Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Reform of the Zemstvo Representation: Development and Adjustment of P. A. Stolypin Project in 1906—1907.

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-12-322-334

Abstract

The article is devoted to the little-studied issue of the development and adjustment of the reform provisions of the zemstvo representation of P.A. Stolypin in 1906—1907. The main programmatic requirements of liberal circles to change the procedure for elections to zemstvo assemblies, developed by zemstvo assemblies, zemstvo congresses, as well as local committees of the Special Meeting on the needs of the agricultural industry. For the first time, on the materials of the Russian State Historical Archive, the evolution of the provisions of the draft and their criticism in the Council of Ministers, as well as at the Congress of the United Nobility in 1907, is shown. It is emphasized that the development of the reform was a consequence of the Manifesto adopted in 1903 and 1904 and the decree on the need to transform local government and self-government. The author states that initially P. A. Stolypin sought to increase the share of representatives from cities and commercial and industrialists in zemstvo assemblies, however, at the insistence of the Council of Ministers, he was forced to retain the majority for landowners. The criticism of the united nobility in relation to the reform in connection with the expansion of the circle of voters and the organization of elections at the beginning of the non-class is highlighted in the article. It is concluded that the transformation of elections into zemstvo assemblies, planned by P. A. Stolypin was aimed at involving broad strata of the population in the representative institutions of local self-government at the expense of an unclassified beginning and the organization of elections based on a tax qualification.

About the Author

A. A. Sorokin
National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Russian Federation

Alexander A. Sorokin, PhD in History, Senior Lecturer

ResearcherID АAG-4186-2020

Nizhny Novgorod



References

1. Barinova, E. P. (2002). Vlast’ i pomestnoe dvoryanstvo Rossii v nachale XX veka [Power and local nobility of Russia at the beginning of the 20th century]. Samara. 364 p. (In Russ.).

2. Kabytov, P. S. (2007). P. A. Stolypin: posledniy reformator rossiyskoy imperii [P. A. Stolypin: the last reformer of the Russian empire]. Moskva: ROSSPEN. 190 p. (In Russ.).

3. Kabytov, P. S., Barinova, E. P. (2019). Petr Arkad’evich Stolypin i rossiyskoe dvoryanstvo [Pyotr Arkadievich Stolypin and the Russian nobility]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4. Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Science Journal of VolSU. History. Area Studies. International Relations], 24 (3): 79—91. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu4.2019.3.7. (In Russ.).

4. Kazanina, L. Yu. (2012). Stolypinskie reformy v otsenke obshchestvennogo mneniya (1906—1911) [Stolypin reforms in assessing public opinion (1906—1911)]. Moskva. 371 p. (In Russ.).

5. Koroleva, N. G. (1982). Pervaya rossiyskaya revolyutsiya i tsarizm. Sovet ministrov Rossii v 1905— 1907 gg. [The first Russian revolution and tsarism. Council of Ministers of Russia in 1905—1907]. Moskva: Nauka. 184 p. (In Russ.).

6. Kulikov, V. V. (2002). Stanovlenie i razvitie zemskogo samoupravleniya, vtoraya polovina XIX — nachalo XX vv.: istoriko-yuridicheskoe issledovanie: Doct. Diss. [Formation and development of zemstvo self-government, second half of 19th — early 20th centuries: historical and legal research. Doct. Diss.]. Moskva. 461 p. (In Russ.).

7. Manning, R. T. (1982). The crisis of the old order in Russia. Gentry and government. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 555 p.

8. Mogilevskiy, K. I. (2008). Stolypinskie reformy i mestnaya elita: Sovet po delam mestnogo khozyaystva (1908—1910) [Stolypin Reforms and the Local Elite: Council for Local Economy Affairs (1908—1910)]. Moskva: ROSSPEN. 328 p. (In Russ.).

9. Mogilevskiy, K. I. (2011). Opyt sozdaniya otechestvennoy modeli mestnogo samo-upravleniya (vtoraya polovina XIX — nachalo XX veka) [The experience of creating a domestic model of local self-government (second half of the XIX — early XX century)]. Mestnoe pravo, [Local Law]. 3: 11—20. (In Russ.).

10. Mogilevskiy, K. I., Solov’ev, K. A. (2011). P. A. Stolypin: lichnost’ i reformy [P. A. Stolypin: personality and reforms]. (2nd ed.). Moskva: ROSSPEN. 143 p. (In Russ.).

11. Popova, A. V. (2016). Voprosy reformirovaniya mestnogo samoupravleniya v rossiyskoy neoliberalnoy politiko-pravovoy doktrine nachala XX veka [Issues of reforming local selfgovernment in the Russian neoliberal political and legal doctrine of the early 20th century]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law], 2 (230): 39—46. DOI: 10.12737/17642. (In Russ.).

12. Pozhigaylo, P. A. (2007). Stolypinskaya programma preobrazovaniya Rossii (1906—1911) [Stolypin program for the transformation of Russia (1906—1911)]. Moskva : ROSSPEN. 240 p. (In Russ.).

13. Shutov, A. Yu. (1999). Zemskiy izbiratelnyy protsess v Rossii (1864—1917): Doct. Diss. [Zemsky electoral process in Russia (1864—1917). Doct. Diss.]. Moskva. 403 p. (In Russ.).

14. Wcislo, F. W. (1990). Reforming rural Russia: state, local society and national politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 347 p.

15. Weissman, N. B. (1981). Reform in tsarist Russia. The state bureaucracy and local govern-ment, 1900—1914. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. 292 p.


Review

For citations:


Sorokin A.A. Reform of the Zemstvo Representation: Development and Adjustment of P. A. Stolypin Project in 1906—1907. Nauchnyi dialog. 2020;(12):322-334. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-12-322-334

Views: 696


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)