System Modeling of Author’s Image in Texts of One Speech Genre
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-10-153-174
Abstract
The question of the method of describing of Author’s Image in Texts in modern linguistics is discussed in the article. It is argued that this technique requires the development of principles focused on systems engineering. The authors of the article note that one of the problems of modern genre studies is that a large amount of research in this area in aggregate reflects various approaches to the description of the “image of the author” in texts of the genre. The novelty of the research is seen in the fact that for an objective description of the author’s image, the hypothesis of “Functional modeling of the author of the genre” is put forward: the model of the genre system in the epistemological description has a complex level structure. The authors of the article put forward their own development of the technology for describing the image of the author of the genre, defining this technology as effective and consistent with the principles of a systematic approach to genre phenomena. In order to solve the problem of the attributive aspect of describing a genre, that is, to determine its units, it seems productive to analyze the genre according to the so-called communicative-semiotic model. The article proposes ways of solving emerging problems concerning the principles of objectivist description of the author’s model of the genre.
About the Authors
N. I. TyukaevaRussian Federation
Nadezhda I. Tyukaeva – PhD in Philology, Associate Professor Department of General and Russian Linguistics
Barnaul
K. I. Brinev
China
Konstantin I. Brinev – Doctor of Philology, Professor Department of Russian
Kaifeng
References
1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In: Aesthetics of verbal creativity. Moscow: Art. 430 p. (In Russ).
2. Bolotnova, N. S. (2007). Philological analysis of the text. Moscow: Flint. 502 p. ISBN 978-5-9765-0053-2. (In Russ).
3. Davidson, D. (2003). About the idea of a conceptual scheme. In: Truth and interpretation. Moscow: Praxis. 258—277. ISBN 5-901574-30-3. (In Russ).
4. Dolgina, E. S. (2018). The problem of definitions of “Utopia” and “Science fiction” in historical discourse. The world of science, culture, and education, 6 (37): 32—33. (In Russ).
5. Dubrovskaya, T. V. (2019). “Only memory and Gelendvagen 5.5 are worthy of love”: boy lyrics as a genre of youth Internet discourse. Genres of speech, 1 (21): 56—65. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2019-1-21-56-65. (In Russ).
6. Golev, N. D. (2004). Linguistic personality, anthropotext and linguopersonological hypothesis of language. In: Philology: XXI century (theory and methodology of teaching). Barnaul: Publishing House of the Altai Pedagogical Academy. 4—9. (In Russ).
7. Golev, N. D. (2006). Linguopersonological aspects of Russian metalanguage consciousness. In: Linguopersonology: types of language personalities and personality-oriented learning. Barnaul: Publishing House of the Altai Pedagogical Academy. 342—353. ISBN 5-88210-360-6. (In Russ).
8. Golev, N. D., Napreenko, G. V. (2016). Formal and quantitative modeling of a linguistic personality: an identification aspect. In: Language personality: modeling, typology, portraiture. Siberian linguopersonology. Moscow: Lenand. 76—93. (In Russ).
9. Issers, O. S. (2008). Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech. Moscow: Lki. 284 p. ISBN 978-5-382-00698-7. (In Russ).
10. Ivanova, M. V., Klushina, N. I. (2018). Journalism in the history of the Russian literary language: from Old Russian literature to Internet communication. Bulletin of the RUDN. Series: Russian and foreign languages and methods of teaching them, 16 (1): 50—62. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2264-2018-16-1-50-62. (In Russ).
11. Ivantsova, E. V. (2010). Linguopersonology: Fundamentals of the theory of linguistic personality: a textbook. Tomsk: Tomsk University Press. 160 p. ISBN 978-5-7511-1935-5. (In Russ).
12. Kaida, L. G. (2008). Essay as a genre in literature and journalism. Bulletin of the Moscow University. The series “Journalism”, 4: 19—24. (In Russ).
13. Kaminskaya, T. L. (2009). Addressee in mass communication: Monograph. Veliky Novgorod: Novgorod University. 166 p. ISBN 978-5-89896-343-9. (In Russ).
14. Kim, L. G., Belyaeva, E. S. (2019). Pre-text expectations of the addressee as a factor of variability in the interpretation of a political text. Bulletin of the Tomsk University. Philology, 57: 48—62. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/57/3. (In Russ).
15. Klushina, N. I. (2008). Intentional categories of journalistic text (based on the material of periodicals 2000—2008). Doct. Diss. Moscow. 324 p. (In Russ).
16. Kozhinov, V. V. (1978). The author’s problem and the writer’s path (based on the material of two novels by Yuri Trifonov). In: Context-1977: Literary and theoretical studies. Moscow: The science. 23—47. (In Russ).
17. Kremshokalova, M. Ch. (2013). Good wishes and curses as small genres of oral speech (cognitive-discursive analysis). Nalchik: K-B University. 236 p. ISBN 978-5-93680-702-2. (In Russ).
18. Lebedeva N. B., Galkina, G. F. (2015). Linguopersonological variation in the genre “medical card of an outpatient patient”. Language personality: Modeling, typology, portraiture. Siberian linguopersonology, 2. Moscow: Lenand. 271—281. (In Russ).
19. Lebedeva, N. B. (2001). Natural written Russian speech as an object of linguistic research. Bulletin of the BSPU. Series. Humanities, 1: 6—12. (In Russ).
20. Lebedeva, N. B., Zyryanova, E. G., Plaksina, N. Y., Tyukaeva, N. I. (2011). “Genres of natural written speech. Student graffiti, marginal pages of notebooks, a private note”. Moscow: Krasand. 256 p. ISBN 978-5-396-00286-9. (In Russ).
21. Lebedeva, N. B. (2003). Towards the construction of genre typology (based on the material of natural written Russian speech). In: Natural written Russian speech: research and educational aspects, II. Barnaul: BSPU Publishing House. 91—100. (In Russ).
22. Osipov, G. S. (2011). Methods of artificial intelligence. Moscow: Fizmatlit. 296 p. (In Russ).
23. Panferov, V. N. (2014). Objectification of mental phenomena. Bulletin of the Herzen University, 2: 76—87. (In Russ).
24. Shatalova, L. S., Shatalova, N. S. (2018). Cognitive-discursive characteristics of texts of informative and analytical genres of military speech. The world of science, culture, and education, 2 (69): 641—646. (In Russ).
25. Shmeleva, T. V. (1997). Model of the speech genre. In: Genres of speech: A collection of scientific articles, 2: 88—98. (In Russ).
26. Solganik, G. Ya. (2001). The author as a style-forming category of a journalistic text. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 10. Journalism, 3. 74—83. (In Russ).
27. Tarasova, I. A. (2018). Genre in cognitive perspective. In: Genres of speech: Collection of scientific articles, 2 (18): 85—90. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2018-2-18-88-95. (In Russ).
28. Tokareva, G. A. (2016). Genre thinking of modern times and the problem of resonant dialogue in lyrics. International Scientific Research Journal, 8 (50) Part 5: 140—143. DOI: 10.18454/IRJ. 2016. 50. 200. (In Russ).
29. Tyukaeva, N. I. (2005). Student graffiti as a genre of natural written in Russian speech. PhD Diss. Barnaul: AltGPA. 229 p. (In Russ).
30. Tyukaeva, N. I. (2019a). Modeling of the speech genre: a formal and functional aspect (on the example of texts of Natural written Russian speech). Culture and text, 2 (37): 189—200. (In Russ).
31. Tyukaeva, N. I. (2019б). Justification of the principles of system modeling of the genre (for example, texts written in natural speech). Culture and text, 3 (38): 206—224. (In Russ).
32. Vezhbitska, A. (1997). Speech genres. Genres of speech: A collection of scientific articles, 1. Saratov: College. 99—112. ISBN 5-900641-79-1. (In Russ).
33. Vinogradov, V. V. (1971). On the theory of artistic speech. Moscow: Higher School. 233 p. (In Russ).
Review
For citations:
Tyukaeva N.I., Brinev K.I. System Modeling of Author’s Image in Texts of One Speech Genre. Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(10):153-174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-10-153-174