Chronotope of Russian Works about Robinson
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-5-287-302
Abstract
The results of the study of the chronotope in Russian-language compositions based on the novel about Robinson’s adventures are presented. The material for the work was A. E. Razin’s novel “The Real Robinson” (1860) and Lev Tolstoy’s story “Robinson” (1862). The issues of the specifics of the representation of the chronotopic in the works of Russian writers are considered. The relevance of the study is due to the appeal to the universal of the chronotope, which contains an exhaustive toolkit for the artistic embodiment of images of space and time; as well as the search for new methods of literary analysis of the text. It is shown that in the analyzed texts, a kind of fusion of Russianlanguage compositions with a foreigncultural text in the aspect of a chronotope is realized. The similarities and differences in the rethinking of the story of Robinson are shown on the example of the model of textual connexity, the national specifics of the representation of the image of Robinson are indicated. It is noted that the external and internal chronotopes are retransmitted from work to work and create the basis for the emergence of the author’s intentions. It is proved that chronotopic analysis allows one to form an idea of the peculiarities of the Russian-language interpretation of the story of Robinson.
About the Authors
T. V. Shvetsova
Branch of the M. V. Lomonosov Northern (Arctic) Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana V. Shvetsova —PhD in Philology, Associate Professor Humanitarian
Severodvinsk
V. E. Shakhova
Branch of the M. V. Lomonosov Northern (Arctic) Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Veronika E. Shakhova — Bachelor student Humanitarian Institute
Severodvinsk
References
1. Alekseeva, M. P. (1963). “Robinson Crusoe” in Russian translations. In: Inter-national relations of Russian literature. Collection of the status under the cord. academician M. P. Alekseev. Moscow; Leningrad: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences. 86—100. (In Russ).
2. Amineva, V. R. (2020). Topos of Kazan in Russian Poetry of the Late XX — Early XXI Centuries: Features of Functioning and Poetics. Nauchnyi dialog, 11: 177—192. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2020-11-177-192. (In Russ).
3. Bachmann-Medik, D. (2017). Cultural turns. New guidelines in the sciences of culture. Moscow: New Literary Review. 504 p. ISBN 978-5-4448-0683-8. (In Russ).
4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1975). Questions of literature and aesthetics. Studies of different years. Moscow: Fiction. 504 p. (In Russ).
5. Bryukhanova, Yu. M., Podrezova, N. N. (2020). Chronotope of mail in the “new drama” of the 1990 s. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philology, 67: 204—217. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/67/11. (In Russ).
6. Dergacheva, I. V. (2019). Eschatological chronotope of Fyodor Dostoevsky. Quaestio Rossica, 7 (4): 1143—1159. DOI: 10.15826/qr.2019.4.429. (In Russ).
7. Foucault, M. (1977). Words and things: Archeology of the Humanities. Moscow: Progress. 488 p. (In Russ).
8. Jereza, R., Perrino, S. (2020). «They are just a danger»: Chronotopic worlds in digital narratives of the far-right. Journal of Language and Politics, 19 (5): 809—830. DOI: 10.1075/jlp.19073.jer.
9. Likhachev, D. S. (1987). Poetics of Ancient Russian literature. Selected works in three volumes., 1. Leningrad: Fiction. Leningrad Branch. Available at: http://drevnerus-lit.niv.ru/drevne-rus-lit/lihachev-poetika/hudozhestvennoe-vremya.htm (accessed 02.02.2021). (In Russ).
10. Martynenko, I. V. (2017). “It would be necessary to read the original ...”: Alterations and treatments of the novel by D. Defoe “Robinson Crusoe” (of the memorial library of the Yasnaya Polyana museum-estate). Bibliophiles of Russia, XIII. Moscow: My favorite Russia. 432—454. (In Russ).
11. Matonin, V. N., Bedina, N. N. (2017). Features of the chronotope of Old Believer’s texts about the Solovetsky Uprising. Bulletin of Slavic Cultures, 43 (1): 134—141. (In Russ).
12. Satanar, M. T. (2020). Explication of Some Codes of the Yakut Epos Olonkho Mythological System (Folklore Time and Space). Nauchnyi dialog, 6: 302—319. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2020-6-302-319. (In Russ).
13. Saveleva, V. V. (2002). Artistic text and the artistic world: correlation and organization. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. Almaty: Fund “XXI century”. 48 p. (In Russ).
14. Steele, R. (2010). The story of the amazing adventures of Alexander Selkirk, the shipwrecked sailor. In: Prutskov G. V. Introduction to world journalism. From Antiquity to the end of the XVIII century: Educational and methodological kit (textbook, anthology). Moscow: Aspect Press. 377—381. ISBN 978-5-7567-0578-2. (In Russ).
15. Taylor-Leech, K. (Mar 2020). Timorese talking back: The semiotic construction of chronotopes in the Timor Sea protests. Linguistic Landscape, 6 (1): 29—51. DOI: 10.1075/ll.00016.tay.
16. Toporov, V. N. (1983). Space and text. Text: semantics and structure. Moscow: The Science. 227—284. (In Russ).
17. Torn, A. (Jan 2011). Chronotopes of madness and recovery: A challenge to narrative linearity. Narrative Inquiry, 21 (1): 130—150. DOI: 10.1075/ni.21.1.07tor.
18. Tyupa, V. I. (2001). Art analysis (An introduction to literary analysis). Moscow: Publishing house “Labyrinth”, RSUH. 94—97. ISBN 5-87604-116. (In Russ).
19. Urnov, D. M. (1990). Defo. Moscow: Mol. Gvardiya. 253 p. (In Russ).
Review
For citations:
Shvetsova T.V., Shakhova V.E. Chronotope of Russian Works about Robinson. Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(5):287-302. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-5-287-302
Views:
538
Email this article 