Preview

Nauchnyi dialog

Advanced search

Model for Describing of Speech Genre “Spiritual Essay”: Basic Parameters and Implementation (Theolinguistic Aspect)

https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-10-134-152

Abstract

A parametric model for describing the “essay” speech genre functioning in the church-religious style, which is called spiritual on the basis of its intentional, thematic-content, illocutionary and other features, is presented. The author suggests using the following parameters in the analysis of an essay with spiritual (religious-Christian) content: addresser, addressee, spiritual and religious intentions of the author, spiritual and religious thematic basis of content, composition, argumentation, used Christian images, tactics and strategies, representative linguistic stylistic means, intertextual content. The implementation of this model is shown on the basis of the text «“The effect of proximity” in history and everyday life» written by Archimandrite Makarii (Veretennikov). A spiritual essay is defined as a genre of a church-religious style: a text-reflection created by a clergyman and addressed to a representative of Christian culture, reflecting the personal experiences and impressions of the author. In the final part of the work, it is stated: the spiritual essay is realized as an independent genre and becomes an element of the structure of another genre, for example, writing, diary, etc., that is, it is embodied as an intragenre. The collection of spiritual essays by Archimandrite Savva (Mazuko) “Love and Emptiness” is used for research. The comparative analysis is designed to accurately and convincingly show the specifics of a spiritual essay. 

About the Author

A. N. Smolina
Siberian Federal University
Russian Federation

Andzhella N. Smolina – PhD in Philology, Associate Professor

Krasnoyarsk



References

1. Anisimova, E. E. (2019). Religious discourse: functional and anthropological aspects. Moscow: FGBOU V MGLU. 240 p. ISBN 978-5-00120-058-1. (In Russ.).

2. Bakhtin, M. M. (2013). Aesthetics of verbal creativity. Moscow: Book on Demand. 444 p. ISBN 978-5-458-23202-9. (In Russ.).

3. Bizior, R. (2016). Obraz Boga Ojca w kazaniach 2 połowy XIX w. a kontekst kulturowy. Język — Szkoła — Religia, 11 (3): 70—84. (In Pol.).

4. Bondareva, Ya. V. (2011). Theoretical and methodological foundations of Russian religious philosophy: historical and philosophical analysis. Author’s abstract of Doct. Diss. Moscow. 51 p. (In Russ.).

5. Buzalskaya, E. V. (2016). Typology of the Russian essay (linguocognitive aspect). Doct. Diss. St. Petersburg. 411 p. (In Russ.).

6. Dushin, O. E. (2005). History of culture. Culture of the European Middle Ages. Saint-Petersburg. 93 p. (In Russ.).

7. Gadomsky, A. K. (2018). Lexicographic description of the terminology of theolinguistics (on the example of the Russian and Polish languages). Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Series 2: Linguistics, 17 (1): 17—28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2018.1.2 8. (In Russ.).

8. Hyland, K. (1990). A Genre Description of the Argumentative Essay. RELC Journal, 21 (1): 66—78.

9. Kaida, L. G. (2008). Essay as a genre in literature and journalism. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 10. Journalism, 4: 19—24. (In Russ.).

10. Komarova, Z. I. (2016). Methodology, method, methodology and technology of scientific research in linguistics. Moscow: FLINT: Nauka. 820 p. (In Russ.).

11. Koznova, N. N. (2011). The genre of essays in the memoirs of writers. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University, 8 (233): 74—78. (In Russ.).

12. Kukueva, G. V. (2015). Linguopragmatic model of the speech genre of essays in Internet communication. Philology and man, 3: 29—37. (In Russ.).

13. Lebedeva, N. B. (2001). Natural written Russian speech as an object of linguistic research. Bulletin of the Barnaul State Pedagogical University, 1—2: 4—10. (In Russ.).

14. Milrud, R. P., Maksimova, I. R. (2020). Essay as a genre, a method of teaching and a tool of pedagogical measurement. Language and culture, 49. 255—275. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/49/17. (In Russ.).

15. Moskvin, V. P. (2015). Methodology of intertextual analysis. Bulletin of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 3 (98): 116—121. (In Russ.).

16. Postovalova, V. I. (2019). Theolinguistics in modern humanitarian cognition: origins and directions. Anthology of theolinguistics: collection of articles, 2. Ulyanovsk: Master Studio. 36—47. ISBN 978-5-6041747-4-6. (In Russ.).

17. Shmeleva, T. V. (1997). Model of the speech genre. Genres of speech, 1: 88—98. (In Russ.).

18. Smolina, A. N. (2019). Spiritual writing-conversation: genre and stylistic features. Bulletin of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 9 (142): 144—152. (In Russ.).

19. Teplyashina, A. N. (2013). The artistic and aesthetic effect of modern newspaper journalism. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University. Series 9. Philology. Oriental studies. Journalism, 3: 266—274. (In Russ.).

20. Volkov, A. A. (2013a). Course of Russian rhetoric. Moscow: Russian panorama; Department. 416 p. ISBN 978-5-93165-316-7. (In Russ.).

21. Volkov, A. A. (2013b). Theory of rhetorical argumentation. Moscow: Dobrosvet, KDU Publishing House. 374 p. ISBN 978-5-98227-836-4. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Smolina A.N. Model for Describing of Speech Genre “Spiritual Essay”: Basic Parameters and Implementation (Theolinguistic Aspect). Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(10):134-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-10-134-152

Views: 442


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-756X (Print)
ISSN 2227-1295 (Online)