Germany’s Nuclear Energy Refusal Policy: from Conflict to Compromise
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-10-359-377
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the political process of Germany’s abandonment of nuclear energy. The results of a comparative analysis of government decisions taken over the course of one decade, but different in nature and having different consequences for the nuclear industry are presented in the paper. Special attention is paid to the issue of interaction between the government and energy companies in the context of the decisions of 2002 and 2011. It is shown that the abandonment of atomic energy in 2002 was a compromise solution, taking into account both the political desire of society to stop the operation of the nuclear power plant, and the economic interests of energy concerns. The author analyzes the consequences of the unilateral decision of the FRG government in 2011, infringing on the interests of the nuclear lobby, which led to many years of litigation that ended in favor of energy concerns. A review of the final compromise agreements between the companies and the government governing the issue of fair compensation for the early shutdown of nuclear power plants was carried out. Based on a comparative analysis of the two decisions on Germany’s withdrawal from nuclear energy and their consequences, it is concluded that, when entire industries are closed for political reasons, consultations with the involvement of all interested parties are necessary to work out an acceptable compromise.
About the Author
A. V. Zimakov
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey V. Zimakov – PhD in Economics, Researcher, Center for European Studies
Researcher ID F-7869-2017
Moscow
References
1. Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N., Brauch, M. D. (2014). The State of Play in Vattenfall v. Germany II: Leaving the German public in the dark. In: The International Institute for Sustainable Development Briefing Note. December 2014.
2. Chassot, S. (2014). Sustainable? A cross-country analysis of the socio-political acceptance of the nuclear phase out in Germany and Switzerland focusing on opportunities for strategic influence. Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung Und Praxis, 66 (3): 247—265.
3. Cho Il Hyun. (2020). To escape or embrace reactors? The politics of nuclear phase-out in Germany and South Korea In: The Pacific Review. 27. DOI: 10.1080/09512748.2020.1806341.
4. Glushkova, I. V. (2015). Prospects for an energy strategy in Germany. Proceedings of higher educational institutions. Energy problems, 3—4: 42—50. (In Russ.).
5. Huß, C. (2014). Energy transition by conviction or by surprise? Environmental policy from 2009 to 2013. German Politics, 23 (4): 430—445. DOI: 10.1080/09644008.2014.953068.
6. Johnstone, P., Stirling, A. (2020). Comparing nuclear trajectories in Germany and the United Kingdom: From regimes to democracies in sociotechnical transitions and discontinuities. Energy Research & Social Science, 59: 27. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101245.
7. Leidinger, T. (2017). The Judgement of the Federal Constitutional Court on the Nuclear Phase-out in Germany: Every Light hat its Shadow. Atw-International Journal for Nuclear Power, 62 (1): 26—29.
8. Marg, S., Geiges, L., Butzlaff, F., Walter, F. (2013). Die neue Macht der Bürger. Bonn: Rowohlt. 342 c.
9. Matthes, F. C. (2017). Energy transition in Germany: a case study on a policy-driven structural change of the energy system. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 14 (1): 141—169. DOI: 10.1007/s40844-016-0066-x.
10. McCauley, D., Brown, A., Rehner, R., Heffron, R., Van de Graaff, S. (2018). Energy justice and policy change: An historical political analysis of the German nuclear phase-out. Applied Energy, 228: 317—323. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.093.
11. Michaelowa, A. (2013). The politics of climate change in Germany: ambition versus lobby power. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Climate Change, 4 (4): 315—320.
12. Rehner, R., McCauley, D. (2016). Security, justice and the energy crossroads: Assessing the implications of the nuclear phase-out in Germany. Energy Policy, 88: 289—298. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.038.
13. Supyan, N. V. (2011). The Narrowing Bridge: Problems of the Federal Republic of Germany's Energy Policy. Contemporary Europe, 3 (47): 67—79. (In Russ.).
14. Toropchin, G. V. (2013). Peaceful atom in the Federal Republic of Germany in the late XX — early XXI century. In the context of the concept Energievend. Europe, 12: 77—84. (In Russ.).
15. Vosse, W. (2010). The German peace movement and its influence on German politics and political culture in the 1970s and 1980s. In: The Cold War and the Regional Integration: Comparative Studies on the History of International Relations Between Europe and Asia. Aoyama Gakuin University. 275—302.
16. Wittneben, B. (2012). The impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on European energy policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 15 (1): 1—3. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.09.002.
17. Zimakov, A. V. (2014). EU Nuclear energy: economics vs. Ecology. World economy and international relations, 9: 16—19. (In Russ.).
18. Zimakov, A. V. (2016). German pension system: evolution or revolution? Contemporary Europe, 4 (70): 94—103. (In Russ.).
19. Zimakov, A. V. (2017). Resolution on accelerated withdrawal of Germany from Nuclear energetics: Federal administrative court, Constitutional court, International arbitration. What next? International economic law, 2: 42—56. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Zimakov A.V. Germany’s Nuclear Energy Refusal Policy: from Conflict to Compromise. Nauchnyi dialog. 2021;(10):359-377. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2021-10-359-377
Views:
1445
Email this article 