Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Reception of J. Austen’s creativity in Contemporary British Literature (Novel by Joe Baker “Longbourne”)

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-2-189-201

Abstract

The experience of reception of creativity of J. Austen (1775—1817) in modern British literature is analyzed. The aim of the work was to identify the main directions and ideological and artistic functions of the deconstruction of pretext — the novel by J. Austen “Pride and Prejudice” (1813) — in the novel by Joe Baker (born in 1973) “Longbourne” (2013). It was revealed that the social, anti-colonial, anti-imperialist, anti-war, feminist components are the most significant in the deconstruction of pretext. For Baker, the main modes of rethinking the novel by J. Austen “Pride and Prejudice” become relevant in the modern social and cultural situation of revising the past and assessing the present in Britain, the problems of social contradictions, imperialism, colonialism and its consequences, the rights of women and minorities. It was concluded that in his artistic quest, Baker, although using the novel of the Regency era as a pretext, is moving closer to the neo-Victorian novel. It has been substantiated that it is advisable to clarify the definition of the “neo-Victorian novel of the younger generation” (the term by Y. S. Skorokhodko), designating works written in the pre-Victorian era, in particular, in the era of the Regency, as possible plot-forming pretexts, or to single out a new genre variety of British historiographic metanovel (L. Hutchen) — a Neo-Pre-Victorian novel.

About the Author

A. A. Ilunina
Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education “Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies named after G. F. Morozov”
Russian Federation

Anna A. Ilunina, Researcher ID ABG-6711- 2020, PhD in Philology, Associate Professor 

Voronezh



References

1. Alhborn, S. (2017). Jane Austen Enduring Popularity. In: Omnia. University of Pennsilvania, 17 September. Available at: http://omnia.sas.upenn.edu/story/jane-austens-enduring-popularity.html (accessed: 23.12.2020).

2. Fowler, C. (2017). Revisiting Mansfield Park: The Critical and Literary Legacies of Edward W. Said Essay “Jane Austen and Empire” in Culture and Imperialism (1993). The Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry, 4(3): 362—381. DOI: 10.1017/pli.2017.26.

3. Hui-Chun Chang. (2014). The Impact of the Feminist Heroine: Elizabeth in Pride and Prejudice. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3/3: 76—82. DOI: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.3p.76.

4. Kononova, A. S. (2012). Vospriyatiye i pererabotka tvorchestva Dzheyn Osten vo vtoroy polovine XX — nachale XXI veka (ekranizatsii, meshapy, fanfiki) [Perception and processing of Jane Austen’s creativity in the second half of the XX — early XXI century (film adaptations, mashups, fanfiction)]. Vestnik Polotskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya A. Gumanitarnye nauki [Bulletin of Polotsk State University. Series A. Humanities], 10: 25—29. (In Russ.).

5. Makrushina, K. A. (2011). Dzheyn Osten: feminizm i postkolonialnyye issledovaniya [Jane Austen: feminism and postcolonial studies]. Izvestiya Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Gumanitarnye nauki [Bulletin of the Ural State University. Series 2. Humanities], 1 (87): 112—119. (In Russ.).

6. Paliy, A. A. (2011). Nesobstvenno-pryamaya rech' v romanakh Dzheyn Osten kak odno iz proyavleniy ee stilisticheskogo novatorstva [Inappropriately direct speech in the novels of Jane Austen as one of the manifestations of her stylistic innovation]. Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik [Omsk Scientific Bulletin], 5: 136—138. (In Russ.).

7. Povzun, E. V. (2006.). Cherty romantizma i realizma v romane Dzheyn Osten «Gordost’ i predubezhdenie» (1813) [Traits of romanticism and realism in the novel by Jane Austen “Pride and Prejudiceˮ (1813)]. Vesnіk Belaruskaga dzyarzhaўnaga unіversіteta. Seriya 4. Fіlalogіya. Zhurnalіstyka. Pedagogіka [Spring Belarusian dzyarzhaunaga unіversiteta. Series 4. Philology. Journalism. Pedagogy], 1: 29—33. (In Russ.).

8. Remaeva, Yu. G. (2006). Novaya zhenskaya proza Britanii na rubezhe XX i XIX stolentiy [New women's prose of Britain at the turn of the XX and XIX centuries]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta imeni N. I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Filologiya [Bulletin of NI Lobachevsky University of Nizhny Novgorod. Series: Philology], 1: 167—170. (In Russ.).

9. Romanenko, K. R. (2017). Nostalgiya i samoironiya: literaturnyy kult Dzheyn Osten cherez figuru ee fanata [Nostalgia and self-irony: the literary cult of Jane Austen through the figure of her fan]. Logos [Logos], 27/6 (121): 153—172. (In Russ.).

10. Runjiang Xu., Yucheng Li. (2009). Jane Austen and Imperialism: A Rereading of Pride and Prejudice. English Language Teaching, 2/4: 184—187. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v2n4p184.

11. Said, E. (1993). Jane Austen and Empire. In: Culture and Imperialism. London: Vintage. 107—111.

12. Samutina, N. (2017). Emotional Landscapes of reading: Fan Fiction in the Contex of Contemporary Reading Practices. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 20/3. 253—269.

13. Shiller, D. (1997). The redemptive past in the neo-Victorian novel. Studies in the novel, 29/4. 538—560.

14. Skorokhodko, Yu. S. (2015). Neoviktorianskiy roman kak forma intertekstualnogo dialoga s viktorianstvom v angliyskoy literature [Neo-Victorian novel as a form of intertextual dialogue with Victorianism in English literature]. Mirovaya literatura na perekrestye kultur i tsivilizatsiy [World literature at the crossroads of cultures and civilizations], 2 (10): 59—68. (In Russ.).

15. Vishnyakova, N. A., Vishnyakova, V. S. (2014). Roman «Gordost’ i predubezhdeniye» Dzheyn Osten v kontekste sovremennoy massovoy literatury [The novel “Pride and Prejudiceˮ by Jane Austen in the context of modern mass literature]. Mirovaya klassika i molodezhnaya kultura [World classics and youth culture], 2: 143—147. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Ilunina A.A. Reception of J. Austen’s creativity in Contemporary British Literature (Novel by Joe Baker “Longbourne”). Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(2):189-201. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-2-189-201

Views: 755


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)