of Modern Youth Media through the Prism of Rhetorical Tradition

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-12-99-110

Abstract

The principles of text construction and infl on the youth audience of modern mass media are considered on the example of the radio station “New Radio”. The question is raised about the relevance of the use in the modern virtual space of the classical technology of text generation, based on Greco-Roman rhetoric. The results of a comparative analysis of the technology of generating a text in the periods of antiquity and the revival of this technology in the “new rhetoric” of the second half of the twentieth century is presented in the article. The relevance of the study is due to the observed diversifi of the media, which is becoming more prominent in youth media: the distribution of content on social networks allows each media to become more specialized and coordinate content with the needs of the target audience. The novelty of the research is seen in the fact that the author considers the content of modern media as a corpus of entimematic argumentation, which allows one to deduce the large premises of the syllogism eliminated into implication. The novelty of the research is in the fact that the author considers the content of modern media as a corpus of entimematic argumentation, which allows one to deduce the large premises of the syllogism eliminated into implication. Particular attention is paid to the axiology of a set of enthymemes that the target audience can potentially restore.

About the Author

O. V. Murzina
Kosygin State University of Russia
Russian Federation

Olga V. Murzina, PhD in Pedagogics, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Journalism and Television Technologies

Moscow



References

1. Anisimov, R. Yu., Kudimova, O. S. (2019). Sredstva obedineniya auditorii v politicheskom mediynom diskurse [Means of uniting the audience in political media discourse]. Kazanskaya nauka [Kazan science], 1: 7—9. (In Russ.).

2. Annushkin, V. I. (2016). Istoriya russkoy ritoriki [History of Russian rhetoric]. Moskva: Flinta. 416 p. ISBN 978-5-89349-244-6. (In Russ.).

3. Aristotel’. (2015). Ritorika. Ne ubezhdat’, no v kazhdom otdelnom sluchaye nakhodit’ sposoby ubezhdeniya [Rhetoric. Not to convince, but in each individual case to find ways to convince]. Moskva: Eksmo Press. 256 p. ISBN 978-5-699-82974-3. (In Russ.).

4. Armstrong, C. L., McAdams, M. J., Cain, J. Hazy habits: What kinds of news do young people want? Available at: http://swecjmc.wp.txstate.edu/files/2016/04/Armstrong.pdf (accessed 10.09.2020).

5. Auditoriya sotsialnykh setey v Rossii 2019 [Audience of social networks in Russia 2019]. Available at: https://popsters.ru/blog/post/auditoriya-socsetey-v-rossii (accessed 10.09.2020). (In Russ.).

6. Baume, M. 10 Ways to Attract Younger News Consumers. Available at: https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2010/10-ways-to-attract-younger-news-consumers/ (accessed 10.09.2020).

7. Bezmenova, N. A. (1991). Ocherki po teorii i istorii ritoriki [Essays on the theory and history of rhetoric]. Moskva: Nauka. 158 p. (In Russ.).

8. Bogdanova, A. A. (2016). Tipologiya molodezhnykh SMI. Sovremennoye sostoyaniye molodezhnykh SMI [Typology of youth media. Current state of youth media]. In: Skorinovskiye chteniya 2016: kniga kak fenomen kultury, iskusstva, tekhnologii: materialy II Mezhdunarodnogo foruma, 6—7 sentyabrya 2016 g [Skarinovsky readings 2016: book as a phenomenon of culture, art, technology: materials of the II International forum, September 6—7, 2016]. Minsk: BGTU. 98—101. (In Russ.).

9. Clarke, M. L. (1953). Rhetoric at Rome. A Historical Survey. London: Cohen & West ltd. The University Press, Glasgow. 213 p.

10. Cossutta, F. (1984). Gli Umanisti e la Retorica. Roma: Università degli studi di Trieste, facoltà di lettere e filosofia. a, Edizioni dell’ateneo. 230 p. (In Ital).

11. Daniel’, M. A. Yavlyaetsya li inklyuziv mestoimeniem pervogo litsa? (terminologicheskiy ekskurs v tipologicheskoy perspektive) [Is an inclusive first-person pronoun? (terminological digression in typological perspective)]. Available at: http://www.philol.msu.ru/~otipl/new/main/articles/daniel/Daniel%20Inclusive.pdf (accessed 10.09.2020). (In Russ.).

12. Dzhokhadze, D. V. (1971). Dialektika Aristotelya [Dialectics Of Aristotle]. Moskva: Nauka. 264 p. (In Russ.).

13. Harris, L. B. How young adults define ‘news’: 7 good questions with Data & Society’s Mary Madden. Available at: https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/good-questions/young-adults-news-mary-madden/ (accessed 12.09.2020).

14. Murphy, Z. Beyond 800 Words: What User Testing Taught Me About Writing News for Young People. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/blog/2018-12-news-user-testing-youngpeople (accessed 102.09.2020).

15. Pasternak, E. L. (2002). «Ritorika» Bernara Lami v istorii frantsuzskoy filologii [“Rhetoric” of Bernard Lamy in the history of French Philology]. Moskva: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury. 328 p. ISBN 5-94457-069-5. (In Russ.).

16. Perelman, Ch., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). The New Rhetoric. A Treatise On Argumentation. London: Notre Dame Press. 508 p.

17. Poyntz, S. R., Pedri, J. (2018). Youth and Media Culture. Available at: http://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-75 (accessed 10.09.2020).

18. Quintilian, M. F. Institutio Oratoria. Available at: http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Quintilian/Institutio_Oratoria/home.html (accessed 12.09.2020).

19. Rosenstiel, T., Sonderman, J., Loker, K., Worthington, L., Swanson, E., Sterett, D., Benz, J., Tompson, T. Breaking Down The Millenial Generation: A Typology Of Young News Consumers. Available at: http://www.mediainsight.org/PDFs/Typology/MillennialTypologyFinal.pdf (accessed 12.09.2020).

20. Shuyskaya, Yu. V. (2017). Dinamika ritoricheskoy dispozitsii ot antichnosti do nashikh dney [Dynamics of rhetorical disposition from antiquity to the present day]. Kultura i tsivilizatsiya [Culture and civilization], 1: 301—309. (In Russ.).

21. Suslova, O. V. (2018). Molodezhnyye izdaniya v sovremennoy Rossii [Youth publications in modern Russia]. Moskva: Norma. 316 p. (In Russ.).

22. Zubov, V. P. (1960). K istorii russkogo oratorskogo iskusstva kontsa XVII — pervoy poloviny XVIII v. (russkaya lyullianskaya literatura i yeye naznacheniye) [On the history of Russian oratory of the late XVII — first half of the XVIII century. (Russian lullian literature and its purpose)]. In: Trudy otdela drevnerusskoy literatury [Proceedings of the Department of old Russian literature], 16: Moskva—Leningrad: Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. 288—303. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Murzina O.V. Implication Techniques for ConstImplication techniques for constructing texts of modern youth media through the prism of rhetorical traditionructing Texts of Modern Youth Media through the Prism of Rhetorical Tradition. Nauchnyi dialog. 2020;(12):99-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-12-99-110

Views: 913


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)